BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Cook Gear > Cook Sets > AntiGravityGear Mamas Kitchen Cookset > Rick Allnutt > Long Term Report

Mama's Kitchen Cookware

Long Term Report by Rick Allnutt

PRODUCT INFORMATION

Manufacturer:  AntiGravity Gear

Year Manufactured 2003

Manufacturer's home page: AntiGravity Gear

MSRP: $37.80, without stove and windscreen, as tested

Received: 2 July 2003

Date of Report: 23 December 2003

Listed weight:
2 Quart pot w/ lid - 5.9 oz (167 g)
2 Quart pot cozy - 1.4 oz (40 g)
3 Cup pot w/ lid - 3.8 oz (108 g)
3 Cup pot cozy - 1.0 oz (28 g)
Clamp Handle for the pots - 1.4 oz (40 g)

Weight as delivered:
2 Quart pot w/ lid - 5.8 oz (163 g) 
    pot alone 4.1 oz (116 g) 
    lid 1.7 oz (47 g)
2 Quart pot cozy -  1.2 oz (35 g)
3 Cup pot w/ lid - 3.7 oz (105 g)
    pot alone 2.5 oz (70 g) 
    lid 1.2 oz (35 g)
3 Cup pot cozy - 0.9 oz (25 g)
Clamp Handle for the pots -  1.2 oz (35 g)
(actual measured weight in grams, ounces are calculated)

Volume:
Volume of the 3 cup pot is 30 oz (.89 l)
Volume of the 2 quart pot is 61 oz (1.8 l)

LONG TERM REPORT

In addition to the trips mentioned in the Field Report, I also had the good fortune to use Mama's Kitchen on two additional solo section hikes of the AT.  Both were in Virginia.  Temperatures for those hikes ranged from a high of 70 F (21 C) to a low of 22 F (-6 C).  I used the 3 cup pot and it's cozy for these additional trips, cooking over a homemade twig stove and a homemade alcohol stove.  

I continued to use Mama's Kitchen for daily cooking of my oatmeal breakfast at home for approximately 100 additional days over the last four months.  Total days cooking with the pots exceeded 140 days.  

The handle supplied with the kit was originally quite stiff.  The handle has continued to become loose and limber.  It now is easy to open with a single hand, nearly falling open on its own.  I have not lubricated it.  It may be that the small amount of wood smoke which slightly discolors the pot end of the handle has lubricated the joint.  It will still stay attached to the pot rim without holding it, but the lower handle falls down somewhat when I do this.   

I did drill two small holes near the rim of the small pot to experiment with a lightweight wire bail.  I was able to drill the holes exactly opposite one another. This allows the pot to be lifted level by a simple bail made of ductile wire. I discovered that the 3 c (0.71 l) pot was much more stable with the wire bail when it contains 2 c (0.47 l) of liquid than 1 c (0.24 l).  I did not end up being happy with the stability of the pot, and after a 62 mi (100 km) hike, I went back to the supplied handle.  After making this change, I now need to be aware of the location of the holes when pouring liquid from the pot.  If I forget, part of the liquid comes out the hole and runs down the side of the pot.  I did not work out any novel plan to reduce weight of the handle by drilling portions of it out which I thought would look nice.  I believe others may have posted information on this sort of modification other places on the web.  

wood gas stove

Small Pot over Wood Gas Stove
Shows the hole for wire bail near rim

The pieces and parts of Mama's Kitchen continue to fit together nicely.  The inside of the cozies are getting dirty form wood smoke on the outside of the pots, but they have remained free of tears or other damage.  The lids continue to fit well, not becoming jammed in any way.  I can lift the tops off with one hand without spilling the contents of the pots.  

I also now have much experience with Mama's Kitchen over several prototype wood-burning camp stoves designed to fit inside the smaller pot.  It is particularly nice for the outside color of the pot to already be black in color, making it easier to accept the blackening that a wood fire causes.  These stoves range from fan assisted forge-like stoves to downdraft wood gas stoves.  The pots work with all these stoves without any problems associated with the stove.  

I have accidentally made several scratches of the inside of the small pot putting my prototype stoves in and out of the pot.  These scratches have not resulted in any noticeable problem with the pot.  The surface has not separated at the scratches and has not begun to peel. A full 6 months of using the pot with stainless steel tableware has not added any scratches.  

While out on the trail, I cooked many times directly in the pot instead of using plastic bags with closures.  I found the pots cleaned very well after cooking noodle dishes with no supplies other than a little dry dirt and humus.  A brief rinse of the dust after dry cleaning was all that I used (and it was not really required) before the next meal.  I needed to be very careful that the dirt and humus did not have any small rocks in it.  I had previously reported (in the Field Report) a scratch on the bottom of a pot when I tried this cleaning method and a small sharp stone was in the dirt I used.  

I did need to clean off an accumulated layer of wood smoke tar from the bottom of the pots.  To do this I placed the empty pot in a larger pot of boiling water to heat the tar on the bottom of the pot.  After boiling for several minutes, I was able to use a spatula to scrape off considerable black/brown tar.  The pot then was cleaned gently with steel wool and all the tar was removed without scraping any additional black coating off the outside of the pots.  

burned bottom of pot

Burned Bottom of Larger Pot

Over a period of 140 days of cooking breakfast over an electric range, I had no scratches or other problems with the inside of the pots.  However, one morning, while the water for oatmeal was boiling in the larger pot, I became quite involved reading my BGT email.  I was alerted by the smoke alarm that the water had boiled dry.  Smoke was rising from the bottom of the inside of the pot.  The aluminum was spared, but much of the coating on the inside had bubbled and burnt.  I scrubbed the bottom quite hard with steel wool, removing the burned coating, and leaving most of the bottom of the pot as bare aluminum.  It has remained quite functional despite the disaster.   

After burning the bottom of the pot, I began to consider ways to use the pots to bake bread on the trail.  I did several experiments with homemade versions of both dry and wet baking.  I made a shelf of hardware cloth to suspend a plastic bag of bread dough over boiling water and tried several recipes for "boiled bread" and cake.   

boil baker

Boil Baking Device

I then made a home-made version of Brasslite's TrailBaker, suspending an aluminum pie plate from three wires and heating the pot with an alcohol stove.  Finally I experimented with support rings or "crowns" made from aluminum flashing.  I used both the larger pot, and the smaller pot (with no scorching of the bottom) as a baking oven.  

foil baker

Foil Baker using "Crown Ring"

The most practical use of Mama's kitchen was to use the small pot, suspended by a "crown ring" inside the larger pot as an oven for bread and cake.  

mama's nest components

Mama's Nest Baker

Care must be used to keep the outside pot from getting too hot or scorching of the non-stick surface may occur.  When using an alcohol stove, the bottom of the pot reaches a temperature of about 350 F (177 C) as long as the stove is not allowed to overheat.  This temperature was measured with an infrared standoff thermometer. As long as the flame remains in a simmer mode, the temperature does not seem to damage the coating.  You may notice the two curved lines in the smaller pot above.  This was from the bottom of a "crown ring" melting into the finish when I did allow the stove to overheat. It has been inconsequential in the use of the pot.  However, if baking bread is important, then the possibility of scorching the bottom of the larger pan may be worth the risk. 

mama's nest together

Mama's Nest Baker assembled (except lid of larger pot)

The bread was absolutely wonderful.  Immediately upon finishing the baking experiments in November, I had to go on a diet to lose weight!

To say that I have enjoyed these tests with Mama's Kitchen is an understatement.  I have had a ball.  I hope the reader has learned about this equipment from the series of reports over the last six months.  I thank Tinman, AntiGravity Gear and BGT from the bottom of my hiking sandals to the top of my tarp for allowing me the opportunity to review this gear.  

PERSONAL BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

Rick Allnutt
50 Year old male
6' 0'' (183 cm) in height
190 lb (86 kg) in weight  (Temporarily 200 lb (91 kg) - all the fault of the cakes!)
Email address: rick at imrisk dot com
I live in Dayton, Ohio

BACKPACKING BACKGROUND
Over the last year, I have gone from being a heavy-weight (2 Duluth  Pack) canoe camper to a three season base pack weight of just under  10 lb (4.5 kg) and skin out weight of 20 lb (9 kg) for a 4 day, 3  night Appalachian Trail hike. I have become an intense advocate of hammock camping.  I have done much day hiking on the Ohio Buckeye Trail and the Ohio state forests.  Backpacking trips have included more than 200 miles of the AT across several section hikes in North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and New Hampshire.  Other historical experience includes 7 backcountry canoe trips into the Minnesota Boundary Waters Canoe Area spanning 35 years, and hiking the Philmont Scout ranch as a 14-year-old Eagle Scout.
 



Read more reviews of AntiGravityGear gear
Read more gear reviews by Rick Allnutt

Reviews > Cook Gear > Cook Sets > AntiGravityGear Mamas Kitchen Cookset > Rick Allnutt > Long Term Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson