BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Footwear > Footbeds and Insoles > Shock Doctor Ultra 2 Insoles > Andrew Priest > Long Term Report

SHOCK DOCTOR ULTRA 2 FOOTBEDS

Shock Doctor Ultra2 inserts

Long-term Report
November 24, 2004

Table of Contents


Andrew Priest, Tester and Author of this Report
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
aushiker@yahoo.com.au

I am a 45 years old male, 180 cm (5' 11") in height and I weigh 100 kg (220 lbs)I  have been hiking in Western Australia for approximately five years. For the past four  years I have been regularly walking and now leading walks with the Perth Bushwalkers Club. These bushwalks range from all on-track to all off-track pack-carries. I consider myself as moving towards being a lightweight tent-carrying bushwalker with my pack base weight in the 8 to 12 kg (18 to 26 lb) range.  In 2003 I completed my End to End of the Bibbulmun Track. I have also end to ended the Cape to Cape Track and the Coastal Plains Walk Track.
[Click here to return to the top]

Information about the Shock Doctor Ultra2 Footbeds

Description, year of manufacturer and MSRP: The Ultra2 footbeds were manufactured in Korea in 2004 by Shock Doctor Inc. At the time of writing this report, there was no MSRP on the website. The Shock Doctor Ultra2 are footbeds, and bright orange ones at that. Shock Doctor describes them as featuring a design which forms to the heel, midfoot, forefoot and toe area to provide maximum support and comfort. The footbeds also incorporate an integrated, full-length injection molded chassis with CONTROL BAR [which] stabilizes the heel and controls pronation and on it goes. In summary Shock Doctor highlight a number of features of the Ultra2. They are (minus the marketing jargon):

  • Stabilised heel and pronation;

  • Support for high, medium and low arches;

  • Metatarsal support to relax the foot and help relieve Plantar Fasciitis pain;

  • Shock absorbing under the heel, arch, midfoot and ball of foot;

  • Surface material designed to reduce friction and control odour;

  • Temperature control ... cool when it's hot and warm when it's cool.

More specific details on the design of the footbeds can be found in my Initial Report.


Weights and Measurements:  No weights for the Ultra2 can be found on the manufacturer's website. My weight, as recorded by my Arlec kitchen digital scales for the pair of men's US size 9.5 - 10.5 / women's US size 10.5 - 11.5 footbeds, is 150 g (5.5 oz). The US sizes equate to 8.5 - 9.5 UK; 43 44.4 European; and 27 - 28.5 Mondo.
[Click here to return to the top]

My Long-term Experience Using the Shock Doctor Ultra2 Footbeds in the Field

Testing Location Overview:  The hiking environment of the south-west of Western Australia allows for hiking and backpacking from coastal plains to forest. Elevation ranges from 0 to 585 metres (0 to 1,920 feet). Within this region, I hike in varying conditions from forestry roads, to sandy tracks to single-purpose walking trails, to rock hopping, to beach walking to completely off-track walking through open and dense country.

[Click here to return to the top]

Weather Conditions: During the summer period, daytime temperatures average 30° C (86° F), whereas from March through to December the daytime average temperatures range from 15° C to 26° C (59° F to 79° F). During the autumn, winter, and spring periods the normal weather pattern is fairly wet with frequent heavy rainstorms evident. It does not normally snow in Western Australia.

According to The Times Atlas of the World (Concise Edition - Revised 1997) our weather is described as being "Mediterranean - rainy climates with mild winters, coolest month above 0° C (32° F), but below 18° C (64° F); warmest month above 10° C (50° F)." The atlas depicts the coastal area north of Los Angeles as having the same climate.

[Click here to return to the top]

Long-term experience

Since receiving the Shock Doctor Ultra2 footbeds I have pretty much worn them daily in my New Balance 805 trail runners and I have worn them in my Scarpa Manta boots on four separate weekend bushwalks. Details of the first three weekend bushwalks can be found in my field report. The last walk in the Scarpa Mantas was a 40 km (25 mi) walk in Beavis block carrying about 14 kg (31 lb). The surface walked on was mainly jeep tracks and hand-cut trails. All of a limestone/gravel type surface.

In respect of using the Ultra2 in my New Balance 805s, my walking has been more of the day to day kind, that is around home, around the neighbourhood, down to the shops, as well as regular exercise walks around Lake Monger, which are approximately 5 km (3 mi) in length. More recently this has been extended to walking to and from work and geocaching walks. The walks to and from work range from 5 km to 9 km (3 mi to 6 mi) each way depending on direction taken. The geocaching is generally around 5 to 8 km (3 mi to 5 mi) over the game. The walking with the 805s has been on a range of surfaces such as concrete or bitumen paths, limestone tracks and sand tracks.

In my Initial Report I went into detail about the various features of the footbeds and the claims against these features. Normally I would revisit those claims in this report, however, I am of the opinion that the claims are of such a nature, that I can not fairly report on them, i.e., they are technical claims for which I do not have the technical knowledge to support my comments. Therefore, what follows is my laypersons' reporting of my experience with the footbeds.

First up, using them in the New Balance 805s trail runners. To fit them to the trail runners, I first removed the original inserts and replaced them with the Ultra2. I have found that the Ultra2 fit snugly in the 805s, so the sizing has been good. My initial concerns about the height of the footbeds have proved unfounded. As reported in my Field Report, I am very happy with the comfort and support that the footbeds provide when used in my trail runners. That view remains.

In my field report, I stated "the same cannot be said, of their use in my Scarpa Manta boots. My first outing with the footbeds in my boots resulted in blisters on the sole of my foot and on my heel. My initial thoughts where that the height of the footbeds had relocated my feet such that they where rubbing against boots in a new position and Scarpa boots being Scarpa boots they inflicted blisters upon me. However on my second outing with the footbeds in my boots, I wore relatively new socks and guess what! No blisters on the first day's walking, the longest walk distance. Due to wet weather, i.e., wet socks, on the second day of the walk, I switched to an older pair of socks (same pair worn on the previous weekend walk) and back the blisters came. This was after only walking 5 km (3 mi). So it would seem that I had been a bit quick in coming to the view that the footbeds where the guilty party, rather it seems that my old socks where the problem. To clarify what was happening, on the third weekend's walk, I wore brand new socks with the footbeds in the Scarpa boots. Outcome no blisters! So the footbeds have come through okay on this aspect."

Following the posting of the field report, the manufacturer made the following comment:

"Alas, as for Andrew Priest's test I can't gauge the size differential other than a snug good fit in the New Balance shoes. I am disappointed in the fatigue factor when used in the Scarpa hiking boot. If the boot is smaller than the shoes, that could be an issue. As always individuals and their specific needs and results differ and one footbed can't work for everybody."

I thought fair point and decided to double check the Shock Doctor's sizing against my other inserts. I could determine no difference in sizing. Okay, I felt it was then important to give them a second chance and wore my Scarpa Mantas with the Shock Doctor footbeds on the Beavis block walk. Unfortunately, the Shock Doctors, my Scarpa Mantas and my feet just don't go together. Once again, I got very sore feet early into day one and saw no improvement over the remainder of the weekend. By the end of the walk, the soles of my feet where very sore, worse in my view than my experience with the standard Scarpa inserts.

In summary, I find the Ultra2 footbeds more than adequate when worn in my New Balance 805s and would suggest they are an improvement over the original inserts. However, when fitted to my much heavier Scarpa Manta boots, the performance of the Ultra2 footbeds  has been less that ideal, particularly when my walking involves hard surfaces (on-track road surfaces in the main). I suspect, but cannot be 100% certain, that the weight of the boots may have some bearing on my experience.

One final comment. I have not had any bad odour experiences with the Shock Doctors. I note from the website that they can be washed, but have not felt the need to do so, and have received no adverse comments from others!

The above notwithstanding, I will continue using the footbeds in my trail runners but will not be using the Shock Doctors in my boots.

[Click here to return to the top]

Thanks to Shock Doctor and BackpackGearTest.org for the opportunity to participate in this test.

[Click here to return to the top]




Read more reviews of Shock Doctor gear
Read more gear reviews by Andrew Priest

Reviews > Footwear > Footbeds and Insoles > Shock Doctor Ultra 2 Insoles > Andrew Priest > Long Term Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson