![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Footwear > Care Products > Atsko Sno-Seal > Kathryn Doiron > Field ReportAtsko Sno-Seal - Field ReportFebruary 5th 2006Personal Information: Name: Kathryn Doiron Age: 29 Gender: Female Height: 1.7 m (5' 8") Weight: 68 kg (150 lb) Email: kdoiron 'at' gmail 'dot' com Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada Brief Background: I started backpacking and hiking seriously almost four years ago. Most of my miles have been logged in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. I have recently finished 1200+ miles of the Appalachian trail. My style is to be as light as possible while not spending a fortune. My pack weight tends to hover around 25lbs. I have recently starting getting into winter hiking and snowshoeing. Atsko Sno-SealManufacturer: Atsko Material: Beeswax paste - Made in USA Website: http://www.atsko.com MSRP: US$6.95 Weight (as stated): 8 oz (226 g) Weight (measured - product + jar): 8.6 oz (241 g) Applied to: Asolo GoreTex boot, Born shoes Field Report: I applied the paste to one hiking boot and a pair of shoes. After
application and buffing, there was a slightly tacky feeling to the
boot and shoes. After wearing the boot and shoes several times, I noticed that the tacky feeling did diminish quickly. After three months, I can not tell by feel which boot
was treated. The first time the footwear was worn outside, in the
cold weather, there was a slight opaque residue where excess Sno-Seal
remained after buffing. After several wears, this opaque residue also
disappeared. After three months, there are no noticeable signs of
deterioration of the Sno-Seal's protective coating. I have observed
that the badly scuffed toe has developed a nice brown sheen that
resembles the rest of the boot and the damage is barely discernible.
As I only applied the Sno-Seal to one hiking boot, I was able to
compare the performance of the Sno-Seal to an untreated boot. The
boots themselves did not show any signs of leakage, but the toes of
the boots were very badly scuffed before treatment. The treated boot
looks almost new whereas the non-treated boot looks trashed. The
trashed toe did, in fact, absorb water, whereas on the treated boot's
toe I did not notice any signs of water absorption. The Sno-Seal
treated boot retained less snow on the surface and less water as the
beads were more likely to fall off after stamping my feet. The
untreated boot retained more water and snow on the surface that was
harder to remove by simply stomping my foot.
The boots were more intensively tested than the shoes as I wore them
to work every day for at least the last two months. Conditions routinely encountered included slush, snow and ice, with a quick trek through a park with no gain in elevation. Temperatures ahve varied from just above freezing to -20 C (-4 F). I took the boots snowshoeing in heavy wet snow where the temperature was about 4 C (39 F). There was very little elevation gain and I was near sea level. I have purposely encountered deep puddles of slush and cold rain water as well as slogging through snow. I will continue to go out of my way to go through puddles. I will also look into how well they preform under
muddy conditions come the spring.
My test plan for the remaining three months will be to treat the other
boot and compare a fresh application to a three month old application
to determine how long one appliaction lasts. I will continue to walk
through puddles and will take to the hills. I will also look at how
well the Sno-Seal repells mud come spring.
Cons:
Read more reviews of Atsko gear Read more gear reviews by Kathryn Doiron Reviews > Footwear > Care Products > Atsko Sno-Seal > Kathryn Doiron > Field Report | |||