BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Footwear > Boots > Zamberlan Ouray Hiking Boot > Owner Review by Edwin L. Morse

Owner Review

Zamberlan Ouray Hiking Boots
Ed Morse
July 10, 2006

Name: Edwin Morse
Age:     68
Gender: male
Height: 5' 8" (173 cm)
Weight: 143 lb  (65 kg)
Email address: ed.morse@charter.net
City, State, Country: Grawn, Michigan,  USA

Backpacking background:
I started backpacking in 1979, with two weeks in northern Michigan. My gear was cheap and sometimes painfully heavy. Starting pack weight was just over 70 lb (32 kg), with food but no water. Since the first trip I have backpacked in Michigan, Maine, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania and one trip to Canada. After about 12 years I started slowly reducing my pack weight. The last trip in New Hampshire my pack, including food and water, was 35 lb (16 kg) for a week. Amazing what a change of attitude can do. Slowly obtaining lighter gear. I only know what works by trial and error.

Product Information

Manufacturer: Zamberlan
Year of Manufacture: not sure, before 1995
URL: http://www.zamberlan.com/
Listed weight: N/A, my boots were purchased about 12 years ago. There have been changes
Delivered weight:
Weight with Superfeet insoles: 61.9oz, or 3 lb 13.9 oz (1755 g) for the pair, as I wear the shoes.

This is the present model of the boots I have been using for about 12 years. The Ouray model is listed under the general heading of Backpacking.  The Zamberlan website shows a nice picture, but only a side view. I would have preferred a picture that also shows the sole of the boot.

2006 model of Zamberlan Ouray boots


Zamberlan Ouray boots and specifications from Zamberlan website

UPPER:     HYDROBLOC NABUK LEATHER
UPPER PROTECTION:     R.R.S. "RUBBER REINFORCEMENT SYSTEM"
HARDWARE:     H.R.T. HIGH RESISTANCE TREATMENT
LINING:     GORE-TEX
FOOTBED:     ZAMBERLAN FOOTBED
PADDING:     Z.A.S. - ZAMBERLAN AIR SYSTEM
MIDSOLE/SHANK:     ZAMBERLAN MODULAR FLEX GT
TOE AND HEEL:     THERMOPLASTIC
SOLE:     ZAMBERLAN VIBRAM 3D
CONSTRUCTION:     GTX BOOTEE
WOMEN'S VERSION:     WOMEN'S VERSION NOT AVAILABLE, UNISEX FIT ONLY
CARE AND MAINTENANCE:     HYDROBLOC PROOFING CONDITIONER
COLOR:     BROWN 

Field use - My experience

I bought my Zamberlan Ouray boots at the REI store in Northville, MI. I think I tried on nearly every waterproof hiking boot they had in the store. I have worn my Zamberlan boots on week long backpack trips in Maine, Pennsylvania and Canada. On all three of these trips the terrain alternated between a path in the forest and rocks. 

The Maine trip was one of the few we have done in August but that was when the youngest son could get off work. I bought the boots 2 months before our trip and wore them on walks from 4 mi (6.4 km) after work to 12 mi (19.3 km) long day hikes on weekends. This trail was about equally spruce forests and very rocky nearly open hills. It was hot with lots of mosquitoes and a few black flies. We only had one day of rain so the new boots had a fairly easy trip. I had no blisters and no sore feet. 

The Pennsylvania trip I remember mostly for rocks. There were 2 days when we were mostly hiking through rock fields. These rocks varied in size from softball size to about twice the size of a basketball. I found I could make the best time with the least effort by stepping from rock to rock. The thick Vibram soles made a good platform on the rocks. Then I got to sit down and rest while my son caught up with me. We had no rain that trip but heavy dew every morning. This left all the underbrush nearly as wet as rain would have. My feet stayed dry and comfortable.

My last backpacking trip with the Zamberlans was in Pukasqua National Park in Canada. This is about 100 miles (161 km) west of Sault Ste Marie on the north shore of Lake Superior. We went the third week in October, much later in the year than I wanted to be in Canada. Our tent had been over-used and should have been replaced before the trip. Other than that we thought we were prepared for fall weather. The trail we followed was not marked in the forest at all. It was just a path. Out on the rocks along the shore of Lake Superior the  route was marked with rock cairns. Sometimes we could see from cairn to cairn and sometimes we had to search for the next one. We were having a good time with a great hike. The third night away from the car started with an incredible experience. We stood on a rock (bigger than my car) and watched the northern lights for over an hour, until my feet got too cold. Went to bed to get warm. We had seen northern lights before but never a display that covered nearly half the sky and lasted so long.

My son woke me hours later. It had been snowing and our tent was starting to sag from the weight. We got up to clean the snow off the tent and then had to shake it off again about every hour until dawn. The tent zipper failed during the night. We were able to make it work part time, not good for when it was snowing. We were well prepared for cold and rainy weather - not snow! We woke to over a foot (30 cm) of snow and a cold morning. Had to put on all the clothes we had to keep warm enough to fix breakfast and pack up. While doing this we discussed what to do. My son really wanted to keep going. I did too but finally decided going back was more sensible because our equipment just wasn't good enough for winter. I was worried about two things, getting more snow and the hazards of following the trail on the rocks along the lake.  It did continue to snow until about noon. We made the hike out in two days instead of three. 

I decided the Zamberlan boots were worth more than I had paid for them. Hiking in snow is truly a test for leather boots. My feet did not get wet, just damp from sweat. High water proof gaiters kept and wet snow out of the tops of the boots.  

The next trip I started getting my pack weight lower and switched to trail runners for backpacking and most day hikes. For the last eight years I have  used the Zamberlans for day hikes in wet sloppy snow or for bush whacking in rough terrain and heavy undergrowth. 

my well worn boots
My well worn boots

Here is a picture of my Zamberlan boots as they look today. 


Yes, they are due for leather treatment again. Depending on weather and usage I usually treat the leather two or 3 times a year. I used snowseal for several years and recently switched to Nikwax. I don't see much difference. I always brush off (or hose off) the mud when I get home if that is what I hiked in. Mostly I hike with these boots in spring and fall when the snow is wet and not deep enough for skiing. The lug soles are showing some wear and the leather is getting a little scratched. If these boots ever wear out I will make the trip to REI to get another pair, with the improvements of the newer model.


Summary

The Zamberlan Ouray boots are well made sturdy hiking boots. They have treated me much better than I have treated them. In the last 30 years I've owned at least 8 pairs of all leather hiking boots, including three others that were Goretex lined. No other boot has served me as well as these have.

Things I like:

1. These boots fit my feet.
2. Comfort - these are the most comfortable hiking boots I have owned.
3. Waterproof - never had wet feet from the boots soaking through.
4. Dependable - any time I put them on to hike they feel good.

Things I don't like:

1. They are heavy - weigh twice as much as trail runners.
2. They are warm - too warm if the temperature is above 40 F (4 C).
3. Both boots squeak when I let the leather get too dry. In this case, the squeaking boots get the grease.



Read more reviews of Zamberlan gear
Read more gear reviews by Edwin L. Morse

Reviews > Footwear > Boots > Zamberlan Ouray Hiking Boot > Owner Review by Edwin L. Morse



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson