BackpackGearTest
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Footwear > Trail Shoes > Dunham Alcatraz > Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd > Long Term Report

Dunham Alcatraz
Long Term Report
January 10, 2005

Contents:
     Tester Information
     Product Information
     Report

Tester Information

Name: Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd

Location: Los Altos, CA

Age/Sex: 28/Female

Height: 5'5" (1.65 m)

Weight: 125 lb (57 kg)

Email: rebecca@backpackgeartest.org

Website: http://www.calipidder.com

I began backpacking in the summer of 2000 after moving to California. Although I started off carrying everything but the kitchen sink, my style has shifted to lightweight gear and techniques, though I am known to carry a few luxury items (mmm...pillow). First in my heart is summer backpacking, but I also enjoy snowshoeing, skiing, and snowcamping, as well as long dayhikes and peak climbing. I spend time outside during weekends year-round in the deserts and mountains of California. My weekend hikes are often 'spur-of-the-moment', and usually occur in and around Yosemite National Park, Desolation Wilderness (near Lake Tahoe), and Sonora Pass in the Sierra Nevada mountains, as well as Lassen National Park and Mt. Shasta area in the Southern Cascades.

Product Information

Name: Alcatraz

Manufacturer: Dunham

Manufacturer website: www.dunhambootmakers.com

Year of Manufacture: 2005

Listed Weight: None Listed 

Measured weight:  23 oz. (652 g) for the pair

Size: Women's 9.5B

MSRP: None listed

Worn out shoes

Long Term Report

The Dunham Alcatraz shoes are a lightweight trail shoe designed to be optimally used in wet conditions.  For details about the design of the shoe and its fit, see my Initial Report.  For details of my early experiences, see my Field Report.

During the Long Term Testing period I have put at least 150 additional miles (242 km) of measured distance on the Waffle Stomper Alcatraz shoes, on top of the 130 miles (209 km) during the Field Testing period .  Once again, the miles were split nearly evenly between running and hiking.  The running was both on-pavement and on-trail.  The hiking was both backpacking with a lightweight summer load and dayhiking with a small hydration pack.  In the rest of my report, I will refer to the total of 280 trail miles (451 km) put on these shoes, however, there are numerous 'around town' unmeasured miles put on these shoes as well. 

Shortly after the Field Report was posted I had my first bad experience with the Dunham Alcatraz shoes, which likely stemmed from the fact that the tread on the shoes (the Waffle pattern) has worn away significantly.  I was on a 20 mile (32 km) overnight hike in Hetch Hetchy, through varied terrain, much of it on smooth granite.  On hike in I observed a slippery segment of the trail, even mentioning 'watch out for the slick rock' to my hiking companions.  On the way out I was tired and at the exact same spot I slipped, skinning my knee and hands (and tragically crushing my bag of dried fruit - fortunately dried cherries taste just as good in the squished form as they do in their normal form).   I hiked slowly and cautiously for the remaining 5+ miles (8+ km), nervous (and still jittery from my fall) that each foot placement would send me tumbling into San Francisco's water supply.  Granted, the rock was slick, but it was also dry and not dust covered, and I would expect a good trail shoe to keep traction on such terrain.  I divide blame equally between my distracted state of mind and the shoes. 

The following weekend was an easy overnight hike, about seven miles round trip. Again the terrain varied from forest duff to granite and other volcanic rock.  We camped on granite outcropping and did a bit of scrambling around to gather firewood and explore the area.  The Alcatraz shoes were comfortable the whole time and gave me no troubles, though I was still being extra cautious on slippery granite due to the previous weekend's experience.

Approximately a month after the Field Report, and at about the 200 mile (322 km) mark on the shoes, I noticed the 'cushiness' fading rapidly.  Running in them became a little more uncomfortable as the padding was deteriorating.  I have continued to run and hike in them for another 50 miles (81 km) or so, but they have not been as comfortable as at the beginning, and I feel this the most after a run on paved trail.  The deteriorating padding is less noticeable on unpaved trail, although after an 11 mile (18 km) dayhike on soft redwood forest floor I was feeling the lack of cushioning and my feet were unexpectedly sore.

The last hike I took in the Alcatraz was a 6 mile (10 km) cross country hike in Death Valley, and perhaps the most difficult terrain I had put the shoe through.  In retrospect, it was not the best shoe to wear on this hike, but it gave me a good idea on the deterioration of the shoe after over 280 miles (451 km) of demanding use.  The photo below shows me hiking in the terrain - the rocks in this particular photo are all about grapefruit sized and very pointy.  Our destination was the gap to the right of the reddest rock in the photo, and the terrain was like this most of the way.

Death Valley WashOn the Death Valley hike we were looking for Red Wall canyon, which was about 2.5 miles (4 km) from the closest place to leave the car.  This left 2.5 miles (4 km) and 1000 ft (205 m) of vertical gain of hiking across the Death Valley floor.  It was a hike up the washes of an alluvial fan, and the terrain ranged from tiny gravel to microwave sized rocks, and the average rock size was about that of a cantalope, but much more jagged.  Running through this uneven terrain were hundreds of washes, cacti, and bushes.  It was a difficult hike and I felt the rocks through the shoe quite a bit.  The sharp midsized rocks that were impossible to avoid walking over poked my feet uncomfortably through the sole and the shoe provided little protection from them.  At the end of the hike (after exploring the canyon of course we had to walk back down the alluvial fan) my feet were extremely sore.  For the rest of my Death Valley hikes, which were even more difficult than this one, I switched to a more protective pair of leather boots. 

I expected to feel the rocks poke through the relatively thin and unprotected side of the lightweight shoe as my feet twisted and slid through the terrain, but I was surprised at how much I could feel through the sole, which had up until then been sturdy and protective of my feet when on rough terrain. 

Overall I have no complaints about the actual fit or comfort of the shoe.  When the shoe was new and had fewer miles on them they performed quite well and my feet were happy.  The problems I had were only after I put a number of miles on them.  I wish that I got more mileage out of them, but I have been really rough on them and can't really complain.

So, after six months and over 300 total miles (483 km) I have reached a pretty strong opinion about these shoes.  With the extremely demanding hikes and terrain I have put them through, the Alcatraz performed very well for about the first 200 miles (322 km).  After the 200 mile (322 km) mark the padding of the sole, the Waffle Stomper tread, and stitching all began to deteriorate quickly.  I will not be wearing these shoes for hiking or running anymore, but this is simply because I've worn them out.  If I hadn't liked them to begin with, I never would have put these many miles on them!   

 



Read more reviews of Dunham gear
Read more gear reviews by Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd

Reviews > Footwear > Trail Shoes > Dunham Alcatraz > Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd > Long Term Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson