BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Packs > Frameless Backpacks and Day Packs > Six Moon Designs Starlite > Karen Ross > Field Report

SIX MOON DESIGNS STARLITE PACK - FIELD REPORT

Background Information:

Name:  Karen Ross
Age:  24          
Gender: Female
Height:  5'0" (1.5 m)
Weight: 103 lb  (47 kg)         
Email address: karen ross AT tufts DOT edu
City, State, Country: Metropolitan Boston area, MA
Date:  May 19, 2004

Backpacking Background
I have been hiking and camping for as long as I can remember.  I'm an avid runner and day hiker, ski occasionally, kayak, car camp, and generally like to spend as much time outdoors as possible.  I've spent time hiking and orienteering with scout groups, as well as while doing my military service in Israel.  I travel frequently and try to use every opportunity to explore. I started backpacking a few years ago and my trips have been mostly limited so far to shorter ones, although I’m slowly working my way up to longer trips (including trail maintenance work).  Being small, I tend toward lightweight gear, although I’m not one to hit the digital scales with every item – it’s more of a philosophy than a science for me.  I like to think of my style as light, but not without a couple luxuries.


Product Description

Manufacturer: Six Moon Designs.
Manufacturer website: www.sixmoondesigns.com
Year of manufacture: 2004
Configuration: 420 Dernier Pack Cloth, padded hip belt
Listed weight (without stays): 27 oz (765 g)
Received weight (without stays): 24.8 oz (703 g)
Listed weight  (with stays): 32 oz (907 g)
Measured weight (with stays):  28.8 oz (816 g)
Capacity: 4100 c.i. (67 L),  2600 c.i. (42.6 L) in the main bag
Size: Adjustable torso length from 18 to 24 in (46 to 61 cm)
Color: Dark Green
MSRP (based on configuration): $145.00


Selected Features (from the website):

  • Zippered Pad Case on the back of the pack allows your sleeping pad to work for you both day and night. The zipper allows quick access to remove the pad for use during breaks without unpacking your pack. The case is sized to accommodate a variety of pads, including: Z Rest or Therm-a-Rest
  • Advanced Suspension System keeps your sleeping pad rigid, thus allowing it to transfer weight off your shoulders and onto your hips.
  • Three exterior mesh pockets for quick access to gear.
  • Contoured Cut of pack conforms to the shape of your back providing a more comfortable carry.
  • Choice of fabrics gives you the option of selecting the right combination of weight, strength and cost to fit your needs. High strength 1/8” Spectra Gridstop provides the greatest strength to weight ration of any pack cloth used today. Also available is a 420 Denier pack cloth to provide a cost effective pack.
  • Removable Harness allows complete flexibility in configuring the pack to suit your needs. When traveling on planes, buses or trains, simply remove the harness altogether. This keeps your straps from getting hung up.
  • Two Stay pockets allow easy upgrade of pack to a full internal frame pack with the addition of two 24"(61 cm) stays.

Additional Product Information:

I received the Starlite Pack in 420 Dernier pack cloth and with a padded hip belt.  The pack is a handsome dark green, not too conspicuous (in my opinion), but easy enough for my young eyes to spot in the dusk.  The three mesh pockets are huge, and in addition to the storage space they provide, the pack is equipped with a bungee cord (placed strategically over the front mesh pocket) which allows the user to cinch the pack down and reduce pack volume considerably.  The Starlite is also equipped with an extension collar which can be filled to capacity or folded down in order to close the pack.  For a full description of the pack, see my Initial Report.

Field Testing:

Testing Conditions:
Over the past two months, the Starlite has functioned primarily as a day pack.  Due to the extended winter, I've done less hiking than I would like to; nevertheless, I've been able to get out and about a number of times since receiving the Starlite.  Most of the hikes took place near my home, with elevations under 1500 feet (457 meters) and in temperatures ranging from 30-70 F (-1 - 21 C).  When day hiking, I used the Starlite without the aluminum stays. 

The Starlite also accompanied me on a 3-day backpacking trip in the Palisades Park System in New York.  Temperatures on just that trip ranged from 30 to 70 F (-1 to 21 C), and elevation gains ran up to 3500 feet (1067 meters).  On this trip the pack was full, and I inserted the aluminum stays for the duration of the hike. 

Finally, I've been using the Starlite to carry laundry to and from the laundromat around the corner.  This has been done both with and without the aluminum stays inserted; mostly I've been doing this to get a sense of how the pack feels loaded up or, alternately, only half full.  I've done several loads of laundry since the Starlite arrived, and the poor pack has had more than its share of dirty hiking clothes stuffed inside it.

Testing observations:
I used the Starlite on several day hikes near my home in Boston and while visiting family in New York.  On all trips, the pack was packed with the bare minimum needed for a day hike: extra layers, food, a first aid kit, water, etc. Because I tend to carry very little on day hikes, I found that the Starlite was overkill for these trips.  Even used without the aluminum stays and with the compression straps cinched down, there was slightly too much room in the Starlite.  Thus, my gear bounced around quite a bit.  On the other hand, the lightness of the pack and my ability to cinch it down further with the bungee cord meant that it was very comfortable to wear.  I don’t think I will continue to use the Starlite for day hiking, however – it is simply too large a pack for my day hiking needs.

On the backpacking trip, however, the Starlite was full.  My sleeping bag was placed at the bottom of the pack.  Above it (in order) were my clothing stuff sack, kitchen/bear bag, tent body and fly, and a small stuff sack containing first aid supplies and assorted small items.  I was using a Platypus 1L (34 oz.) water bladder as well as a Nalgene 1L (34 oz.) water bottle; the Platypus was placed inside the Starlite with the hose coming through the hydration opening in the pack.  My Nalgene as well as maps and guide book were placed in the left pocket of the Starlite.  In the right-hand pocket I placed my fuel bottle and snacks for the day.  A fleece and rain jacket were placed in the middle pocket.  I was using a Thermarest Ultralite 3/4 sleeping pad, which I deflated, folded into quarters, and placed in the pad compartment.  I then zipped the pad case shut, leaving a small opening for the nozzle of the pad.  After loading the rest of my pack, I opened the nozzle of the sleeping pad to allow for it to inflate a bit (thus providing more back padding), then closed the nozzle and zipped the pad case shut entirely.  

I would estimate that I was using approximately 3 inches (7.6 cm) of the Starlite’s extension collar.  Once the pack was full, I purged excess air from the remainder of the extension collar, pinched shut the hook and loop closure, folded the excess extension collar material over and clipped shut the buckle.  This way the pack had no extra room, allowing for a sturdier carry.

Sure enough, carrying the Starlite – even as full as it was – was a breeze.  I had attempted to make sure anything I might need during the day was stashed in one of the exterior pockets rather than inside the pack: although it was a bit difficult to reach into the pockets for snacks, maps, etc., I found this infinitely preferable to stopping, removing the pack, opening it and digging around for whatever item was necessary every time I wanted a bite to eat or needed to check my location. 

The one problem I had with the pack while wearing it on this trip was using the hydration bladder.  The port on the pack has a rather small diameter, thus the clip provided with the hydration bladder did not fit through the port and ended up on the inside of the pack.  As a result, the hydration tube kept slipping further and further out of the pack, so that several miles into my hike each day a long, snake-like tube would be extending out of the Starlite.  This wasn’t problematic as far as drinking from the hydration bladder was concerned.  However,  it was inconvenient in terms of having to push the tube back into the pack periodically.  Next time I will try to find a way to place the clip on the outside of the hydration port so that I can clip the tube to the pack and prevent it from sliding out. 

The Starlite proved fairly comfortable on this 3-day trip.  I’m not quite sure how much it weighed; although the pack was full, most of my gear is fairly lightweight, and I was sharing several items with my hiking partner, which kept the weight down.  In any case, the Starlite sat comfortably on my back at first.  The hip belt was cinched tight and I wore the sternum strap as well.  Nonetheless, after a while my shoulders began to hurt, as though the weight was not being transferred properly to my hips.  I wonder if my torso really might be a bit too short for this pack: despite doing everything possible to make it fit, including adjusting the load lifter straps periodically, by the end of the day my shoulders really hurt.  This is a problem I’ve had with other packs as well, which makes me wonder if it is the pack that’s the problem or possibly just how I wear it. 

Other than the shoulder issue, however, I was very comfortable wearing the pack for the duration of this three-day trip.  The hip belt sat comfortably, and the DriGlide material on the sleeping pad case (as well as the gorgeous weather) ensured that my back stayed nice and dry.  I also discovered that the Starlite is really well suited to someone my size – previously I was using a significantly larger pack which extended up to and occasionally over my head when full.  The Starlite is large enough to accommodate my packing needs.  However, it is short enough that I can easily move my head back and forth while wearing it (even when using part of the extension collar). 

Although I was comfortable, I’m not sure about the durability of the pack itself.  Upon inspection at the end of the hike, I found that the seams at the point where the shoulder straps attach to the pack looked a little loose.  The straps are still securely attached, but the stitches look as though they are beginning to come out.  This is a bit disturbing: after all, other than a few day hikes and laundry trips, this backpacking trip was the first true test of the Starlite.  

Continued Testing:
I will be leaving for South Africa shortly to spend the summer working there, and the Starlite will be coming with me.  I intend to use it as luggage on the trip over as well as my main pack while traveling and hiking in South Africa (which I intend to do as much as possible of).  The trip will allow me to test the Starlite’s performance as airline luggage when the harness is removed.  Furthermore, I will be closely inspecting the shoulder straps to see how they hold up over the next six months of testing. 

 

 



Read more reviews of Six Moon Designs gear
Read more gear reviews by Karen Ross

Reviews > Packs > Frameless Backpacks and Day Packs > Six Moon Designs Starlite > Karen Ross > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson