BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Packs > Frameless Backpacks and Day Packs > Ultimate Direction SpeeDemon > Todd Martin > Field Report

Field Report: Ultimate Direction - SpeeDemon Pack

Personal Biographical Info:
 
Name: Todd Martin

Logo

Age: 41
Gender: Male
Height: 5'11" (1.8 m)
Weight: 155 lbs. (68 kg)
Waist: 31" (79 cm)
Torso Length: 18.5" (47 cm)
Email Address: todds_hiking_guide (at) yahoo (dot) com
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Date: April 11, 2005
Background: Thru-hiked the Appalachian Trail in 1994. Moved to Pacific Northwest 1996 and enjoyed day hiking excursions in the Columbia River Gorge area, followed by some backpacking along the Pacific Crest Trail. Moved to the desert southwest in 1997 and have been actively day hiking most weekends. I generally take 2 weeklong trips to the Grand Canyon each year. Backpacking philosophy has been rapidly moving towards ultra-light gear. My current base pack weight (not including food or water) measures about 10 lbs (4.5 kg). Have also been participating in canyoneering since 1997. Web master for Todd's Desert Hiking Guide at: http://www.toddshikingguide.com/

 

Product Information:
 

Manufacturer:

Ultimate Direction (http://www.ultimatedirection.com/)

Style of Product:

Lightweight backpack

Color:

Red and gray

Year of Manufacture:

2005

List Price: Not listed on the Manufacturer's Website

Listed Weight:

39 oz (1.1 kg)

Weight as Delivered:

Pack - 30 oz  (0.85 kg)
Water Reservoir and Tube - 7 oz (0.2 kg)
Total Weight - 37 oz (1 kg)

Capacity: Storage Capacity: 2300 cu. in. (37.7 L)
Fluid Capacity: 96 oz. (2.8 L )
Material: 70D Nylon baby rip stop with hypalon coating, 210D Nylon, 3D AirMesh

 

Field and Test Information:
 

Location(s) of test:

The pack was tested in the mountains and deserts of Arizona including the Superstition Wilderness, Sierra Estrella Mountains, Tonto National Forest and Phoenix Mountain Preserve system.

Terrain:

Trips consisted of both on and off trail hikes, during which time the pack was subjected to some bushwhacking and brush.

Weather Conditions:

Mostly sunny and cool, with occasional light sprinkles.

 

Description of Experience and Comments on Product Performance:
 
The SpeeDemon pack was carried on roughly a dozen day hikes in the deserts of Arizona ranging in distance from 8-20 miles (13-32 km). During these hikes I typically carried between 7-15 pack1pounds (3-7 kg) of gear including food, water, wind shell, rain suit, long sleeve shirt, camera, and small zip-lock bag of miscellaneous items (spare batteries, map, compass, small knife etc.). There is not much of a system to my packing style on these hikes. Usually I'll just put a full water reservoir in the pouch designed for that purpose, stuff the rain suit in the bottom of the pack's main compartment, and pile everything else on top. The exceptions are my bag of miscellaneous items which I place in the top compartment, and my camera which I carry in one of the handy-dandy pouches located on the pack's hip belt. On one hike during the test period I carried a spare water bottle in the removable bottle holster located on the shoulder strap of the pack.

Suspension System and Comfort:
As described in my Initial Report, the shoulder harness of the SpeeDemon pack has a unique design by which the lift webbing of each of the two straps is continuous. The first effect of this design is that when picked up by the shoulder strap (the typical way I lift a day pack to carry it to the car or put it on my back) is that the side that is grabbed becomes very long due to the fact that it takes up all the slack from the shoulder strap on the other side. When slung over one shoulder in this fashion, the pack hangs very low and at an awkward angle. I do not find this to be a big deal, though it is sort of odd at first. The shoulder harness design also has the result that, when worn, the pack's shoulder straps rise and fall with the hiker's shoulders as they walk. This feels a bit unusual when the pack is first worn, but is actually quite comfortable and it ensures that the pack weight is equally distributed on each shoulder.

Also noted in my Initial Report, the SpeeDemon does not have a rigid suspension system. Instead it has a flexible framepack4 consisting of two pieces of semi-rigid 'S' shaped foam sewn into either side of the pack. The foam gives the pack some shape and support while still remaining lightweight. But how does it do in supporting the weight of the contents of the pack and keeping the load from being transferred to the hiker's shoulders? Well, the answer depends on how the pack is stuffed. Like some other light weight packs I've seen, the SpeeDemon relies on the contents of the pack to provide some of the rigidity required to give the pack its shape. My experience is that the foam stays are not strong enough to do the job on their own. As a result, if the pack is not filled to capacity, the gear forms a bunch at the bottom of the main storage compartment and does not contribute to the pack's shape. In this case, I have found that the pack slumps (as can be seen in the photo at right) and a portion of the pack's weight is transferred to the hiker's shoulders, pulling back and down on them in an uncomfortable fashion. On the other hand, if pack is filled, the added rigidity provided by gear keeps the pack upright and a larger proportion of the weight is carried by the hip belt. This was confirmed during testing when, with the pack on my back, I simply unclipped the hip belt. I could feel the weight drop onto my shoulders when this was done, leading me to conclude that much of the weight was indeed being carried on my hips.

The fit of the pack is adjusted to the user by what the manufacturer calls its "Torso Link Suspension System". The system allows the upper back pad and shoulder strap assembly to be raised or lowered relative to the pack using hook and loop fastener strips located behind the back pad and within the pack body. To date, my experience with this system has been mixed. With the suspension set in it's lowest position (configured for a shorter torso), the connection point for the shoulder straps and the pack's load lifters both sit below the top of my shoulders. In order for these items to perform effectively, they should sit higher than the shoulders, optimally at a 45 degree angle. I have tried raising the suspension in the field in order to better achieve this setting, but have pack5found that it produces an uncomfortable fit and that the higher setting causes the pack to hang back from my shoulders. This seems to be the result of two design decisions:
1. The connection point for the load lifters are hard sewn to the body of the pack instead of to the upper suspension system. As a result, when the suspension system is raised, it changes the angle of the load lifter webbing. When the suspension is set in a longer position, the load lifter webbing actually comes completely off of the shoulder straps and passes directly over the hiker's shoulders at an awkward angle. When tightened in this position, instead of pulling the pack weight up and off the hiker's shoulders, it simply causes the shoulder straps to buckle and fold (see photo at left).
2. Because the foam frame ends just below the pack's load lifters, when the suspension is raised, there is no support that extends up to the top of the pack's shoulder straps. Without any support, the pack slumps and pulls back from the hiker's back, resulting in increased weight pulling down and back on the shoulder straps.
Since I have only tried a few quick adjustments in the field in an attempt to achieve a better fit, I am going to reserve my final judgment of the adjustable suspension system until my final report when I've had more time to experiment and fine tune the fit. To date, I have found that the shortest torso setting provides the best comfort for me.

In addition to the suspension system described, the pack has an adjustable sternum strap which can be raised or lowered along a continuous 6 inch (15 cm) piece of webbing located on the shoulder straps. Typically I do not use a sternum strap, particularly when carrying a day pack, but I've found that the shoulder straps of the SpeeDemon tend to ride rather wide. My experience is that the use of the sternum strap helps to pull the shoulder straps together, providing a more comfortable fit. 

Finally, in my discussion of comfort, I'd like to mention the pack's 3D AirMesh back panel and shoulder straps. So far, I've found the straps to be soft and comfortable, and that they've done a good job controlling moisture build up. The real test, though, will occur in the next few months as we move into the summer months and temperatures Arizona rise to well over 100 F (38 C).

Gear Storage:
Gear storage options on the SpeeDemon are in no short supply. Thepack2 main compartment and top mounted storage pocket are secured with waterproof zippers. The zippers work fine, but are much stiffer to open and close than regular zippers due to a rubberized storm flap that covers the teeth. The zipper on the main compartment extends 3/5 of the way down the body of the pack, making it easy to stuff items into the wide mouth. The inside of the main compartment is separated by a water reservoir pouch which holds the reservoir next to the pack's back pad. This pouch is made of nylon (like the rest of the pack body) and is not elasticized in any way. Without elastic, and because it is cut rather wide, I find that it does not hold the reservoir securely. As a result, the water reservoir sort of slumps in the pocket holding the mouth of the reservoir pocket open, making it somewhat difficult to get other gear into the main compartment without unintentionally putting it on top of the reservoir instead of into the main body of the pack.

Though small, my favorite storage compartments on the pack are the two removable hip belt mounted pouches. They are the perfect size for a snack or a small point and shoot camera and offer convenient and easy access to frequently used items (I like to take a lot of photos, so I find easy access to a camera is a very useful feature). Other packs I've used place a storage pocket on the side of the pack, which I invariably find I can only access by contorting my arm at an awkward angle. This is not the case with the hip pouches on the SpeeDemon. My only suggestion for these pockets would be to utilize the same waterproof zippers and material in their construction as in the main pack body. I believe this would improve the water resistance of the pouches, an important feature if you choose to use them for electronic equipment like I do.

The pack also has a large bungee compressible mesh stow-it pocket on the back and two mesh side pockets, none of which I've had cause to use to date. There is no doubt I could carry a lot of equipment if I choose to do so by taking advantage of all of these storage options.

Hydration Features:
Temperatures during the Arizona winter and early spring tend to be fairly moderate with highs in the 70's F (low 20's C). ValveAs a result, I find a single three quart (three liter) water reservoir is usually sufficient to remain hydrated during a medium or even long hike, which is what I carried on my first hike with the SpeeDemon. On returning home from the hike, I noticed that the bottom of the pack was wet and upon closer examination, found that the water reservoir had a leak where the drinking water tube was connected to the bladder. I boxed up the reservoir, marked the leak and returned it to the vendor for replacement. A few weeks later, Ultimate Direction sent a new reservoir back to me, however, I was surprised to find that it was an older model without the kicker valve or neoprene sleeve on the drinking tube. I give the vendor good marks for the speed of their return but mark them down for not replacing the defective equipment with an identical item. 

Though I only used the reservoir with the kicker valve on one hike, I will describe my experience. First let me say that I have an Ultimate Direction water bottle that sports a kicker valve. To take a drink from the bottle I just pull out the kicker valve with my teeth and squeeze the bottle. With this back pressure the valve opens wide, delivering a large quantity of water in a quick burst. Simply put, the system works quite well. Unfortunately this is not the case with the reservoir. Instead of relying on back pressure to open the valve as with the bottle, suction is needed with the reservoir. My experience is that I am not able to generate a comparable amount of force using suction and, as a result, get very little water from nozzle. In addition, whenever I took my mouth away from the nozzle a small amount of air would get in backing the water up the drinking tube. This resulted in my having to suck out a few swallows of air before getting to the water next time I wanted a drink.

The replacement reservoir provided by Ultimate Direction has what I believe to be the older nozzle design, which consisted of a more typical bite valve. The valve is mounted on a swivel which acts to turn the nozzle off and on (as illustrated in the photo below). The bite valve has a groove running along the top and bottom for the user to place their teeth and two holes in the tip which allow water to escape. With several hikes under my belt testing this older design, I can say that the new kicker valve, while not great, is a definite improvement. I am not sure whether the tooth groove is placed in the wrong location to sufficiently open the holes or whether the holes are too small to release much water, but I find that I really have to work (sucking and chewing on the bite valve) to get a drink from this reservoir.

bitevalve2

Lest it is thought that there is nothing about the reservoir that I like, there are several features that I find quite appealing. I have found that with either reservoir that the polyurethane construction adds little taste to the water. Some reservoirs have a strong and distinct rubber or plastic taste to them. The taste added by the UD reservoir is quite mild. I also like the fact that the reservoir has a strip of plastic internally which gives it a flattened shape which tends to keep it from rolling when placed on a slanted or uneven surface. I am somewhat neutral about the roll top closure system though (similar to a dry bag, but secured in place with hook and loop fastener). I have found that the roll top is easy to use, is secure, and does not leak, all of which is good. I just haven't identified any advantage that this confers over other reservoirs that have a screw in lid (which are also easy to use, secure and do not leak).

When filled, the water reservoir is placed in the pack and the drinking tube routed through a drinking tube port located in the center of the pack just behind the wearers back. It seems that many manufacturers make the drinking tube port very small, in order to reduce the chance of rain getting in and soaking the contents of your pack. While this serves its purpose, it can be difficult to get the tube through the port. The SpeeDemon pack has a large port for the drinking tube, making it easy to thread before the hike. UD has solved the rain problem by placing an elasticized shingle over this port to protect it from rain. I have not have the opportunity to test whether this feature does indeed keep water out of the pack, but certainly like how easy it is to get the tube through the hole. Once outside the pack, the drinking tube can then be routed through elastic straps that are found on either shoulder strap. My experience is that this system does a good job of holding the drinking tube in place over my shoulder and allows easy access to the bite valve. I've found though that the drinking tube is quite a bit longer than the last elastic strap on the shoulder strap (and needs to be to get it to my mouth). The problem with this is that there is about a foot of drinking tube that hangs free from the last elastic strap. As I walk the bite valve bounces up and down with the result that it taps me in the abdomen with each step. Not a big deal, but a minor annoyance. I've since added an alligator clip to the tube so that I can secure it to a strap so that it doesn't sway.

Lastly, on one hike I utilized the removable water bottle holster which mounts on the shoulder strap and carried a 20oz (0.6 liter) water bottle. The holster held the bottle securely and provided ready access to another water source besides the reservoir. This might be useful for adventure racers who might not want to stop to refill, but I found that the weight pulled awkwardly on my shoulder strap and that the bulky water bottle somewhat interfered with the natural swing of my arms. For future hikes if I need extra water I'll likely just place the bottles inside the pack and take a minute to use them to refill my reservoir when it runs dry.

Durability:
Several of the hikes during this test period involved pushing through brush and hiking off trail. Despite being subjected to clawing branches and prickly plants, the SpeeDemon appears as good as new. The 70D nylon fabric from which the pack is made is quite slick and seems to resist snagging. I have found that the mesh sides tend to snag, but they have not been damaged to date.

 
Summary:
 
My experience with the Ultimate Direction SpeeDemon Ultralight Backpack has been mixed to date. The pack is light weight and has enough storage capacity to carry plenty of gear and allows easy access to all the most frequently used items (water, snacks and camera) without having to stop and take off the pack. I would prefer the suspension system to provide more in the way of support, however, and do a better job of transferring the bulk of the pack's weight to my hips.
 
Likes:
  • Light weight.
  • Plenty of storage room for day hikes, could easily be used for light weight overnight trips.
  • Plenty of hydration options.
  • Hydration tube fits easily through the hole in the back of the pack.
  • Hip belt pockets are very useful for carrying a camera and snacks.
  • The water reservoir is fairly stable when placed on uneven ground.
  • There is little taste to water in the reservoir compared with other hydration systems I have used.
Areas for Improvement:
  • The water reservoir pocket is cut too large and is not elasticized, causing it to get in the way of loading gear into the main compartment.
  • The pack's foam suspension is weak, resulting in pack slump when the pack is not completely filled.
  • Load lifters do a mediocre job lifting the pack weight off the hiker's shoulders.
  • The water reservoir nozzle on both the old and new reservoir doesn't work very well for me.
  • Load lifters are displaced from the pack's shoulder straps when the adjustable suspension system is raised.
  • I'd like to see waterproof zippers added to the hip belt pouches, since I use them to carry my camera.
General Comments:
  • Waterproof zippers are a little stiff to open & close.
  • When I pick up the pack by a single shoulder strap, the continuous strap slips and it becomes very long and somewhat awkward to carry.
  • The removable shoulder strap mounted water bottle holsters get in the way of the natural swing of my arm.

Long Term Test Plan:
Over the next 4 months, I plan to conduct additional tests on the SpeeDemon. I have several hiking trips planned in Arizona and Utah and plan to use the SpeeDemon exclusively during this time. I am hoping to further test: comfort in the heat of the AZ summer, rain and wind resistance during the summer monsoons and longer term durability.



Read more reviews of Ultimate Direction gear
Read more gear reviews by Todd L. Martin

Reviews > Packs > Frameless Backpacks and Day Packs > Ultimate Direction SpeeDemon > Todd Martin > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson