![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Eye Protection > Sun Glasses > Smith Axis > Russell Curry > Field ReportFIELD
REPORT
SMITH OPTICS AXIS SUNGLASSES
Tester Biography:
Backpacking
Background:
Product Description: Frames - the "Grilamid TR90 Nylon Frame" is nicely finished, smooth and comfortable for me to wear. The temple arms will flex if forced, but will return to their original shape. The arms are slightly curved, tapered pieces, with the "Hydrophilic Megol nose/temple pads" at the nosepiece and the arms where contact is made with my temples. This "Hydrophilic Megol" material feels similar to hard rubber. I can feel it grabbing my skin when I pass my finger over the material. I notice that the Hydrophilic material is only on the outside and top and lower edge of the temple arms and does not extend completely around. I do have some concerns on how this is going to work on very strenuous activities and whether these pieces will endure severe conditions. (More on this to follow) Lenses - the curved lenses for the Axis glasses are easily interchangeable. For the Axis model, there are 16 different sets available, from clear to Polarized, with many different colors to choose from. The variable light transmitted (VLT) is indicated on the Smith website for each lens, with the clear showing 98% penetrating at the high end, and the Dielectric Blue, Polarized Platinum Mirror, and Polarized Bronze Mirror coming in the lowest at 12%. The lenses provide 100% UVA/B/C protection and incorporate the "Tapered lens Technology" for optimized viewing. Smith Optics claims the "Carbonic Lens" is the most impact resistant lens material in the world. As can be expected from any colored lens, the view reflects the lens color and the amount of light penetrating the lens. Take a look at these shots and you can get a minimalist idea. The camera was set to a specific mode scene and was not changed. No changes other than cropping were done to the photographs. No lens in the frame Platinum lens
RC36 Rose Copper Yellow The view presented in real life for each lens is much better than the picture shows. The Platinum lens does a good job of reflecting glare, the RC36 lens sharpens and clarifies outdoor views, where glare is at a minimum, and the Yellow enhances available light. The optical quality appears very good to me, no matter where I look through the lens I see a sharp image. FIELD CONDITIONS
I have used the glasses, with the various lens combinations, just
about every time I am outdoors for any length of time. This has been when
driving in the bright sun and rain, when driving
before sunrise and after sunset, while hiking along the beach, riding
my bike, canoeing, working outdoors on trail maintenance or while
working on my lawn and garden, attending my outdoor family reunion at
Easter and many other times for all types of activities. I even
put them on one day for
safety glasses when I had to cut up several sheets of OSB (Oriented
Strand Plyboard) with my circular saw for a honey-do around the house.
They are not safety glasses, but they did keep the dust from my eyes
when I used them this way. I don't even take them off when going
shopping indoors. The Platinum lens that I use to drive with
conceals my eyes enough to do the people-watching thing at the mall,
not
to mention that I had a couple ask me where I got the glasses
from. I just told them Smith Optics and when I went to the Smith Optics
website, there was a dealer locater link that found a retailer in my
local mall. The temperatures have ranged from 20 F (-7 C) to 80 F (27 C).
Humidity has ranged from 30% to 90%. Weather conditions have varied from hard
rain to cloudy skies, to bright sunny days, dusty conditions on my biking
trail, to high wind gusts at my local beach. FIELD
REPORT Changing the lenses has become very easy after doing it a few times. The biggest drawback is that I get oil from my fingerprints on the lenses and have to clean them with an optical quality cloth to prevent them from becoming scratched. I was not used to carrying around a cleaning cloth for my sunglasses, I always used paper tissues, or sometimes my micro fiber riding or hiking shirt. Of course, that was with the $10 throw away glasses I bought from my local discounter. I had an optical cleaning cloth from my reading glasses and now keep that handy for the sunglasses. I like that if I do scratch a lens, I can order new ones and keep the frames, instead of throwing away everything and having to "break in" a different pair of shades every few months or so. On my Initial Report, I indicated that I would be testing these glasses on several scenarios. "How do the glasses perform on strenuous hikes or other outdoor activity"? "How well do the glasses stay on my head, especially when jogging, hiking or doing other activity"? I gave these sunglasses and especially the "Hydrophilic Megol nose/temple pads" a really good test on a 50 mile (81 km) bicycle ride. I was a little skeptical at first that the glasses would not slip on my nose, as my other glasses had done so many times, often requiring me to completely remove them when perspiring heavily for extended periods. I had no problems with these glasses slipping during my ride. They stayed snug to my head and the bridge of my nose. I am not quite sure how this works, but even when I try to make the glasses slip on my nose, they stay in place. The inside of the lenses became wet during my ride from sweat coming from my eyebrows and forehead. If the buildup was excessive, I would remove the glasses briefly while riding and allow the moisture to dry. They perform better than anything else I have ever used for sunglasses while undertaking this particular strenuous activity. Just the fact that the nose pad and temple pads do not slip while sweating profusely is a major draw for me. I found myself deliberately trying to shake these glasses off of my head one day after hiking a few miles in the park. I couldn't do it. I can make them feel a little looser, but no matter how much I jog, shake my head up or down, sideways, twist, turn or jump, the glasses stay pretty secure to my head. Those little nose and temple pads really do grip. "What happens under high humidity situations with the glasses, do they fog easily"? Well, yes the lenses do fog up under high humidity conditions. The humidity in my little corner of the world averages 70% and better, especially in the summer. When I go outside from my cool, air-conditioned rooms to the oppressive humidity of the Gulf Coast, lenses do fog up. They seem to clear rather quickly once the temperatures equalize, but it is just a fact that glasses down here get a little steamy once in awhile. I noticed though that the nylon frames do not seem to get as cold or hold the cold temperatures as much as my old metal frames. This could also explain why they clear of condensation quicker than my old metal frame sunshades. "Is there going to be a problem with the hinges working loose, or the screw coming loose and falling out"? Close examination of the hinge pin with a magnifier reveals a cross-shaped pin that does not accept my usual tiny screwdriver that I keep to tighten the screw on my readers. After this examination, I am satisfied that the pin is secure, though by what exact means I do not know. I intend to put the nylon frames to the stress test, and determine if they can withstand rough handling, bending, flexing and pulling forces. I will determine if bending, flexing or dropping the frames will cause the lenses to pop out. The frames appear rather stout in their construction, and while I can flex the arms a little, the frame around the lenses is much less flexible. The nose piece measures 7/16" (11 mm) top to bottom, and 1/4" (6mm) thick. If I twist the frames back and forth, I can get a lens to pop out. The way that I normally handle the glasses though, putting them on and off, folding, or putting into the cases, etc., has not caused a failure of the lens popping out of the frame. The black part of the "Camo" finish on my frames appears to be applied by some method, and will scratch off, leaving a solid white base. I cannot scratch the finish off with my fingernail, I had to use a razor knife to get it to come off. The finish appears durable, and so far it has sustained its appearance and shown no signs of wear. Further testing during the next 4 months will bear on this.
In preparation for a local outdoor trip, I decided that I would try the same necklaces that I use on my other sunglasses on the Axis glasses. The necklace is the type that has a loop that the arm fits through, and then the loop is tightened by sliding a clasp to close the loop. This type of necklace worked fine, but because the temple arms have only a slight bow to them, the loop of the necklace touches the sides of my temples. When putting on this necklace, I was positioning the loop on the temple arm just above the spot where the "Hydrophilic Megol temple pads" end approximately mid-frame. I noticed that the end of the temple pad seemed to be sticking up a little. Further examination showed that the temple pad was loose at this point, and that some type of adhesive is used to secure the pads. The adhesive holding the "Hydrophilic Megol" pad had failed on one of the temple arms of my glasses. When I rubbed gently on this pad the temple pad fell off completely. There is a groove on the outside of the arm to align the pad with. The grooves in the temple arms are not enough to hold the pad on without adhesive, so now I have the problem of the temple pad falling off every time I handle the glasses. I do not know if this failure is from the 50 mile (81 km) ride, excessive exposure to moisture or heat or some other cause. This failure makes the other temple pad and nosepieces highly suspect on how they are going to fare, especially if I am wearing them during some strenuous activity outdoors. The remaining temple pad and nose pieces appear firmly fastened at this point. I am basically unable to continue with these frames with the pad dislodged from the temple arm. Per the warranty directions on the website, I boxed up the frames along with the temple pad and mailed it off to the address provided on the Smith Optics Website. I did phone and was able to talk to a person about the failure, who told me to return the frames. I had also sent an email on Friday to the link on the Smith Optics website. I received a reply to my email the next business day, (Monday), after talking to the customer rep and after I had already shipped the frames back to Smith Optics. Eric Carlson, of Smith Optics, indicated "We believe it is an isolated incident and would like to get you a new pair that has the properly affixed temple pad." I received the new frames from Eric within one week of sending in the old frames. I must say that the customer service was very professional, Smith Optics immediately shipped out the new frames before they had even received the old frames that I returned via USPS and followed up with an email to me when the frames were shipped as well as an apology for the problems I was having with the old frames. Since the failure occurred shortly after a 50 mile (81 km) bike road trip in moderate heat and humidity, I decided to repeat that trip with the new glasses, but this time I would bike 100 miles (161 km) over two days in even warmer temperatures and higher humidity. I was tired at the end of the second day, and to further remove the suspicion I had about the failure of the temple pad, I crawled into my spa tub for a long, relaxing whirlpool massage. I wore the glasses the whole time, with hot water splashing over the glasses and the steam from the water filling the room. At the end of all of this, the nose and temple pads were firmly affixed and I could detect no loosening of either. I have since done two 4-day hikes in temperatures averaging 80 F (27 C) wearing these glasses and also have begun my training rides on my bike of 15 miles (24 km) twice per day. I have had no failures with the temple pads and am of the opinion that this probably was "an isolated incident" as suggested by Eric of Smith Optics. I carried the Smith Optics glasses on a 3-week hiking trip to Europe in April and May of 2005. The weather conditions varied from a low of 45 F (7C) to a high of 75 F (24 C), at elevations to 3000 ft (915 m). During all this time hiking, and traveling between base camps, side trips, road trips, and climbs, the glasses performed magnificently. I have had no failures with the temple pads. The glasses stay firmly mounted on my face, they held up to repeated handling, being removed and carried in my pack, or hanging around my neck from my necklaces. They survived being stuffed into my duffels on my flights with other heavier gear, with no signs of any wear or failures. At no time did a lens ever come loose from the frames. LIKES Comfortable to wear Lightweight The wraparound style of the lenses does a good job of protecting my eyes in dusty conditions Durable frames - hold up well to heavy use Stay firmly affixed to my face, even under hot conditions and during periods of heavy physical activity DISLIKES The size of the case required to carry the glasses and extra lenses is somewhat bulky An optical quality lens cleaning cloth is required to clean the lens, ( a bit of a nuisance, but is easy to get used to) Thanks to Smith Optics and BackPackGearTest for awarding me this review. Russell Curry Read more reviews of Smith gear Read more gear reviews by Russell Curry Reviews > Eye Protection > Sun Glasses > Smith Axis > Russell Curry > Field Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||