| |
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
|
|
Ibex Approach Tights
Long Term Report
|
|
Name: |
Cora Shea |
|
Background:
I began backpacking in 1997. I love backpacking in spring
and winter snow more than anything, especially on skis. My pack
weight ranges from 15 to 90 lb (7 to 40 kg), and I vary sleeping in a
tarp, tent, quinzhee, snowcave, bolt-hole, bivy, people-pile, or
straight under the stars. I spend a lot of my time outdoors, and I
prioritize gear durability and functionality above weight.
|
|
Age: |
25 |
|
Gender: |
Female |
|
Height: |
5 ft 9 in (1.75 m) |
|
Weight: |
150 lb (70 kg) |
|
Email address: |
cahhmc at yahoo dot com |
|
Location: |
Los Angeles, California, USA |
|
Date: |
December 17, 2005 |
|
Basic Product Information
|
|
Manufacturer: Ibex, ($95 US)
|
Year of Manufacture: 2005
|
Product: Approach Tights (Midlayer)
|
|
Listed weight: 12.4 oz (352 g)
|
Weight as delivered: 12.8 oz (363 g)
|
Size: Women's Medium
|
| |
|
The Approach Tights are black, woolly, form-fitting tights. They have an
elastic waistband and drawcord, a folding mesh pocket on the waist for storing
small items, and clean cuffs which are designed to be worn inside boots.
This report covers long term use from June to December, 2005. For more product information and items that can be reported on without field use, please see my Initial Report. For more information on actual use in the field, please see my Field Report.
|
|
If you are reading this after my field report, you probably know how much I loved these tights by that time of writing. After that point at the end of my field report, I launched into nearly 40 more days of field use with the tights before writing this long term report.
And as for my opinions, well, let me just say that I essentially moved into the tights in the outdoors, and I really don't intend to move out again.
The tights have proven to be the most versatile layer I've ever owned. Let me say that with a few qualifications: I don't like packing the tights (they're heavy and bulky) but I love wearing the tights. Here is the breakdown I enjoyed using the tights the most in:
- Below 20 F (-5 C) Aerobic or Stationary activity - The tights were
great under shells - they moved and breathed like a second warmer skin.
Though, they were not warm enough alone with just a shell below 20 F
(-5 C) when I was standing still.
- 20 F (-5 C) to 60 F (15 C) Aerobic activity - The tights performed
quite well on their own, or with a light breathable pant over them.
They really felt like a second skin on layering - they are very
stretchy and comfortable.
- 20 F (-5 C) to 60 F (15 C) Stationary activity - The tights served
as a great layering piece in this temperature range. Usually, I wanted
a shell or something similar to block the weather if I was standing
still.
- Above 60 F (15 C) Stationary activity - The tights still felt
comfortable on my skin even though it was warm. Aerobic activity
(running, hard hiking) was too much and too hot in this range, but if I
was just standing around I could leave them on comfortably. This was
nice since I would usually have to take normal long underwear off when
it got this warm, only to replace the long underwear late at night when
it got cold again (which means lots of stripping). The tights did get
uncomfortable above 85 F (30 C) but usually I could leave them on all
day up to that point to stay comfortable at night without changing.
An example of the perfect trip I used the tights on was a slightly-backcountry climbing trip 5 days long. The hike in was short (only about 1 mile / 1.6 km) and most of the activities involved just sitting around, interspersed with short bursts of aerobic activity (games, short hikes, scrambling around rocks, etc). Temperatures ranged from 30 F (-1 C) to 75 F (24 C), with wind during the night. The tights could do it all, and stayed on all 5 days constantly - under a pair of light cotton pants during the day, and nothing else over them while I slept. I don't think any other long underwear I own would have covered the same range and the same bursts of activity as comfortably and as unnoticed (but appreciated) as the Approach Tights did.
In short, for moderate and cooler/cold temperatures, the tights performed like a second skin which added warmth when I needed it, and breathed well when I started running around. What a range!
|
|
Long Term Care and Maintenance:
Sure, the tights are pretty easy to wash (I put them in the sink with a bit of
Woolite detergent and hung them to dry) but before that I discovered the most
amazing thing about them - I refrained from washing them for forty field days
of use from the first test. And then I smelled them. And.... nothing. I had
a hunch, sure, since around the field report time I hadn't washed them and they
didn't smell, and I was wondering if their incredible nearly-clean feel would
hold after twenty additional days of sweaty and hot spring and summer use.
It did.
Of course, to me the lack of stench (which would have appeared after day 5 or
so for any other piece of clothing I own) after day 40 is more than just the
lack of stench. The tights still felt fresh. They hadn't pilled up, or
stretched out, and really, they didn't feel or look worn at all (other than the
odd bit of fuzz and down feather stuck to them). So I washed them for the heck
of it, and wore them for another 20 days. Still ready, still fresh. These
tights are just about the lowest maintenance article of clothing I've had.
They're great!
Long Term Durability:
For what they are, the durability on the tights is great. But, let it be said that I didn't slide down rocks with them, I didn't bushwhack through Manzanita with them, and - truth be told - most of the time they spent in hiding either under another pair of pants or inside my sleeping bag. So would these stand up to abuse without the protection of another outer layer? I don't know, and I didn't want to find out because I loved the tights so much.
But, I really feel that the tights are built as what they are advertised to be - a midlayer. They certainly held up to days and days and days of abuse underneath an outer layer, and although that affords them a lot of protection it is also nothing to be sniffed at - especially since they came out with no pilling, no stretching, and no wearing at the spots (knees, butt, ankles) where they constantly rubbed against my socks, boots, and outer layers.
|
|
Overall, the Approach Tights have been an amazingly versatile piece of gear. I found them to be a bit bulky for trips where I packed them in my pack, but for trips where I wore them all the time I was always comfortable. More comfortable than any other bottom layer I've ever used. And these wear-all-the-time trips were not just limited to the cold of winter - I used and enjoyed the tights year-round.
|
Likes
|
Dislikes
|
|
A great fit
|
Not very wind resistant
|
|
Has an amazing temperature comfort range
|
High waist is hard to pull up under bibs
|
|
No smell!
|
No good way to keep waist string cinched down
|
|
Read more reviews of Ibex gear
Read more gear reviews by Cora Hussey
|