![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Clothing > Socks > Bridgedale X-Hale > Lynne Durham > Field ReportField ReportBridgedale XHale Socksby Lynne Durham June 1, 2006 REVIEWER BIO
BACKPACKING EXPERIENCEI have hiked and car camped all of my life, mostly in the relative flatlands of the lower and upper peninsulas of Michigan, but also in areas east of the Continental Divide, such as South Dakota, New England, Kentucky, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, and more. I have been backpacking since 2002. I keep my pack weight to 25% of bodyweight. However, I am always trying to lighten my load further to enhance my comfort and enjoyment as I like to hike big mileage.In addition to backpacking, I also participate in trail running, adventure racing, mountain biking and more. NAVIGATE THIS REPORT
PRODUCT INFORMATION
More product information can be found in my initial report. Back to top FIELD CONDITIONSDuring the field testing period, the XHale has been tested during a range of activities. These include the following:
Back to top IMPRESSIONSIn all conditions, the XHale has performed admirably. In highly aerobic activities, the XHale kept my feet dried as they wicked perspiration away from my feet. In persistent rain, the socks got wet relatively quickly (as expected), but retained warmth and comfort. Additionally, once I was out of the rain, they dried quickly from my body heat alone.In sandy conditions, sand quickly gets into the socks -- a situation I've found to be normal with every brand of socks I've worn. However, unlike some wool socks, the XHale didn't hang on to the sand tenaciously. I'm not sure if it's because of the mesh part of the construction, but when the socks got sandy, they shook out easily -- a great benefit to someone who lives in a sandy part of the country. Some other socks I've used have held on to sand...and even retain some in the fibers of the sock after machine washing. During this testing period, both pairs of socks have been machine washed and dried repeatedly. Despite approximately 50 miles on foot of usage for each pair (plus many miles of biking usage), the socks show no overt signs of wear. There are not yet any fraying or thinning areas and both pairs of socks retain the stretch, softness and cushion. In both cases, the socks showed some very minor shrinkage. This did not affect my comfort when wearing the men's socks. However, it made the women's socks just a bit too tight for my tastes: not as much wiggle room for my toes, creating a slightly constricted feeling. I think that is to be expected. As I mentioned in my initial report, my shoe size is pushing the upper limit of the women's socks' range. My shoe size runs from a US women's 10-11, depending on brand. These socks were rated up to US women's size 10. The socks do not hang on to odors. During the four-day backpack, the socks were worn every day and allowed to dry out at night. Unlike some synthetic socks I own, the socks were not disgustingly smelly -- relatively speaking. FOR FURTHER TESTINGAs the test continues, I will be interested to see how well the XHale holds up to additional trail miles. Do they develop any worn areas? Do they maintain their shape and stretchiness?THIS IS COOL
THIS COULD BE IMPROVED
Thank you to Bridgedale and BackpackGearTest.org for allowing me to test the XHale. Back to top Read more reviews of Bridgedale gear Read more gear reviews by Lynne Durham Reviews > Clothing > Socks > Bridgedale X-Hale > Lynne Durham > Field Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||