| |
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
|
|
Brunton Liberty Manteless Lantern
Long Term Report
|
|
Name: |
Cora Shea |
|
Background:
I began backpacking in 1997. I love backpacking in spring
and winter snow more than anything, especially on skis. My pack
weight ranges from 15 to 90 lb (7 to 40 kg), and I vary sleeping in a
tarp, tent, quinzhee, snowcave, bolt-hole, bivy, people-pile, or
straight under the stars. I spend a lot of my time outdoors, and I
prioritize gear durability and functionality above weight.
|
|
Age: |
25 |
|
Gender: |
Female |
|
Height: |
5 ft 9 in (1.75 m) |
|
Weight: |
150 lb (70 kg) |
|
Email address: |
cahhmc at yahoo dot com |
|
Location: |
Los Angeles, California, USA |
|
Date: |
October 1, 2005 |
|
Basic Product Information
|
|
Manufacturer: Brunton, ($115 US)
|
Year of Manufacture: 2005
|
Product: Liberty Mantleless Lantern
|
|
Listed weight: 8.3 oz (235 g)
|
Weight as delivered:
7.2 oz (204 g) Main body, 2.0 oz (57 g) Empty fabric case
|
| |
|
The Liberty is a lantern which burns canister-type isobutane/propane mix fuel
and uses a platinum element rather than a mantle to create light. It accepts
standard Lindal-valve canisters, has a piezo igniter, and creates directed
light using two side reflector wings.
This report covers long term use from May to September, 2005. For more product information and items that can be reported on without field use, please see my Initial Report. For more information on actual use in the field, please see my Field Report.
|
|
After my field report, I was fairly frustrated with the Liberty. It served as
a lantern, sure, and a very convenient mantleless one at that, but it just
didn't fit my needs in winter and early spring. The snow provided only a
mediocre platform for the isobutane canisters (and melted out with the heat
from the lantern, causing the lantern to tip over) and the lantern couldn't
hang. Additionally, the light was surprisingly dim, orange, and difficult to
direct downward for things like cooking just below it.
And here, at the end of the test, my opinions are equally mixed. I found
myself bringing the lantern out only for testing, and not particularly because
I wanted to use it. I think the main reason was that it took a long time for
me to learn how to pick a good resting spot for the lantern to sit on. After
years of experience, I'm fairly adept at picking out a spot for my stove to
rest, and even at picking out a spot for my other lantern to hang (such as a
ski pole, or in a tent) but situating the (very light-directed) Liberty so I
could use its orange light simply baffled me.
I used it on a total of four non-snow trips which gave me a different
perspective on the trips discussed in my Field Report and similar snow trips
afterwards. In some ways, the trips were much better. The isobutane, as I
predicted, probably suffered from some degradation in performance due to the
cold. As a result, the Liberty was noticeably brighter in the summer, though
no less orange. Also in the summer, the lantern did not have a tendency to tip
over as the heat melted through any snow platform. However, I found myself
spending even more time looking for a suitable spot - in the summer I could not
pile up snow to make a stand and had to find adequately sized and level rocks
for the purpose.
Additionally, I did not even try to take the Liberty into any tent shelter
because of the heat. What a hot lantern! Thus, my use for the Liberty was
limited to cooking dinner and socializing, which is (all things considered) a
good and rewarding use. And most summer trips - once the Liberty was all set
up properly and commenced throwing a nice orange glow over the camp, I almost
forgot about the spot-finding time and my inability to read well or pick dirt
out of dinner in the orange light. Almost.
One thing that can very much be said in the Liberty's defense is its durability
and thus its ease of use. I have always treated my lanterns as the most
fragile items in my pack, and for good reason - the mantles don't work upon
arrival otherwise. Over the course of testing the Liberty, however, I moved
from carefully situating it inside its case in my pack, to simply wrapping it
in a sock (sans case) and chucking it wherever it fit. Then, the ability to
simply remove the Liberty from my pack, screw it on to a spare fuel bottle,
light it, and enjoy it was certainly a treat throughout the test.
In short, herein lies the question - does the ease of use in packing and mantle
handling outweigh the difficulty of situating the lantern and its mediocre
glow? For me, I think the answer is no. If I am going to lug a lantern, I
would rather whip it out at camp, hang it wherever, and have the camp flooded
with light (and then pay the price of careful handling and packing). However,
one should keep in mind that this is sheer personal preference. I dislike
sounding frustrated with the Liberty simply because of my personal expectations
of a lantern, especially since it is such a cool technological creation.
|
|
Long Term Care and Maintenance:
Over the long run, the lantern continues to function well. It (as I stated in
my Field Report) developed rust and corrosion very early on in the test.
However, as the dry summer enveloped the Sierra (and also perhaps as I started
carrying it outside of its rather water-trapping case) it suffered no further
degradation.
Also, the corrosion never affected it functionally - only aesthetically. Other
than trying to remove the corrosion (a rather futile endeavor, other than
straight filing which I found also removed some of the metal and thus I ceased)
I felt no need to perform any sort of care or maintenance at all.
After the corrosion, I was much more careful about not getting the lantern wet
for extended periods of time. This is what eventually led me to carrying the
Liberty outside of its case - I came home after one trip, opened the case, and
found that little rivulets of water had hitchhiked their way home in the
waterproof case. So in a way, I felt I was caring for the Liberty by carrying
it in a sock rather than the included case, and as the corrosion ceased
building perhaps it was a good idea.
Long Term Durability:
The lantern proved to be quite durable. As mentioned above, I forewent the
case and nothing resulted but my losing the weight of the case from my pack.
The largest problem I had with the durability is that my finger would sometimes
slip when prying the wings apart or unhinging the gas adjustment, and would
bump the platinum element. The element is (only slightly) less then
hemispherical in places now, but continues to function fine.
Also, the piezo igniter tended to shift more quickly when I did not hike with
the Liberty in its case. This was no problem - twenty seconds of adjustment of
my thumb was always enough to re-find the correct spacing for the piezo
extension - but hopefully it is a rather durable extended wire and will put up
with my thumb adjustments for many years to come.
Overall, the durability of the Liberty was my most favorite point. The sheer
ability to pack up the lantern, throw it in a sock, throw the sock in my pack
wherever it fits, and take it out and light it up was amazingly nice.
|
|
Overall, the Brunton Liberty has a lot of tradeoffs for its advantage of being
a mantleless lantern. Its light is very orange (and thus difficult to do
eye-straining tasks such as reading) and its heat output is very high.
However, it is quite small and easy to use, and I've found I can just throw it
in my pack without its case and it takes up almost no room and does fine.
|
Likes
|
Dislikes
|
|
Small and compact
|
Gets hot!
|
|
Durable enough to throw in my pack w/o case
|
Rust and corrosion formed early on
|
|
Easy to use and light
|
Light is very orange and hard to see by
|
|
Read more reviews of Brunton gear
Read more gear reviews by Cora Hussey
|