BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Footwear > Sandals > Keen Taos > Rami Benhameda > Field Report

KEEN

TAOS

FIELD REPORT

BY RAMI BENHAMEDA

2 AUGUST 2005

http://www.keenfootwear.com

 


 

Index

1. Tester Information

2. Product Information

3. Field Testing Results

4. Further Testing Plan

My Keen Taos (and a rubber logo thingy)


 Back to Top =

Tester Information

Name: Rami Benhameda
Age: 37
Height: 5' 11" (1.8 m)
Weight: 205 lb (93 kg)
Gender: Male
Shoe Size: 10.5 EE U.S.
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
E-Mail: rbenhameda@comcast.net

 

Backpacking Background

I've been hiking and backpacking in and around Central and Southern Indiana for the past 20+ years either solo or with my wife and daughters. Within the last 5 years, I've become an avid long distance hiker with sections of the AT in Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia under my belt, as well as other long distance hiking. In 2000 I began trying to find ways to lighten my backpack in order to have a more enjoyable hike. I continue with this process today and have managed to bring my solo base Summer pack weight down to the range of 10 to 15 lb (4.5 - 6.8 kg)
 
Additional Pertinent Information:

Within the last year or so, I have become more interested in paddle sports.  My specific interest lies mainly towards kayaks of the touring class and canoe of similar purpose, but really any water and any boat will do. I am scheduled to learn white water kayaking from a friend over the course of this summer.

In addition to my growing interest in paddle sports, I have also gained an appreciation for running. Specifically, my interest in cross-country or trail running is one of the main reasons I became interested in testing the Taos sandals.

With my interest in lightening my pack weight, water sports, trail running, and with my existing affinity for my Keen Newport H2's, I was quite excited to see this test call and look forward eagerly to thoroughly exploring all that the Taos sandals have to offer.

 


 Back to Top =

Product Description

Manufacturer:

Keen Footwear
URL: http://www.keenfootwear.com
Year of Manufacture: 2005
Weight (as listed): 11 oz (312 g) per shoe
Weight (as measured by me): 12 oz (340 g) per shoe
Selected color combination: Bison / Red Rock
Materials: Part synthetic (nylon, elastic, carbon rubber, mesh) Part natural (leather)
MSRP: $99.99 USD
From the Website:

The Taos elevates performance footwear to the next level.  It combines all of the support and function one would expect from a  functional trail shoe with the open breathability of a sandal and Keen's patented toe protection.  This redefines the meaning of Hybrid.

Features and Benefits

  1. Waterproof Leather, Mesh and Webbing upper; Encapsulates the foot, functioning as a sandal.
  2. Patent-pending Dual-density EVA Midsole/ Shank; Provides balanced support and toe off.
  3. Non-marking, deep Lug Carbon Rubber Outsole; Excellent traction in loose dirt, scree, or rock.
  4. Secure-fit Lace Capture System; Integrates lacing with foot to prevent heel slip.
  5. Metatomical, Removable Footbed; Cushioning under foot, accommodates orthotics.

From Me:

The Taos I am testing are size 10.5 (U.S.) and are in color combination Red/Bison.

 

 


 Back to Top =

FIELD TESTING RESULTS

General:

I have been using the Keen Taos almost exclusively since May and have found them to be a very versatile, comfortable, stable shoe for all of my activities.  There are two minor issues I have had with the fit and performance of the Taos, but these are not show stopping issues so the impact is negligible 

Some additional findings relating to comments I made in my Initial Report;

In my I.R., I said "I am slightly skeptical about the ability of the bungee style elastic cord to snugly hold the shoe around my foot over the course of several long trail runs or a week of backpacking, but I'll let the proof be in the testing."

But my experience has been highly positive in regard to the ability of the bungee to keep the shoes snuggly fit to my feet in all environments.  In fact, there have been a couple of instances where I had the shoes too tight.

I also said "Two final notes about the fit of the Taos before I move on to my testing plan; When I first wore the Taos I was slightly disappointed that the strap that wraps around the heel doesn't provide more active adjustability in locking my heel into the shoe*.  This was easy enough to compensate for by kicking my heel down firmly into the heel cup and then cinching the bungee tight to hold my foot in place." and "Also, when I wore the Taos without socks one afternoon, I got a small blister on the outside of my small toe.  The stitching is the culprit*.  My small toe hits a part of the shoe where the stitching holds the edge covering in place.  The slight movement of my toe across this stitching rubbed the blister into life."

* The quotes above are from my Initial report and included references to photos which illustrated the issues I refer to.  For the complete quote in context and to view the photos, please click on the link see my Keen Taos Initial Report.

In my subsequent months of testing since making these two comments, I have not had any additional issues with either aspect of the fit of the Taos.  The heel cup provides sufficient fit and support for all of my activities, and while I seldom wear the Taos without socks, the times I have done so have been blister free. 

Finally, the two issues I mentioned earlier in my report.  First, the Taos are fairly slow to dry.  This has been problematic if I am trail running or simply irritating if I am canoeing or kayaking. 

The other issue has been a bit of a surprise for me.  This issue started to come to light early enough in my testing for it to be mentioned, or a symptom of the actual issue, in my Initial Report.  Despite having feet that measure to a size 10.5 (U.S.) I have discovered that I can easily and comfortably wear a size 10 in the Taos.  I mentioned in my I.R. that I was disappointed that the heel strap did not actually tighten the heel cup.  This nagged at my attention from time to time throughout my testing to date.  A few weeks ago I absent-mindedly tapped my toes down into the toe box of the shoes and noticed the 1/2 inch gap between my heel and the back of the shoe.  This sparked an insight which eventually led me to try on a pair of Taos in size 10 (U.S.) and I discovered that they fit comfortably.  As an adult, I've never been able to get my feet into a size 10 shoe so this discovery came as quite a surprise to me as you might suspect.  I did not wear the size 10's long enough to be able to say that they were a better fit than the size 10.5's and since I was completely happy with the size 10.5's I didn't pursue any change. 

As I sad at the beginning of this section, both the drying time and the sizing are very minor issues.  They are not things I consider to be problems, but rather aspects of the shoes fit and performance which I did not expect to be present.

In my Initial Report, I mentioned that I would be paying attention to specific areas of the Taos during my testing.  I have listed those areas and my current findings in red below each point.

My focus for the testing process will be geared towards two main focus areas;  first is general use and second is technical performance.

In both areas, I will be paying attention to the following areas:

  • how much wear is showing? (outsole, leather, bungee, etc.)

Almost no wear is showing on the Taos.  They are holding up quite well.

  • how is the removable footbed holding up to constant use? 

The footbed(s) are also holding up quite well.  I intend to write to Keen to inquire about the intended life of the Taos footbeds.

  • Is the stitching/ construction holding?

Again, quite well.  No wear or breakdown is showing.

In the general use area, I will be paying attention to the following areas specifically:

  • hotspots/ blisters

Just the one on my small toe that I mentioned in the I.R.

  • heel slip

No issues here either. 

  • bungee performance

The bungee straps on both shoes are performing perfectly.

  • COMFORT!

The Taos are fantastically comfortable.  I have been wearing them nearly 6 days a week and continue to be pleased with their comfort.

  • overall appearance

No significant change since new so the appearance of the Taos has not been an issue either.

In technical tasks, I will be paying attention to the following areas specifically:

  • when canoeing and kayaking, do the Taos shed water adequately or do they absorb an excessive amount of water?
  • when hiking/ running in wet conditions do the Taos adequately release water from the interior of the shoe?

These points were not what I had hoped they would be but as I mentioned in the previous section, have not been what I consider a failure.

  • When backpacking on rough conditions, is there enough support provided by the bungee style closure system to provide a secure fit?

The support the Taos provide is exactly what I look for in a trail runner.  I am completely satisfied.

  • does the blister causing seam affect my backpacking even though I'm wearing socks?

As I mentioned above, no more blisters.  Not even when I've worn the Taos without socks.

 

 


 Back to Top =

Further Testing Plan

For the remainder of this test, I will be continue to use the keen Taos as my primary footwear choice for most activities. 

I will seek information from Keen regarding the expected life of the removable footbeds and detail what I find in my Long term report.  I will continue to focus on wear, fit finish and performance of all aspects of the Taos.  In addition, I will be aware of any other issues which may present during this final phase of testing.

 

Thank you Keen Footwear and Backpack Gear Test for the opportunity to participate in this test series.

 

Rami Benhameda

 



Read more reviews of Keen gear
Read more gear reviews by Rami Benhameda

Reviews > Footwear > Sandals > Keen Taos > Rami Benhameda > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson