BackpackGearTest
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Packs > Internal and External Framed Backpacks > Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude Ki > Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd > Field Report

Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude Ki 
Field Report
July 19, 2005

Contents:
     Tester Information
     Product Information
     Report

Tester Information

Name: Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd

Location: Los Altos, CA

Age/Sex: 27/Female

Height: 5'5" (1.65 m)

Weight: 125 lb (57 kg)

Email: rebecca@backpackgeartest.org

Website: http://www.calipidder.com

I began backpacking in the summer of 2000 after moving to California. Although I started off carrying everything but the kitchen sink, my style has shifted to lightweight gear and techniques, though I am known to carry a few luxury items (mmm...pillow). First in my heart is summer backpacking, but I also enjoy snowshoeing, skiing, and snowcamping, as well as long dayhikes and peak climbing. I spend time outside during weekends year-round in the deserts and mountains of California. My weekend hikes are often 'spur-of-the-moment', and usually occur in and around Yosemite National Park, Desolation Wilderness (near Lake Tahoe), and Sonora Pass in the Sierra Nevada mountains, as well as Lassen National Park and Mt. Shasta area in the Southern Cascades.

Product Information

Name: Nimbus Latitude Ki

Manufacturer: Granite Gear

Manufacturer website: www.granitegear.com

Year of Manufacture: 2005

Listed Weight:  3 lbs. 14 oz. (1.75 kg) 

Measured weight: 3 lbs. 10 oz. (1.64 kg) 

Cubic Inches: 3900 (64 L)

Front view
For a detailed description of the Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude Ki, please see my Initial Report.

Field Report

In my Initial Report I had two main areas which I wished to evaluate on this pack.  The first was packability - with such a different design than I am used to, how easy would it be for me to fit my gear in the Granite Gear Ki?   The second was the comfort of the pack - how would it carry with different weights inside?  Would it balance well, and would I feel okay after carrying it mile after mile?  During the Field Test period I was able to use the Ki on three very different trips.  Each of these three trips allowed the Ki to be evaluated in different ways and I already feel like I have a good understanding of the packability, comfort, and capabilities of this pack.

Packed for winterTrip 1: April 30 - May 1.  Loch Leven Lakes, Tahoe National Forest

This trip was an overnight in the snow.  Although it was relatively warm out for snow camping, late afternoon rain (which later turned to snow) required that all necessary waterproof gear was carried in addition to the normal snowcamping load.  As my first trip with the Granite Gear Ki, I was faced with the challenge of not only packing it for the first time, but also fitting in more gear than I usually need to carry.  Fortunately my husband carried the shelter in his pack so that I was able to carry the Ki (with a bivy).  Otherwise, it would have been a hair too small for this large load. 

The load I carried consisted of the following items:

Interior

  • Zero degree down sleeping bag and liner in compression sack (laid sideways in the bottom of the pack with no room on either side)
  • Insulmat Max Thermo sleeping pad (approximately the size of a Nalgene bottle)
  • Jetboil PCS (fuel carried inside)
  • Mountain Hardwear Conduit SL Bivy (approximately the size of a Nalgene bottle)
  • Snowpeak Double Walled Ti Mug
  • Stuff sack of Clothing (dry layer, socks, hat, gloves, down booties, etc)
  • Outerwear (down jacket, Goretex jacket, waterproof pants)
  • Food and kitchen bag (packed in the provided interior storage sack, discussed below)
  • Bag of misc smaller items (lighter, compass, headlamp, toiletries, first aid, etc)
  • Camera
  • Silnylon sheet

Exterior (see picture)

  • Trekking poles (until I needed them)
  • Snowclaw
  • Waterbottles (one in each side pocket)
  • Ridge Rest Sleeping pad
  • Ridge Rest sit pad (rolled up inside sleeping pad and strapped to the outside as shown in the picture)
  • Pole for Golite Hex 2

This is my normal winter load (I will leave out the heavy Goretex jacket and waterproof pants in favor of lighter weight layers if there is no snow or rain in the forecast).  I fit this load regularly into a similarly sized pack but struggled a bit with the Ki.  This was my first attempt at packing the Granite Gear Ki.  Due to its unusual design (to me) it took some getting used to.  I repacked it about five times before I was satisfied and everything fit in comfortably.  When it was all packed and the water bottles filled I weighed in at a hair under 30 lbs.   Normally, my winter weight is closer to 35 lbs because the pack I usually use is much heavier.  It already scored bonus points with me before I even hit the trail!

The real test came when I took this load into the backcountry.  While the snowshoe trek into camp was rather short, there was a bit of steep terrain to cross and route finding to do.  During the approximately three hour hike into camp I didn't feel uncomfortable once.  The pack never nagged or rubbed in an uncomfortable way.  I had to adjust the Ki a couple of times, but that was due to the layers I kept removing as I heated up while climbing those Tahoe 'hills'. 

Although I won't encounter snowy conditions before the Long Term report is due, I will likely be using this again as a winter pack.  Most likely it will be used in mild winter conditions where I don't have to carry my heavy waterproof gear, which is a bit bulky and takes up valuable space in the Ki.  I am eager to try it out with a shovel and ice axe strapped to the outside!

I also found out on this trip how much I love the side pockets.  The lower side pockets are enormous - they each fit a wide mouthed Nalgene bottle, as well as a trekking pole handle end.  In addition, one of them contained the Hex 2 pole as well, which is a 1-inch diameter pole that collapses to four pieces.  The side pockets are stretchy and tall, allowing for this amount of gear to be crammed into them.  The upper side pockets, which zip shut, can get in the way of taller items stashed in the lower pockets (like the trekking poles) when big things are put in them, but for shorter items (like the water bottles) this isn't an issue.

Trip 2: May 21-22.  Henry Coe State Park, California. 

In contrast to all of the snowcamping we had been doing for the past several months (and to save some gas money), my husband and I chose a somewhat local and low-elevation overnight backpack to welcome summer to the Bay Area.  Our overnight loop hike of approximately fifteen miles took us through many unmaintained grassy paths (often so overgrown that we had to make our own trail in shoulder high grass) and up and down the many steep hills for which Henry Coe is well known.  This was the first weekend of summer temperatures in the Bay Area and conditions were hot and sunny.  I packed a complete self-sufficient summer load on this trip (no gear shared between my husband and I).  At this point, I had the experience of packing for winter in the Ki.  This made packing for summer seem easy.  When fully loaded, the pack wasn't  even completely full.  The difference between my summer and winter load was:

  • A much lighter and more compressible sleeping bag
  • No Ridge Rest sleeping pad
  • Less extra and bulky clothing layers
  • Winter down jacket replaced with lightweight Montbell liner jacket
  • No shovel/Snowclaw
  • No bivy
  • No silnylon sheet
  • No rainwear outerwear
  • Added a Tarptent Cloudburst

The load for this trip, once completely packed with food and water, was approximately 20 lbs.   Again, the pack was quite comfortable.  This time I was only wearing a lightweight wicking tank top with tiny spaghetti shoulder straps.  The pack straps were perfectly comfortable against my skin.

As I started the first steep climb and began to sweat I noticed that sweat was drenching my back.  The Ki doesn't have any fancy circulation channels built into the back padding - it is a solid pad that lays flat against the back.  The material and padding is definitely comfortable, but as someone who sweats a lot I get a bit soaked back there.  When I remove the pack after sweating the padding is pretty wet but the material dries out quickly.  I've used packs that breathe better than the Ki, but the advantage of the Ki is that it is comfortable enough that I don't notice it until I remove the pack and feel how wet my back is.

 

On the trailTrip 3: June 11-12.  Hetch Hetchy area (Smith Peak), Yosemite National Park. 

This trip was one of the most enjoyable backpacks I have done. It was a loop hike of approximately 20 miles and 5000 feet of total elevation gain/loss.  Due to its lower elevation and the late season snow that remains in the majority of the park, many backpackers were visiting the Hetch Hetchy area that weekend.  My husband and I chose a less-traveled trail on the south side of the reservoir (the popular trails all go to the north side) that took us to the summit of Smith Peak which overlooks the Hetch Hetchy region and the northern Yosemite high country beyond.  We camped at a perfect site on the boulder-strewn peak, but the terrain we passed through to get us there was rather adventurous.  With the high streams, overgrown and unmaintained trail, and lots of fallen trees, the hike took plenty of mental and physical energy to find our way around obstacles.  On this trip, carrying a nearly identical load to the Henry Coe trip, the stability and balance of the pack became very important to me, as I found myself wading across streams and struggling over giant toppled trees blocking the trail. 

It was on this trip that  I decided I really love the Granite Gear Ki.  It may have a much different design than many packs on the market, but these differences are all very positive ones for me.  First of all, I love the stretchy access panel.  I can access gear from the top or the bottom of the pack without disturbing anything else.  I'm not used to stashing things I may need along the trail in the bottom of my pack, but it's so easy to unzip the panel from the bottom and reach in and grab the camera.  I'm definitely sold on this design - accessing gear is much, much easier than any top-loading pack I've used.  One of my top-loaders has an access zipper in the front pocket, but it is pretty useless since in order to open it I have to remove everything in the pocket.  Not with the Ki - I can get to almost anywhere in the interior of the pack without unpacking everything else.  The interior compression straps (two of them) help with this as well.  I can unzip the entire panel while the pack is laying on the ground and everything will still stay put (provided I packed it well).

In the beginning I thought I would miss having a top pocket, but I don't miss it at all!  I think my favorite feature of the Ki's design is the headroom it provides.  Without the top pocket I can wear a wide brimmed sun or rain hat and still be able to look up at the massive granite peaks and giant sequoias of Yosemite National Park without bumping my head.  The large stretchy side pockets (both top and bottom) allow me to externally stash any gear I would normally carry in a lid, so there really is no difference of accessibility.

In place of a top lid pocket, Granite Gear provides an interior pocket.  Admittedly, I thought this feature was just plain silly when I got the pack.  And now I have found myself devoting three paragraphs to it!  On a most basic level it is simply a storage sack.  Why have an extra storage sack?  If I want one I can buy one myself!  At least, that's the thought I had originally.  But, after using this handy pocket I have found it to be one of my favorite things about the Ki.  Of course, if I didn't want to use it I could leave it at home, but so far it has come along on all of my trips.  I use it similarly to how I would use any pack's top pocket.  But, with the soft padded bottom and drawstring top it's more useful, and I keep it by my side like a security blanket when I'm in camp. 

When I pack the Ki, I use the storage sack for all of my food and toiletries.  Anything edible or smelly goes in it.  Since I hike in bear country it is important for me to keep track of all the smelly things so that when it comes time to store my gear for the evening I don't have to locate a bunch of things scattered around camp.   I also throw in any small things I'll want access to once in camp, like my headlamp.  I stash things I will need on the trail in the pack's upper side pockets (chapstick, sunscreen, snacks), and move them to the storage sack once I am in camp.  The storage sack has two clips to connect it to the interior of the pack at the top, but so far I haven't really needed to do this - I simply pack this storage sack in with all of my other stuff sacks.  If I were carrying less gear I may clip it into the top to distribute the weight and load a bit.

Once I have picked a campsite I can set up my shelter, stash all of my gear inside, and put everything I might need for cooking and the evening in the storage sack.  I can then stash the empty Ki in the back of my shelter and forget about it until the morning - all of my small things and food is available and by my side in the storage sack.  Something about this sack is much more useful than any generic storage sack - I haven't figured out if it's the size (perfect for all of my small gear and food for an overnighter), the padded bottom (allows it to sit in an upright position, and also insulates food items when the bag is set on the snow), or the convenient cinch-top (easy access to everything, unlike a top lid pocket with a bajillion zippers).  When the cinch top is opened it is kind of like a big bucket.  It is such a simple thing, yet I love it!  

When I see photos of myself wearing this pack I am bugged by how low it seems to fit.  I've also had this impression of other Granite Gear packs I have seen my hiking companions using.  But I think this is an illusion based on the fact that there is no top lid to many of the Granite Gear packs.  I am so used to seeing long and narrow packs with towering top lids that the somewhat short and fat form of the Ki just looks wrong.  However, when it is worn I don't notice an unusual feeling at all.  The weight is distributed comfortably and I actually feel much more in control and balanced than I do when I'm wearing one of those long and narrow packs. 

This became very clear to me on the Hetch Hetchy hike.  Since the trail we chose was far less popular than other places in the park it had not yet been cleared of the winter deadfall.  Enormous dead trees criss crossed the trail and the water levels were still quite high.  The meadows were marshy and I was pretty much covered in mud from the knees down.  These trail conditions meant that having a stable load was necessary, and I was extremely pleased about how the Ki performed.  The lower and wider shape of the pack seemed to help with the stability and I never stumbled because of the weight on my back, even when leaning forward while hopping over an enormous log.

Summary

Although I have only had the Ki out on three overnight trips so far, I am already extremely happy with the pack's features and comfort.  It's unique design suits my backpacking style well and I look forward to taking it out on many more trips in the Long Term test period.

 



Read more reviews of Granite Gear gear
Read more gear reviews by Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd

Reviews > Packs > Internal and External Framed Backpacks > Granite Gear Nimbus Latitude Ki > Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson