Product
Information
|
Manufacturer
|
Vasque
|
Manufacturer website
|
http://www.vasque.com/
|
Year Manufactured
|
2009
|
Size tested/used
|
13 men's
Available in sizes Medium 7-12,13,14,15 |
Color tested/used
|
Beluga/Olive Oil
(only one color available)
|
MSRP
|
$130 US
|
|
Listed
|
Measured
|
Weight
|
2 lb 2 oz (960 g)
|
2 lb 8.8 oz (1160 g)
|
Note in the above table the substantial difference between listed and
measured weights. This is likely due to the size of the boot; the
product website does note state the size that was used for the listed
weight, but it is likely much smaller than my size 13's.
The picture at left shows the
front and back of the boots. The product website states the
following composition:
- Upper: Synthetic Leather Leather
- Upper: Airmesh Nylon Fabric
- Midsole: Molded EVA
- Outsole: Vibram Contact
- Footbed: Dual Density EVA
The nylon mesh (which provides the breathability) and the synthetic
leather are readily apparent in the photo. Also visible is the
generous padding around the ankles and in the tongue, the pull-strap
with its yellow strip, and the lacing
system. The prominent Vibram labeling can be seen in yellow at
the heel.
The excellent toe protection can be seen in the left boot. The
entire toe area is very rigid and should prevent serious toe stubs on
trail rocks and roots.
The yellow stripes on the lacing loops are very visible in low light
and will aid lace repair and re-lacing in the dark.
In the photo at right the extent of the nylon
mesh is more readily seen, as is the lone lace lug. The generous
padding in the tongue can also be seen.
The GORE-TEX label for the waterproof liner is visible just below the
lacing lug.
Laces: there are six courses of laces on this boot. From the
bottom, the first three are attached with straps to the inside of the
tongue area. The fourth is attached to a strap sewn to the
outside of the upper. The fifth is a plastic-reinforced (yellow)
hole in the upper. The final course is looped over the gray
plastic lugs, which are generously sized for ease of capture while
lacing.
I had no difficulties getting a nice snug lacing the first few times I
put the boots on. The laces themselves are soft and spongy making
it comfortable on the hands when tightening.
The photo above shows the details of the Vibram
sole. I find the design of the lugs quite interesting, with the
light gray traction grips on the bottom of the ball of the foot for
downhill descents.
There are two sets of lugs that I'm not sure I fully understand.
Both are in yellow Vibram with a small light-gray lug that appears to
provide side-traction. One is just behind the arch, the other on
the outside ball of the foot. They would appear to function
mostly when the very inner or outer part of the foot is used, perhaps
when crossing steep inclines.
The bright yellow piece at the back of the arch appears to be a small
section of the TPU plate - it is very rigid. Note also the hard
yellow Vibram lugs at the outer part of the heel which is typically the
highest wear spot.
The above picture shows the various insoles I will be using
with the boots. This is very important to me - I have Plantar
Fasciitis
and I need a lot of arch support to make it into camp without limping
and a lot of pain. The first one on the left in yellow is the
insole provided with the boot. It has some nice cushion and feels
like it will breathe well, but not much support. In white are my
custom orthotics that have a very rigid base (blue plastic). Next
are two different models of Powerstep off-the-shelf insoles in
blue. The first on the left is the regular full-length model, the
second on the right is the Pinnacle model that has substantially more
cushioning, but fills up more of the foot box.
Initial Use
My first boot use was a simple local day hike of about 5 miles (8 km)
on April 21, 2009. The weather was sunny, around 50 F (10 C) with
high winds between 7 and 30 mph (11 to 48 kph). The altitude was
around 1000 ft (305 m). Walking surface was gravel and packed
dirt. I used the stock Vasque insoles on this hike.
Socks: I typically wear liner socks, and I consider them essential with
this boot given the larger size I am using. I wore merino wool
liners with midweight merino wool hiking socks. Observations:
- The boots pulled on easily with the integrated pull strap.
- The laces tightened nicely. My feet felt snug.
- Fit: in the recent past I have tried to purchase size 12 ½
footwear. Since the Breeze boots are available only in whole
sizes I rounded up to size 13. They feel a little roomy, but my
feet swell substantially when backpacking and with thick socks I am not
expecting issues. With two pairs of socks on the fit was
comfortable. I didn't notice any forward sliding in the boot on
downhills. The width was snug, but I didn't detect any pinching.
- Sole flex is excellent. These boots flex at the ball of the
foot almost as much as my trail runners. This is critical for me
to prevent Plantar Fasciitis flare-ups.
- The temperature was quite low, so I didn't anticipate any foot
sweating and experienced none. Even in the car on the way to and
from the trail, my feet did not get hot.
- The gray color goes nicely with any color of clothing.
- There is not a lot of cushion in the boot. My feet were not
sore after the hike, but I could tell when I was walking on gravel with
small rocks.
- Traction was good going up and down small hills. I was
happy with the grip.
- I could tell I was wearing lightweight boots -- my feet felt very
light while walking.
- Good cushioning in the ankles -- they felt very protected.
Summary
So far I am impressed with these boots. They seem to be a good
compromise between foot protection and going lightweight. I am
excited about getting them out into the backcountry.
Likes:
- Lightweight
- My feet didn't get overheated
- Lacing works well
- Decent traction
- I like the judicious use of bright yellow for components I may
need to find in the dark: pull-on strap, and the lace straps and holes.
Areas for improvement:
- Not a lot of cushion in the sole. I'll be wearing insoles
and socks with good bottom cushions.
Field Report
Test Conditions
Dates
|
April 23-26, 2009 |
May 1-3, 2009
|
May 20-24, 2009 |
June 11-14, 2009
|
Location
|
North Country Trail (NCT), Heritage section in
northern Wisconsin |
Superior Hiking Trail (SHT) between Split Rock
and Tettegouche state parks.
This was a car-camping trip, so only short sections of the trail were
hiked in and between the parks.
|
Kekekabic Trail through the Boundary Waters
Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) of northern Minnesota. |
North Country Tail (NCT), Chequamegon section in
northern Wisconsin
|
Hike Distance
(by day)
|
5.5, 11.6, 4.9 and 1.5 miles
(8.9, 18.7, 7.9 and 2.4 km)
|
approximately 5, 3 and 5 miles
(8, 4.8 and 8 km)
|
11.2, 9.1, 8.4, 10.0 and 8.6 miles
(18, 14.6, 13.5, 16.1 and 13.8 km)
|
4.5, 12.8 and 9.5 miles
(7.25, 20.6 and 15.3 km)
|
Altitude
|
1250 to 1800 ft
(380 to 550 m) |
650 ft to 1500 ft
(200 m to 460 m)
|
1450 ft to 2000 ft
(440 m to 610 m) |
1050 ft to 1650 ft
(320 m to 500 m)
|
Terrain
|
Heavily forested mix of deciduous and
pine. Streams, rivers, waterfalls, one beaver dam crossing.
Granite outcroppings. |
Heavily forested mix of birch and aspen.
Day 1 and 2 were ascent/descent trips, Day 3 was constant up-and-down.
|
Burned and blowdown areas to dense forests of
poplar and spruce. |
Heavily forested with maple and pine.
Streams, lakes, bogs and beaver dams. |
Weather
|
Nightly lows near freezing, daytime highs
ranging from 45-65 F (7-18 C). Winds were blustery, with a
significant hail, electrical and rainstorm the night of April 24.
|
Nightly lows just below freezing, daytime highs
ranging from 45-65 F (7-18 C). Day 3 was sunny.
|
Lowest nighttime temperature was 29 F (-2 C),
highest daytime temperature of 80 F (27 C) |
Coldest nighttime low was 41 F (5 C), daytime
highs around 74 F (23 C), very light winds. Mostly sunny with
rain shower June 13. |
Trail Conditions
|
Muddy, with stretches of ankle-deep running
water from snow melt and spring rains. The first few hours on
April 24 included hiking in ankle-deep slushy snow.
|
Muddy with snow patches. The real
challenge was day 3 was a trail-clearing expedition, with lots of
bushwhacking through thousands of downed aspen and birch trees.
|
Muddy, lots of standing water. The trail
goes through many bogs and over numerous beaver dams.
|
Mostly dry, with a few muddy and wet
spots. The beaver dam crossings were wet with slippery logs.
|
Socks used with boots
|
Midweight merino wool hiking socks with silk
liner
sock
|
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with silk
liner
sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with silk
liner
sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with
Coolmax liner
sock |
Insoles used
|
Powerstep Full-Length
|
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Total pack weight with food and
water
|
46 lbs (21 kg)
|
Daypack only
|
60 lbs (27.2 kg) This is far more weight
than I normally carry, but I had to pack food for 8+ days in case I had
to do a yo-yo hike.
|
Total pack weight = 44.5 lbs (20.2 kg)
Food = 10.8 lbs (4.9 kg)
Water = 5.0 lbs (2.3 kg)
Base weight = 28.7 lbs (13 kg)
|
Observations
North Country Trail - Heritage section
This was my first backpacking trip with the
boots, and with only the one dayhike described in the Initial Report to
break them in.
As is apparent from the photo at left, this was a typical too-early
spring hike with snowy, wet, muddy trail conditions. There was a
significant snowfall in the area just prior to our arrival, and the
remainder can be seen in the woods in the photo upper left. It
was warm enough the create a rapid snowmelt, resulting in water running
down the trails.
We often had to result to picking our way around the areas of water
that were over our boots, as my compatriots can be seen doing in the
photo background.
I came away from this trip very impressed with the waterproof
construction of the Vasque Breeze LT GTX boots. My feet remained
completely dry until one deep crossing where I had no choice but to hop
on my toes over a deep spot, but alas it was too deep and a little
water slopped over the tops of the boots. This is certainly not
the fault of the boots -- nothing can keep water out of your boots when
its deeper than the boot height.
We didn't have a lot of technical climbing on this trip, but we did
have some tricky crossings including the beaver dam shown in the
following photo:
Photo courtesy of Paul Smith, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Newspaper
The Breeze boots did a great job of helping me keep my footing on this
crossing over wet, slippery branches and logs. I made it across
with no incident and with dry feet. The soles gripped well, and
the rigid toe guard prevented stubs from causing any damage to my feet.
The boots breathed exceptionally well. The first day out was
warm, sunny and dry. The perspiration from my feet seemed to
dissipate well. Not all GORE-TEX lined boots are created equal -
I've owned other pairs that did not seem to breathe nearly as
well. My speculation is that these boots breathe better due to
the mesh uppers. Between the excellent breathability and the
comfort I didn't feel rushed to change into camp shoes in the evening;
the following photo shows me preparing dinner by Wren Falls still
wearing the Vasque Breeze boots long after we finished hiking that day:
Photo courtesy of Paul Smith, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Newspaper
Fit: I did notice the first day that the outside of
my little toes were sore and slight abraded. I was wearing
heavier (merino wool) liner socks, and switched to thinner, lighter
(silk) liners for the rest of the trip. This seemed to do the
trick, and my toes never blistered. I did develop a small blister
on the inner right ball of my foot, which seemed to rub against the
side of the boot. As can be seen in the Initial Report pictures,
the front of the boot is a little on the narrow side. If the to
box were made just a little wider, I think the fit for me would be
improved.
Very near to where the above photo was taken I did turn my ankle coming
down the trail with the boots on. The ankle support of the boots
is decent,
but will not completely prevent ankle turns. It did brace me
enough to prevent a sprain or otherwise injure myself.
One aspect of the boot that really impressed me is the
flexibility of the soles at the ball of the foot. This is
critical for plantar fasciitis sufferers like myself; if footwear does
not flex at the foot ball, excess tension is placed on the heel which
can lead to inflammation.
The photo at right shows the exceptional flex this boot has at this
critical point. The toe plate is completely rigid, but it ends
right at the ball of the foot allowing the boot to bend. As a
result I suffered no foot pain from hiking on this trip.
I have owned one other boot that had similar flexibility, and the sole
cracked after only a few days use right at the ball of the foot at the
flex point. I'll be keeping an eye out on these boots for a
similar potential failure point.
Superior Hiking Trail
The conditions were a repeat of the NCT hike with wet muddy trail with
snow
patches. The new challenge for the boots on this trip was the
trail-clearing expedition on day 3. The first 3 miles (5 km) or
so were not too bad, as we were clearing the trail as we went. At
about 12:30PM the bar broke on the chainsaw, and the sawyer decided we
would hike out. We had a shuttle vehicle parked at Tettegouche
state park which was closer than the lot where we started from, but we
would be hiking through uncleared trail.
This turned out to be a real challenge. There was a terrific ice
storm in March that deposited about 2 in (5 cm) of ice on the trees
centered on the area we were clearing. The ice had brought down
countless young aspens and old birch trees. There were spots
where I was literally walking on tree trunks, stepping from fallen tree
to fallen tree. This was an interesting traction challenge for
footwear, and the Breeze boots handled the situation with aplomb.
I had no slips, despite the fact I was hiking without my trekking poles
which just get in the way when clearing trail.
Once again I returned from the trip with mud-caked boots, but bone-dry
feet. I had no discomfort from wearing the boots on this trip,
but the mileage was low.
Kekekabic Trail
The greatest hiking challenge of this trail is making it through the
myriad blown-down trees (from straight-line winds) and fire-burned
areas. There are tree trunks and branches strewn everywhere on
some sections of this trail, and it can be a real trial of ankle
strength and boot support. I had only one problem on this account
when I was stepping over a blown-down tree and came down on a slippery
branch that turned my ankle. My leg collapsed and I fell to my
knees, fortunately with no injury. I don't think any boot could
have prevented me from turning my ankle in this situation.
The trail also is very rocky in spots, from shale to boulders.
The Breeze boots handled these passages with aplomb.
My compatriots crossing a typical Kekekabic Trail stream
The Kekekabic trail is a lowland passage through the Boundary Waters
wilderness, so we were slopping around in mud, over beaver dams and
through lengthy stretches of flooded ground. The picture above
illustrates the type of stream we crossed several times per day.
Once again the Breeze boots proved to be absolutely waterproof and my
feet remained dry. We had one river crossing, hip-deep for
me. I removed the boots and used sandals for this exercise.
North Country Trail - Chequamegon section
On this trip I
got another blister with the boots, on the inside of the ball of my
right foot. I suspect with the warmer weather my feet were
sweating more, which caused the blister. I also did not take my
boots off during hiking breaks, which likely contributed to moisture
buildup in the boots.
This trip did not stress the waterproof capability of the Breeze
boots. I sunk into muddy puddles up to my ankles a few times, but
nothing like on my prior trips. Most of the hiking was through
the pleasant "green tunnel" as shown in the photo at left.
I had no problems with traction or slipping on the beaver dams -- the
boots kept me steady in all the situations I encountered.
Summary
I love these boots. They are an ideal compromise for the type of
hiking I like to do: lightweight, yet waterproof and reasonable
support. I look forward to backpacking with them for
the next two months.
Likes:
- Completely waterproof, no leaks
- Lightweight
- Great breathability
- Good traction
- Overall comfort including superior flexibility at the ball of the
foot
Areas for improvement:
- Better ankle support.
- Widen the toe box slightly
Long Term Report
Test Conditions
Dates
|
June 2, 2009
|
July 11-12, 2009
|
July 25, 2009 |
August 1-2, 2009 |
August 15-16, 2009
|
August 22, 2009
|
August 23, 2009
|
August 29-30, 2009
|
Location
|
Catalina State Park north of Tucson Arizona
|
Mt Lemmon just north of Tucson, Mt Lemmon Trail
(segment of Arizona Trail)
|
Wild Burro trail through the Tortolita mountains
northwest of Tucson, Arizona
|
Mt Lemmon, Wilderness of Rocks
Trail |
Mt Lemmon, Butterfly Peak |
Pima Canyon in Coronado National
Forest near Tucson
|
Ventana Canyon in Coronado
National
Forest near Tucson |
Mt Lemmon, Samaniego Ridge Trail
|
Hike Distance
(by day)
|
3.8 miles (dayhike)
(6.1 km)
|
5.6, 1.5 miles
(9, 2.4 km)
|
5.7 miles (dayhike)
(9.2 km)
|
10, 3.3 miles
(16.1, 5.3 km)
|
7.6, 1.4 miles
(12.2, 2.25 km)
|
7.0 miles (dayhike)
(11.3 km)
|
7.0 miles (dayhike)
(11.3 km) |
6.6, 2.3 miles
(10.6, 3.7 km)
|
Altitude
|
2700 to 3650 ft
(380 to 550 m) |
7450 to 9100 ft
(2271 m to 2774 m) |
2600 to 3300 ft
(790 m to 1006 m) |
7000 ft to 8100 ft
(2100 m to 2500 m) |
6600 ft to 7800 ft
(2010 m to 2380 m) |
2800 ft to 4300 ft
(850 m to 1310 m)
|
3000 ft to 4800 ft
(915 m to 1460 m)
|
7150 ft to 9100 ft
(2180 m to 2774 m)
|
Terrain
|
The Romero Canyon trail goes straight up the
foothills. All ascent/descent, no level trail.
|
Mountain meadows, rocky ridges
and trail. All descent/ascent, almost no level hiking. |
Desert scrub. I took the Lower Javalina
trail on the way up which was pretty steep, the rest of the hike was
through a wash.
|
Pine forests, rocky trail and
outcroppings |
Santa Catalina mountains: pine
forest at higher
altitudes, scrub oak at lower altitudes. |
Lower elevations of Santa
Catalina mountains: high desert with lots of brush and rocks
|
Lower elevations of Santa
Catalina mountains: high desert with lots of brush and rocks |
Mountain meadows, rocky ridges
and trail. All descent/ascent, almost no level hiking. |
Weather
|
Hot. 102 F (39 C) in full sun. Low
humidity though, my shirt never got sweaty.
|
Nighttime low of 60F (15 C),
daytime high at lower altitude of 88 F (31 C) |
Humid for Arizona, and about 85 F
(29 C)
|
Night time low of 60F (15 C),
daytime high at lower altitude of 90 F (32 C) |
Night time low was about 55 F
(13 C), daytime
highs around 85 F (23 C), very light winds during the day but became
quite strong, gusting to around 25 mi/hr (40 km/hr) at night. |
Cool & humid at the start as
it had rained heavily the night before, with a high of around 80 F (27
C) as this was a morning hike.
|
Clear. Reasonably cool at
the start (6:45AM) and warming up as the morning progressed.
|
Clear during the day, clouded up
at about 6PM. High temperature about 80 F (27 C), low of 60 F (15
C)
|
Trail Conditions
|
Rocky with some loose gravel.
|
Dry with some loose gravel.
|
Sandy in the wash, rocky in the hills.
|
Dry, some packed and dry dirt,
some loose gravel, some rocky.
|
Trail is dirt in some
areas, rocky in others. Much of the trail had a steep lateral
pitch as it was cut out of a steep mountainside.
|
Puddles at the lower elevations
from the rain, but extremely rocky trail with lots of boulder and
uneven rocks.
|
Very rocky trail with lots of
dry creek crossings, heavy brush.
|
Some areas of dirt, bust mostly
rocks and gravel.
|
Socks used with boots
|
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with
coolmax liner sock
|
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with silk
liner
sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking socks with silk
liner
sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking
socks with silk
liner
sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking
socks with
coolmax liner sock |
Lightweight merino wool hiking
socks with
coolmax liner sock |
Midweight merino wool hiking
socks with silk
liner
sock |
Midweight merino wool hiking
socks with silk
liner
sock |
Insoles used
|
Powerstep Full-Length
|
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Powerstep Full-Length |
Total pack weight with food and
water
|
Approximately 8 lb ( kg) day pack loaded with
water.
|
Approximately 40 lbs
(18 kg)
|
Just a waist pack with water and GPS, about 2.5
lbs (1.1 kg)
|
One of my lightest baseweight
trips, but with 5L of water carried I started out at about 35 lbs (16
kg)
|
Similar to prior trip, about 35
lbs (16kg)
|
Lumbar pack only, about 5 lbs
total (2.3 kg)
|
Lumbar pack only, about 5 lbs
total (2.3 kg) |
About 35
lbs (16kg) |
Observations
Catalina State Park
View west towards Oro Valley from the Romero Trail
This trip to Tucson was the interview visit with my potential
employer. I had never been to Tucson before and wanted to check
out the area. Catalina State park was just minutes away from my
hotel, and looked like it had pretty good trails, so thought I'd take a
hike since my flight got in around noon. It was hot and dry,
but I wore the Breeze boots anyway.
As it turned out, it was a good decision to wear boots instead of trail
runners or sandals. The trail was very rocky; I needed the ankle
support. Despite the heat my feet never felt sweaty. The
air was extremely dry and any perspiration would quickly evaporate if
the boots breathed.
Between the heat and the constant climbing I turned around after about
an hour. The picture above was taken near where I turned
around. I was winded, hot and thirsty, even though I had plenty
of water with me. Seems like this Minnesota boy is going to need
a little adaptation to the local climate.
On the way down I did slip once on some loose gravel on top of a rocky
area. No boot would have kept traction in those conditions.
The boot performed well on the constant ascent and descents, with no
sore toes even though I did not use my trekking poles.
Mount Lemmon - Mt Lemmon Trail
My first backpacking trip in Arizona! I drove to the top of Mount
Lemmon arriving at the summit mid-afternoon. I took the Mount
Lemmon trail (#5) descending down past the Wilderness of rocks.
At a point where my quadriceps started to fatigue I climbed back to my
camping site for the night. Its a lot harder walking uphill than
downhill at these altitudes!
I was carrying a fairly lightweight pack, at least for me. Most
of my weight is typically food and water, and on this trip I had only
packed food for one day, so it was a pretty light load. I did use
trekking poles, and had no footing problems nor sore feet.
Tortolita Mountains
I am exploring the hiking opportunities near where I live. The
Tortolita Mountain Park is just 15 minutes from my temporary housing,
and I struck off one Saturday morning to check it out. The Breeze
boots did a nice job of keeping sand and stones out, as I did not wear
gaiters, highly unusual for me. This morning was quite humid for
Tuscon, around 60% relative humidity. The hike was fairly short,
but my feet were comfortable and reasonably dry when I took my boots
off at the end. I am pleased so far overall how adaptable these
boots are to hot and dry conditions. I was quite concerned with
the move to Arizona that I would have difficulties completing the test,
as I feared the boots would be unbearably warm. Not so.
Mount Lemmon - Wilderness of Rocks Trail
With a trail named "Wilderness of Rocks" one would expect a rocky
trail, and I was not disappointed. This was my most substantial
backpack trip to-date, as I slowly acclimate to hiking at altitude and
high temperatures. The photo below, actually shot from the Mt
Lemmon Trail above the month before, shows the type of terrain I was in
down below during this hike.
Wilderness of Rocks viewed from the trail above
I began the journey from the Sunset Trailhead off of the Catalina
Highway, and hiked the Sunset Trail to Marshall Gulch. This trail
was very gravelly and rocky. One of the reasons my baseweight was
light on this trip is I left out some gear I had completed testing, but
also left behind my water purifier, believing that it would be of no
use. There is a spring at Marshall Gulch, and I continued to
follow a trickle of water running in the canyon for about 1/2 of the
rest of the trip.
From the Marshall Gulch picnic area I followed the Marshall Gulch trail
to Marshall Saddle. This section of the trail follows the gulch
bottom, and was mostly packed dirt. At Marshall Saddle I finally
picked up the Wilderness of Rocks trail and followed it all the way to
the Mt Lemmon Trail, just a very short distance from where I turned
around three weeks earlier. I turned around and hiked back to a
spot just short of Marshall Saddle where I set up camp for the
night. The next morning I hiked out early before the sun started
heating things up.
On the return leg late in the afternoon of day one I encountered my
first first rattlesnake in the wild. I rounded a corner around a
boulder and heard a very loud sizzling noise. I jumped back,
looked down, and indeed there was a 4 ft (1.3 m) Black
Rattlesnake. I was happy I was wearing my sturdy Vasque boots,
and not my sandals! Of course the boots would not stop a bite
from a venomous rattler, but I was still happy I was wearing them.
Overall, the boots performed very well on this trip. I did not
take them off during breaks, yet I formed no blisters despite the
heat. I did notice that my feet were tired at the end of day one,
which I attribute to walking on many sharp rocks and boulders.
The Breeze boots are good and sturdy, but the footplate seems to be
designed to favor flexibility over the rigidity that would be required
to fully protect against sharp rocks. I did turn my ankle once on
day one, so once again the boots showed that they do not completely
protect hikers with weak ankles such as myself.
Mt Lemmon - Butterfly Peak
This was an easy overnight trip, my goal was just to explore the trails
and spend a nice night in the wilderness. This was the dustiest
trail I have hiked on with these boots. Enough of the trail was
dry dirt that it kicked up and blackened the backs of my calves,
despite
the relatively high gaiters I was wearing. The following picture
gives a good idea of the terrain with trees at higher altitudes, and
the
Sonoran desert below:
View from the Butterfly Trail
The trail is barely visible in the lower right corner of the photo, but
the steep lateral drop off is quite evident in the perspective.
I did take a short siesta at about 3PM where I took off my boots and
socks and allowed them to air dry. My feet were comfortable
throughout the hike. The Breeze boots provided sure footing on
both dirt and rocks.
Despite everything I read about how its rare to see rattlesnakes in the
wild, on this hike I nearly stumbled on my second rattler. This
one appeared to be a Diamondback that scared me half to death as I was
going around a boulder. In both cases I've encountered them in
middle to late afternoon when they appear to be sunning themselves on
the trail. Once again I felt some small comfort that I was
wearing sturdy boots.
Pima Canyon
Who would have thought that waterproof boots would come in handy in
Tuscon in August? When I arose early on the morning of August 22
I noticed it rained pretty hard during the night. The trails
would be wet. Sure enough, the rocks were slippery and I was soon
splashing through puddles with wild abandon. The brush along the
trail was also wet from the rain and early morning dew and soon my legs
and shorts were soaking wet.
I experienced no slips or falls on this hike despite the challenging
conditions. Without a heavy pack on my back it was easy to keep
my footing.
The trail is a gentler climb at the beginning, then slowly gets
steeper, more rugged and more difficult to follow as most hikers don't
venture too far from the trailhead. I did about 7 miles total
(11.3 km) in 3.5 hours, a respectable morning dayhike for me
considering the steady vertical gain & loss. I am somewhat
limited when hiking with a lumbar pack to the amount of hydration I can
carry, and my legs are not yet conditioned to mountain hiking, so I am
still keeping my hikes pretty short.
When I returned from the hike and took off my boots I had a few small
pebbles in them and my socks were pretty wet. The water must have
wicked down from the exposed socks. This was one of the rare
occasions when I did not wear gaiters with the Vasque boots. It
seems they are somewhat susceptible to allowing debris to enter from
the boot top, so gaiters are advisable when wearing them.
Ventana Canyon
Very similar hike to Pima Canyon the day before, but the trail was
dry. The Ventana trail crosses the dry creek many times as it
goes up the canyon. This was a bit of a challenge to maintain
good footing and not turn an ankle on a big boulder, but I had no
issues. Despite my advice above I went gaiterless again and had
to pick some bits of debris off the top of my socks during the hike
where they had
entered at the boot tongue and were lodged there. After the hike
I shook out the boots and there was quite a bit of accumulated debris.
Samaniego Ridge Trail
The beginning of this trail overlaps the Mt Lemmon Trail, then splits
off at about the 1.5 mile (2.4 km) point and begins to follow the
Samaniego Ridge. This was really tough going as this trail
appears little used, and is not well-marked. I lost the trail
about 3 times and had to backtrack. I had to turn around earlier
than I had planned, as the trail was blocked by fallen trees, and
appeared impassable thereafter. It was a pity, as I was hoping to
hit Samaniego Peak. I reached my campsite for the night around
5PM.
The Breeze boots performed well again, but I did find a blister on the
outside of my fourth toe when I took my boots off in camp, despite the
fact that I had taped that toe to prevent chronic problems with the
nail.
Summary
I believe I have tested these boots across an extremely wide variety of
conditions over the past 4 months, from the cold bogs of Minnesota's
BWCAW near the Canadian border to the dry deserts of southeast Arizona
near the Mexican border. Few boots could be
used in such a wide spectrum of conditions and still turn in a
satisfactory performance. If I had to pick an environment I
thought they were more suited for I would choose the Minnesota
terrain. The Tucson hiking environment does not require a
waterproof boot, though I may change my mind on this account when
winter arrives.
The boots have held up well despite the mileage. After 4 months
(and no cleanup) here's what they look like:
The tread shows little wear, there are no rips, tears or holes, and
none
of the stitching is frayed or loose. There is some wear on the
EVA of the midsoles, not on the bottom of the boot, but in the instep
area. This is not visible in the picture above, and seems to be
cosmetic only. There is however some wear developing in the
webbing adjacent to the ball of the foot:
The webbing wear can be seen towards the right of the photo. This
is an area where the boots really flex, and my suspicion is the webbing
rubs against the stiff synthetic leather as the boots and feet flex
with every step. At this time this is only a cosmetic issue, but
with very long term use it might be possible for this to develop a rip
or tear.
I have greatly enjoyed wearing and testing the Vasque Breeze boots, and
would highly recommend them to someone looking for a lightweight
waterproof breathable boot. I intend to continue to wear them
when the forecast calls for wet conditions. I recommend these
boots be worn with gaiters, as they do allow trail debris and moisture
in through the top of the boot as they do not hug the ankle.
Thanks to BackpackGearTest and Vasque for the
opportunity to test the Vasque Breeze LT GTX boots.
Kurt Papke