![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Do It Yourself > Plans and Patterns > Cat Stove by Sargent Rock > Owner Review by C ONeillOwner Review DIY Gear – Cat Stove By Cory O’Neill May 8, 2006
Biographical
Information
Backpacking
Background
Product Information
Stove burner, stand, base and windscreen Stove assembled
Close-up of stove burner
Similar Products Used
Product Description The stove burner has a diameter of 3.5 inches (9 cm) and is 1.5 inches (4 cm) deep. The pot stand measures 5.5 inches (14 cm) across (diagonal) and 3 inches (7.5 cm) high, providing 1.5 inches (4 cm) of clearance between the top of the burner and the base of the pot. The windscreen has a diameter of 6.25 inches (16 cm) and stands 3.5 inches (9 cm) high. The base of the windscreen, 5.5 inches (14 cm) in diameter, is cut to slightly less than the inside diameter of the cooking pot.
Construction Review I had no problem locating any of the construction materials at my local Wal-mart except for the construction fabric and insulation. I picked up some insulation from a scrap construction pile while on a jog, and found some fabric in my garage. Purchasing a roll of fabric from a hardware store would cost about $6. My construction site was the bench in my garage. It took less than an hour to build the stove, using a church key, paper hole punch, scissors, pen and utility knife. I followed the instructions exactly, with these exceptions: I did not construct the simmer ring and top (I don’t ever simmer…just boil), and I decided to fold the lip of the windscreen back on itself to lock it into place instead of using a paper clip. I constructed my cat stove with my intended cooking pot in mind. My current pot has an inside diameter of 5.75 inches (14.5 cm) and a height of 4 inches (10 cm). As such, I cut the diameter of the windscreen base to a diameter 1/4 inch (.5 cm) less than the inner diameter of my pot. I also cut the height of the windscreen to 1/2 inch (1.25 cm) less than the inside height of my pot. This allows me to place the windscreen unfolded inside of the pot, like a liner, yet provides a 1/2 inch overlap above the base of the pot when the pot is sitting on the pot stand. Also, the windscreen diameter allows a necessary gap of approximately 1/4 inch (.5 cm) between the windscreen and pot side when the stove is fully assembled.
Field Use Packing: When packing the stove, I place the base of the windscreen in the pot, then slide the windscreen into the pot so that it expands all the way to the side of the pot. I then drop in the pot stand, and then squeeze our eating bowls (2-cup tupperware freezer containers) inside the stand. I then place the stove burner inside the freezer containers. This leaves me enough room to place matches and a pot scrubber (inside a zip-lock bag) on top of the burner before securing the top of the pot over the stove. I then place the packed pot/stove inside my backpack. Setup: Setting the stove up is not much different than setting up the standard backpacking stove, with the exception that additional thought needs to be given to finding a location that is wind-free. After locating a protected spot (behind a rock, tree, or even a tent), the windscreen base is placed on the ground. The stove and pot support are then placed on this base, and the windscreen is then wrapped around the pot support. Ignition: Two capfuls of a “typical” plastic Coke bottle cap are enough to provide 10 to 12 minutes of burn time. After pouring the capfuls of denatured alcohol directly in the middle of the stove, I use a match or a butane lighter to ignite the stove. Some practice without the windscreen and pot support in place was necessary before I was able to ignite the stove without singeing the hair on the back of my fingers. After ignition, the pot is placed on the stand, and cooking begins. Using more than a few capfuls of fuel at a time results in too hot a stove, which causes the fuel trapped in the fiberglass wick to boil. When this happens, I hear a "thup, thup" sound. Burn time is significantly reduced. As such, I have found that if longer cook times are required, I have to wait for the stove to cool (perhaps 10 seconds), then pour additional capfuls of fuel into the stove and relight the stove. Two of these "burns" are usually enough to boil 3 to 4 cups (.75 to 1 L) of water during July or August. Cooking/Heating: My typical routine for backcountry cuisine includes placing a pot of water on the stove, boiling the water, pouring in a dehydrated meal, and letting the pot sit for 20 minutes to rehydrate the meal. Sometimes, an additional “burn”, or re-ignition and re-boiling of the meal, is necessary to achieve a fully rehydrated meal. While the pot is boiling or sitting, I will often do other camp activities, and occasionally check the meal’s progress. I have found that the Cat Stove is ideal for this style of cooking. The stove generates more than enough heat to effectively bring even larger quantities of cold mountain water (or even snow!) to a rolling boil, and additional cooking can be achieved and controlled by limiting the amount of fuel added to the stove. My average fuel consumption is about 1.5 ounces (0.04 liters), or 3 capfuls, per day per person from July to October. Snow Melting: In early June of 2005, my son and I climbed to approximately 8,100 feet (2,500 m)on South Sister (Oregon) for an overnight. Temperatures ranged from 21 degrees Fahrenheit at night to about 45 degrees Fahrenheit (about -6 and +7 degrees Celsius) in the sun. We had a mix of snow, hail and sunshine throughout both days. Although we were able to set up camp on dry ground, we found no running water, and were forced to melt snow for drinking and cooking. I had considered this before leaving, and had packed a 12 fluid ounce (0.35 liter) Gatorade bottle with fuel for the trip. Melting the snow was a longer process, partly exacerbated by my small (2 quart) pot. Nonetheless, we were able to provide about 7 quarts of water (6.6 liters) over the two days, and used only 8.5 ounces (0.25 liters) of fuel. Conclusions: I am extremely satisfied with the Cat Stove. It has completely replaced my MSR on all non-winter trips. It fires up reliably every time, is compact and lightweight, and weighs almost a pound (0.45 kg) less--including stove and fuel container--than my MSR with the pump and aluminum fuel bottle. It fits nicely inside of my cooking pot, and is very easy to assemble. Although the stove heats water slower than my MSR and seems to use a bit more fuel, I have found these faults negligible, and will continue to use the Cat Stove for all of my three-season adventures.
Up-Side
Down-Side
Read more gear reviews by C ONeill Reviews > Do It Yourself > Plans and Patterns > Cat Stove by Sargent Rock > Owner Review by C ONeill | |||