| |
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
|

Field Report - Six Moon Designs Starlite Ultralight Backpack
| Personal Biographical Info: |
| Name: |
Todd Martin |
| Age: |
40 |
| Gender: |
Male |
| Height: |
5'11" (1.8 m) |
| Weight: |
155 lbs. (68 kg) |
| Email Address: |
todds_hiking_guide (at) yahoo (dot) com |
| Location: |
Phoenix, AZ USA |
| Date: |
May 14, 2004 |
| Background: |
Thru-hiked the Appalachian Trail in 1994. Moved to Pacific Northwest 1996
and enjoyed day hiking excursions in the Columbia River Gorge area, followed
by some backpacking along the Pacific Crest Trail. Moved to the desert
southwest in 1997 and have been actively day hiking most weekends. I generally
take 2 weeklong trips to the Grand Canyon each year. Backpacking philosophy
has been rapidly moving towards ultra-light gear. My current base pack
weight (not including food or water) measures about 10 lbs (4.5 kg). Have
also been participating in canyoneering since 1997. Web master for Todd's
Desert Hiking Guide at:
http://www.toddshikingguide.com/ |
| Product Information: |
| Manufacturer: |
Six Moon Designs (http://www.sixmoondesigns.com/) |
| Style of Product: |
Ultralight Backpack |
| Color: |
Dark green and black |
| Year of Manufacture: |
2004 |
| Listed Weight: |
27 oz (765 grams) |
| Weight as Delivered: |
29.7 oz (842 g) with aluminum stays
25.0 oz (708 g) without aluminum stays |
| Listed Size: |
Main Bag = 2600 inches^3 (42600 cm^3)
Extension Collar = 450 inches^3 (7400 cm^3)
Pad Pocket = 450 inches^3 (7400 cm^3)
Left Mesh Pocket = 200 inches^3 (3300 cm^3)
Right Mesh Pocket = 120 inches^3 (2000 cm^3)
Front Mesh Pocket = 280 inches^3 (4600 cm^3)
Total = 4100 inches^3 (67000 cm^3) |
| Materials: |
420 Denier Pack Cloth |
| Field and Test Information: |
|
Location(s) of test:
|
The Starlite was taken on two backpacking trips,
a five-day trip through Kanab Creek in the Grand Canyon in northern Arizona and a
three-day trip in Aravaipa Canyon in central Arizona.
|
|
Terrain:
|
Both trips consisted of off trail hiking through canyons
with running water. In the Grand Canyon, the footing ranged from good trail to
rocky stream beds covered with stones which ranged from pea gravel to
boulders, and included wading and multiple stream crossings. Aravaipa is a
level canyon in which the stream bed is the main route of travel. Travel
consisted of a considerable amount of wading along with short stretches of use
trail. Elevations ranged from 4000 to 7000 feet (1200 to 2100 meters)
above sea level. |
|
Weather Conditions:
|
Weather conditions were sunny and warm with day time
temperatures in the 100's F (38 C) and night time temperatures in the mid 50's
F (10 C). A few sprinkles were encountered in the Grand Canyon, but no
significant downpours. |
| Description of Experience and Comments on Product Performance: |
| |
| Kanab Creek - Grand Canyon, AZ |
| The Starlite was carried on a 5 day out and
back trip through Kanab
Creek in the Grand Canyon. |
| Pack
Configuration & Trip Details: |
| |
Suspension: |
Aluminum stays |
| |
Sleeping Pad: |
Therm-a-Rest Ultralight 3/4 length |
| |
Total Start Weight: |
25 lbs (11.3 kg) |
| |
Total Mileage: |
45 miles (72.5 km) |
The
goal of the hike was to travel down the length of Kanab Creek from Sowats
Point to the Colorado River and explore up several of the side canyons along
the way. With the pack loaded with 5 days of food plus the inclusion of some additional gear
used to enable exploration of wet areas in the canyon (such as a shorty wet suit and dry bags), I anticipated that my pack weight would be
somewhat heavier than I'm used to carrying on a typical backpacking trip. I
also opted for a Therm-a-Rest air mattress over my standard 3/4 length
closed cell foam pad since camp sites in the canyon are often somewhat rocky
and I find the air mattress more comfortable in those conditions. To
accommodate this weight, I decided to use the optional aluminum stays that
are available with
the pack as the suspension system, rather than rely on the sleeping pad. The
pack was loaded with my sleeping bag on the bottom followed by (in order,
from bottom to top), my tarp, clothes, wet suit, and food. My water bladder
was placed against the back pad of the pack with the above items packed
around it. The external mesh pockets were used to carry frequently used
items including a GPS, maps, permit, water filter, toiletries, and sundries
(batteries, knife, duct tape etc.). The Therm-a-Rest was deflated and folded
in half twice, then placed in the pad pocket. The pocket was then zipped
most of the way closed, except for the corner which allowed access to the
mattress nozzle. The nozzle was then opened to allow the air mattress to
expand and fill the pocket, before closing the nozzle and zipping
the pad closed. The mattress
in this configuration provided a comfortable cushion against my back and a
barrier from some of the harder items that could potentially poke me in the
back while hiking. All of the items carried on the trip fit inside the pack with room to spare.
I estimate that I used about 3 inches (8 cm) of the 10.5 inches (27 cm)
available in the extension collar. The roll top was then closed and the
strap across the top of the pack cinched down to secure the load.With the
pack loaded, I set off on the hike and immediately found the pack to be well
balanced and comfortable to carry. With the hip belt firmly cinched around
my waist or just above my waist (which is 32 inches or 81 cm in
circumference),
there was only about 2 inches left in the strap, which confirms my suspicion
that hikers with a 29 inch
(74 cm) waist or smaller will have a hard time getting the waist strap of
the pack tight enough. The pack transferred the load of the contents
directly to my hips and the upper load lifters kept the top of the pack
sufficiently close to my body that the weight did not sit on top of, or pull
back on, my shoulders. All straps to adjust the pack (waist belt, shoulder
straps and load lifters) were easy to adjust, and I found that once I found
a comfortable fit, I rarely had to make adjustments to the straps while I
hiked. I did not use the chest strap at all.
The mesh pockets on the outside of the pack provided easy access to
commonly used items like: maps, camera, permit, water filter, spare
batteries and snacks. The right hand mesh pocket is considerably shorter than
the other two which enabled me to grab items out of it without removing the pack. I
did find that I had to contort a bit to get my hand high enough to reach
into the pocket, but with a little practice this motion became second
nature. I like to take a lot of photos as I hike, so I kept my camera in
this pocket and found having quick access to it to be extremely convenient
(as opposed to dropping the pack and rummaging around inside every time I
want to take a photo). I did find that the side pockets, which contain
pleats, hang somewhat loosely on the sides of the pack. This causes
everything placed in the pockets to fall to the bottom and form a large
bulge. While not inherently annoying, the bulging mesh made it a bit more
difficult to dig out items and also created the opportunity for trees and
plants to snag the mesh when bushwhacking. The mesh pocket on the back of
the pack, on the other hand, is criss-crossed with an elastic strap which
held items in the pocket securely.
The pack features a hydration port in the upper right corner of the pack,
just below this extension collar, through which you can feed a drinking
tube. I found that the port is a little small and I had to remove the clip
to the drinking tube and fiddle with the tube a bit to get it to feed
through the hole, a minor inconvenience. I was a bit more disappointed
though to discover that the pack lacked a water bladder pocket. Hiking in
desert areas, water is typically the single heaviest item in my pack. All
packs carry best with the heaviest items located in the upper part of the
pack, as close to the body as possible. Since a water bladder is flexible,
it is difficult to get it to stay in one place without such a pocket since
it tends to slosh around and work its way down into the pack, particularly
as you drink and it becomes more flexible. I think the reason the
manufacturer did not include a water bladder pocket is that the back pad of
the pack (where the pocket is usually located) is complicated by the
stitching required for the integrated pad pocket. Without a bladder pocket I
placed my water bladder in the location where I wanted it to sit in the pack
and placed other items around it to hold it in place. This technique was
reasonably successful.
Overall I was very pleased with the way the pack performed on the trip
and found it to be comfortable and easy to pack and carry.
|
|
|
| Aravaipa Canyon - AZ |
| The Starlite was carried on a 2 day out and
back trip through Aravaipa Canyon in central Arizona. Several side canyons
were explored along the way. |
| Pack
Configuration & Trip Details: |
| Suspension: |
No aluminum stays |
| Sleeping Pad: |
Z-Rest 3/4 length |
| Total Start Weight: |
19 lbs (8.6 kg) |
| Total Mileage: |
22 miles (35.5 km) not including side trips |
The
goal
of the hike was to travel down the length of Aravaipa Canyon to check out
the numerous side canyons that drain into the stream bed. Three days worth
of food were carried and a 3/4 length Z-Rest was used as the only form of
suspension in the pack (the aluminum stays were removed).Without the
extra gear required for the Grand Canyon trip and only three days of food, I
found that I didn't have enough equipment to load the pack fully. As a
result, the extension collar was not used at all (as can be seen in the
photo at left). The first thing I noticed about the pack in this
configuration is that it pulled back on my shoulders slightly and was
somewhat less comfortable than on my previous trip despite the fact that I
was carrying less weight. I attribute this to the fact that the load lifters
are attached right at the top of the pack where the aluminum stays end and 4
inches (10 cm) above the point where the pad pocket ends. Without the
aluminum stays, and without enough gear in the pack to provide support in
this upper region of the pack, the material to which the load lifters were
attached did not have enough support to provide the needed tension to lift
the weight. The result was that the pack pulled back slightly on my
shoulders, though this wasn't terribly uncomfortable since my overall pack
weight was so light. For future hikes I will be sure to use the aluminum
stays for trips where I am not carrying enough gear to fill the pack
sufficiently to provide support where the load lifters connect (in fact,
since the stays only add 4.7 oz or 134 g, I'll probably use the pack with
the stays in at all times).
The 3/4 length Z-Rest that I used as a back pad provided comfortable
padding against my back and fit perfectly inside the pad pocket. With day
time highs above 100 F (38 C) I found that the DriGlide material that the
pad pocket is made from absorbed sweat, and dried quickly when the pack was
removed for any extended period of time. Though the material was damp
against my back as I hiked, it was considerably more comfortable than it
would have been had I had the waterproof fabric of the Z-Rest mattress
directly against my back (as is the case with the GVP G4 pack that I own).
The top of the pack is secured in the following manner. First, the mouth
of the pack, which is lined with hook and loop fastener, is closed. Then the
extension collar is rolled like a dry bag and the ends clipped together
using a side-release buckle. A cinch strap is then brought across the top of
the pack and secured with another side-release buckle. Seems a bit
excessive, but between the three means of securing the mouth of the pack,
I'll bet nothing accidentally jumps out of the top. The only real complaint
I have with the closure is that the side-release buckle which secures the
roll top closure only clips together when oriented in a particular
direction. Fifty percent of the time after rolling the top, I push the
buckles together only to realize that they don't clip together and have to
flip one side or the other. While not a major inconvenience, this problem
could easily be fixed by the manufacturer through a change in selection of
hardware. |
| |
| Summary: |
| My experience with the Six Moon Designs Starlite Ultralight Backpack has
been extremely positive to date. The pack appears to offer many of the advantages
of a backpack with full suspension in a lightweight package. The pack has
plenty of volume and is very comfortable to carry and does a great job
transferring the load of the pack to the hikers hips. I can tell already
that the pack had become my pack of choice for lightweight backpacking
trips. |
| |
| Likes:
|
- Light weight
- Comfortable to carry
- Suspension transfers the load of the pack to the hikers hips
- External mesh pockets allow easy access to frequently used items
|
| Areas for Improvement: |
- I'd like to have a dedicated water bladder pocket which keeps the
contents of the bladder close to the hikers back
- Mesh side pockets are a bit too loose, all items fall to the bottom of the
pocket in a heap
- The roll top closure system should have an omni-directional side
release buckle
|
| General Comment: |
- You have to be a bit of a contortionist to be able to reach into the
right side mesh side pocket
|
|
Long Term Test Plan:
Over the next 4 months, I plan to conduct additional tests on the Starlite. I have
several backpacking and camping trips planned in Arizona and Utah and plan to
use the Starlite exclusively during this time. I am hoping to further test:
comfort in the heat of the AZ summer, rain and wind resistance during the
summer monsoons and the durability over the longer term.
I'd like to thank BackpackGearTest and Six Moon Designs for allowing me
to participate in this test. |
Read more reviews of Six Moon Designs gear
Read more gear reviews by Todd L. Martin
|