Personal Biographical Information:
Name: Andr\'e9 Corterier
Height: 1.85 m (6 ft 1 in)
Weight: 80 kg (175 lb)
Home: Bonn, Germany
\f1\fs24 I mostly dayhike and sometimes overnight by myself or in the company of one or both of my little daughters. I am getting started on longer hikes, as a lightweight packer and hammock or tarp camper.\f0\fs20 I\rquote ve been upgrading my old gear and am now carrying a
dry FSO weight (everything carried From the Skin Out except food, fuel and water)
of less than 9 kg (20 lb) for three-season camping.
Year of manufacture: 2008 ?
From the website and accompanying tag:
Manufacturer: Integral Designs (Canada)
MSRP: 200.00 USD
"The Sil Dome is a minimalist tarp shelter that utilizes a single 12 ft [3.66 m] shock corded Easton .340 [8.64 mm] nanolite pole to provide its parabolic shape and
allow the catenary cut 1.1 oz Silicone impregnated nylon to be tightly set up in a variety of configurations. It can be set up as an elevated dome
day shelter, a ground level two-person sleep shelter with side ventilation or rolled back into an open-fronted awning wind shelter.
Available colours: Grey, Olive Green and Yellow - the Olive Green model was tested
Interior length: 8 ft [2.44 m] Interior width: 5 ft [1.52 m]
1 lb 10 oz (740g) including pole
wt excludes 2.2 mil cord + 4 stakes (4 oz)
Supplied with 2.2 mil cord and 4 - 6" Easton nano stakes (4 oz, 115 g)"
tarp: 485 g (17.11 oz) - before seam sealing
pole: 166 g (5.86 oz)
4 stakes: 38 g (1.34 oz)
4 cords: 44 g (1.55 oz)
large sack: 14 g (0.49 oz)
small sack: 12 g (0.42 oz)
total weight as delivered (including stakes and bag, minus seam sealant): 764 g (26.95 oz or 1 lb 10.95 oz)
Note: The weights do not add up precisely to the total amount, I assume my digital gram scale rounded a few times.
The SilDome, when set up, looks like a single-hoop tunnel tent from the outside. But it doesn't have a floor, or interior mosquito netting, so it's really
a tent-shaped tarp. It's made from the now becoming ubiquitous siliconized 1.1-oz ripstop nylon often referred to as "Silnylon". It features a tunnel seam
for the flexible pole, 8 webbing loops around the bottom edge for staking down, three webbing loops on top of the pole ridge and an adjustable inside strip
of webbing to adjust the width of the tent.
The package came with 4 stakes, 6 in (15 cm) in length. That's pretty short for a stake, I thought - but it was sufficient to set up the tarp for the first
two times (practice). Also included were four small rolls of black cord. I'm at a loss trying to figure out how I could possibly use four cords at the same
time - I assume I'll need at least one stake staked through a bottom loop no matter how I set this baby up. We'll see. Four stakes also didn't strike me as
a lot. Again, we'll see how many I will seem to need when using it in the field.
The SilDome comes in a long, slender silnylon bag. Upon opening it, I first withdrew the folded pole. It's a rather slender, hollow pole made from flexible
aluminum with shock cord running through it which keeps the segments together (and assists in putting them together). Next I took out the tarp, which was
neatly folded though no creases remained in the silnylon once I shook it out (which also means that I'll never be able to put it back together like that).
And then there was a small black bag which contained four small stakes, four loops of cord and a tube of silicone seam sealant.
The latter stumped me for a moment. Neither the website nor the accompanying tag mention seam sealing in any way, shape or form. But I note that the tarp
does have seams and they do not appear to have been taped or in any other way waterproofed, so I guess this will be up to me. It seems strange that this isn't
even mentioned on the accompanying card.
The SilDome was easy to set up. I shook out the tarp, then quickly assembled the pole and slid it through the tunnel on the inside of the tarp. The pole ends
in metal points which easily fit into the metal grommets in the bottom webbing band. As the bottom band is of a shorter length than the pole, this forces the
pole to flex into a flattened semi-circle. This semi-circle initially remained on the ground, as nothing held it up. Then I staked one end of the tarp down
and pulled on the other end and - presto, instant shelter. All it took was to stake down the other end and I had a self-supporting shelter. At this point, I
was still left with two stakes and four rolls of cord (and a tube of seam sealant) that I hadn't even used yet.
However, the tarp initially didn't seem to conform to a nice, tent-like shape. While the tarp went down close to the ground at the end points which were
staked down and the side points where the pole stuck in the bottom webbing band, the side walls of the tarp seemed to curve upward a little between those
points, creating what looked like more than adequate ventilation (and a potential ingress for rain).
Seeing that the tarp is described as having an interior length of 8 ft (2.44 m) and width of 5 ft (1.52 m), I shortened the bottom webbing strap
(which is length-adjustable via a ladderlock buckle) to about 5 ft or so (1.5 m), which required relocating one stake and moving it a little closer.
The resultant structure looked odd, and the problem I described earlier seemed aggravated: While the staked lengthwise end points were now a little closer to
the pole, this was due to the fact that the pole now had a higher central height which therefore also increased the upward curvature of the tarp's bottom
The reason for this soon became apparent. The tarp has a catenary cut. In layman's terms (I'm a layman) this means it's cut to resemble the curve a rope
would describe when fixed to one spot on the ground at one end and another spot higher up at the other end and left to hang by itself. This creates an equal
distribution of load along the rope. Which, I guess, is why such a shape is considered beneficial for tarps, which may be subject to wind loads. The tarp
appears cut to describe catenary curves from the top of the pole to the bottom of the tarp. This creates a three-dimensional structure, and it works out
only if the pole is fixed at the correct height.
It was easily apparent that the pole's foot ends needed to be further apart, and so I extended the webbing strap, bit by bit, until I found a pitch where the
sides of the tarp followed the ground. Obviously, this was how the tarp was meant to be set up. Easy enough, too - now that I had the bottom webbing strap
adjusted just so, it would immediately form an enclosed shelter with only two stakes. Neat.
The surprise was that, although this was clearly how the tarp was meant to be set up, it was a lot broader and longer on the ground than I had anticipated
due to the measurements given on the accompanying tag. From stake to stake, it was just over 4 m (just over 13 ft) long, and about 2.8 m (over 9 ft) broad
along the pole.
Of course, much of that footprint does not have a useable tarp height over it - catenary curves not only equalize loads, they minimize space. The *useful*
internal space seemed to be about 1.5 m by 2.4 m or 5 ft by 8 ft - just what it says on the tag (and the web). Yay! So I guess I set it up right after all.
I did find this slightly confusing but the tarp's shape speaks for itself.
I tried getting into and out of the SilDome, lying down in it etc. None of this was a problem. The waterproof zipper works. It's a dual zipper, so I can
open a small (or large) gap at the top of the zipper rather than just moving the zipper up and down. I don't know (yet) why I might want to do that, but
the possibility is there. My 6-year old daughter was quite taken with this. Operating the zipper takes two hands, unless one of the loops at the bottom
of the zipper is staked down. Bang, there went the third stake and now the zipper could be operated with one hand. Nice.
The room inside is ample for myself and more gear than I care to carry, thank you. Another grown up should also find space. I'm pretty sure that it'll fit
me and both my six (nearly seven) year old daughter and my two-and-a-half year old daughter. I'll be sure to try this out in the field at least once (my
older daughter now prefers to sleep in her own hammock).
It started raining shortly after I set up the tarp (both times). The water beaded up on the silnylon and then ran down. The seams did not leak any water
during a half hour rain shower, which was good to know. There was some wind the second time I set it up as well, and while the flexible pole moved with
the wind a little, it appeared stable enough with just two stakes.
Well, it's a pretty lightweight solution for the amount of room it creates. I'll be interested to find out whether I'll really make do with two (or three)
stakes or feel the need to carry more. I'll be carrying the full set (and possibly two extras) when trying it out, but will try to find the workable minimum.
I've set up the SilDome near the Rhine River close to home (elevation about 100 m / 330 ft), in the Eifel hills (at about 350 m / 1150 ft) and for two nights in the Netherlands (about 40 m / 150 ft).
Temperatures, precipitation and wind speeds were too boring to have been properly recorded vis-\'e0-vis the first two events. For the two nights in the Netherlands,
temps bottomed out around 4 C (38 F), with quite a bit of rain and serious winds the second night.
I've set up and broken down the tarp and made adjustments to it in broad daylight and at night with a cast-over sky, without the help of a headlamp (don't ask). It was
easy to do - there's nothing finicky about this tarp that would make it hard. Possibly the hardest thing to do is find the entrance of the fabric "tunnel" which accepts
the flexible pole (and to remember that it should be on the inside of the tarp). That's all. And that's nice.
Not so good news on this one. While I've found the tarp to provide lots of storage room for gear when it's just me sleeping in it and the conditions are easy, which means I
sleep in a not-so-thick sleeping bag on a thin pad, colder weather has changed my view on this. In the Netherlands, I was sleeping on my Down Air Mat, at about 7 cm (3 in) of
thickness, in a puffy down bag (rated to -7 C /20 F by its manufacturer). This put the top of my bag easily 10 cm (4 in) or more closer to the sloping ceiling of the SilDome, which meant that
once I started moving about a little in my sleep, the head and foot ends of my sleeping bag spent a good portion of the night in contact with the ceiling. As I also had a
condensation issue (see below), I was glad for the water resistant fabric at the head and foot ends of my bag.
Of course, this was with the sidewalls of the tarp staked down to the very ground. I hardly felt any wind inside the tarp, even though it was quite windy and the tarp was set up
in an exposed place on low grass. For the second night, I decided to pull the strap which regulates the width of the tarp a little closer, in order to create more headroom. This
worked. As the walls of the tarp slope down to the ground in a curve and that curve still has to end up at or very near to the ground, an increase in the center pole's height does
not translate in an equal increase of ceiling height across the tarp. But I managed to change the setup so that I could sleep without (or at least only rarely) contacting the tarp
even on my thick pad and in my puffy bag. However, I suppose two people would find the tarp a squeeze under such conditions.
Limiting the width of the tarp like that not only increases the center height, it also means that the lower hem of the tarp no longer follows the ground precisely, but rather curves up a little
between the stake out points. I managed to find a compromise configuration in which I was okay with the head height without going into an all-out stork-legged shape. I was actually
quite happy with it having ventilation slits along the bottom, though I staked it down as much as I could on the windward side.
The first night in the Netherlands was condensation prone: I set up on wet grass, there was some fog and sprinkly rain through the night. I had the tarp staked down so it hugged the ground
and the door closed. Now that I'm laying the facts out like that, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised to find a lot of condensation after spending a night under an effective cheese cover. Yet,
I was surprised to find drops of moisture dropping onto my face at night.
The second night fared much better in this regard. We were still camped in the same spot and I changed the configuration as described above, which created ventilation openings around the
bottom rim of the tarp (which I - successfully - tried to minimize on the windward side). I also used the dual zipper to create a small opening at the top of the zipper in order to create a vent
there without letting in too much rain. This seemed to have worked very well (maybe that's why it's a dual zipper). Even though there was a lot of wind (calling it a storm would not be an
overstatement) very few drops were blown inside and there was very little condensation the next day.
While I wasn't rained on during the second night, I did wake up when the sidewall of the tarp hit me in the face. The tarp created the strangest three-dimensional contortions under the influence of severe
wind pressure. The pole flexed considerably as well, forming the outline of half an egg lying on its side or a rectangle with rounded corners, but each time springing back into its usual shape. This
allowed the sides of the tarp considerable freedom of movement. I decided to go out at night and guy out the side of the pole sleeve which faced the wind. This was easily accomplished with the
provided guy line and not hard to do even at night, without a lamp. The attachment points at the tarp are easy to pick out at night.
This markedly improved the wind resistance of the tarp. The pole flexed very little thereafter. The sides of the tarp still flexed and bowed, but it rarely contacted me inside and certainly
didn't slap me again. While this was somewhat noisy, it wasn't all that noticeable over the general sound of the wind and rain. While I was lying there in the tarp, listening to the general ruckus, I was
making mental notes of negative things to report in my test report until I fell asleep again. The next morning it turns out that about half an hour after my daughter vacated her hammock because
she was getting a bit scared, the wind tore the rain fly off her (name brand) hammock. So... it appears that it really was a LOT of wind the tarp was exposed to, and I have to say I felt very little
of it inside the tarp. So I'm happy with that.
The stakes went into the ground easily each time (though I have to admit it wasn't challenging ground, stake-wise). They held fast and did a good job of keeping the tarp in place. In easy conditions, I found
two stakes to be sufficient (three if I want to open the door with one hand). In the windiest night, I used five stakes on the windward side (four on the hem of the tarp and one for the guyline) and another
one on the lee side. This makes me think that I would generally want to carry six ("always have a spare").
Long Term Report
I've set up the tarp three more times, at elevations between 100 and 300 m (330 and 1000 ft), in temps above, but not far above, freezing. There wasn't appreciable precipitation and only light winds. In short, boring conditions in comparison to the
tempest the tarp was exposed to in the field report.
My daughters aren't large (at seven and nearly three years of age), and they fit under the tarp with me, in their sleeping bags.
The little one is more of a problem than the older one, because she's got a rather voluminous blanket-shaped sleeping bag
(to go over her standard - indoor - sleeping bag with arm holes) and that threatens to lay in such a way that with a minimum
of movement she'll push a corner of it out underneath the bottom ventilations of the tarp. Staking that side down to the very
ground helps, but I'm not happy to reduce ventilation when I've got three people breathing underneath it
The taller one has a proper mummy-shaped sleeping bag which attaches to her kid-size self-inflating pad and presents much
less of a challenge. So the smart money seems to put the little one on the windward side, with the two inner stakes staking
the center of the tarp down to the very ground. Anyway, it'll fit me and my two daughters. Not too much gear as well, but I
pack as lightly as possible when I'm already carrying the little one so that doesn't seem to present a problem.
Well, there wasn't that much weather to resist. In fact, compared to the two nights in the Netherlands I haven't encountered
much weather since then. Well, there was that one night here in Bonn where the wind was actually stronger, but that
overturned a 40-ton-truck, so there. In retrospect, I'm actually happy I didn't look for a more sheltered spot in the Netherlands,
because the trees hadn't been shedding just leaves, they'd been shedding branches.
Compared to that, I was much to blasÚ about wind to notice much of whatever amount of wind was actually going around at night around here. There wasn't much rain, either, I guess. There must have been a sprinkle here and there given the amount of wet ground the next day, but I didn't notice any of that at night (little kids do that to me).
Overall, the tarp seemed to do an excellent job of keeping weather at bay.
Often the reverse side of the coin vis-Ó-vis weather resistance, and that proved to be the case here as well. The way to escape
stronger weather seems to be to turn the tarp into more of a cheese cover, with concomitant condensation problems. These
can be somewhat alleviated by leaving a small open slit at the top of the zipper at the entrance. Of course, I'm loathe to do
that on a cold night, as having an air vent in the top of a structure lets the heat out pretty well, but I guess them's the breaks.
Given less than adverse weather, allowing for some ventilation underneath the bottom of the tarp all around and
with a little ventilation slit at the top of the zipper worked very well. While there was condensation on the inside surface
of the tarp right above my head, it wasn't much and none of it fell on me. I was happy with that.
I've continued to carry six stakes, just to be on the safe side. When by myself, in mediocre conditions, I only need to use
three. One goes at either end of the tarp to maintain the structure (the sides with the pole generally didn't need to be staked
down, they were held in place well enough by the center strip), and one at the foot of the zipper to allow one-handed operation.
No issues to report. The tarp has dirt clinging to it in a few spots because I'm not the most scrupulous about cleaning these
things, but I have no reason to doubt that given a high pressure hose (or a sponge and soapy water and half an hour to kill), I
could make it look like new.
I'm moderately happy with it. I'll be very happy with it in summer, I'm sure - when I need it more for rain protection and a bit
of wind protection and heat isn't a problem (and I use less bulky gear inside), I'll be happy to have such a spacious shelter
at that little weight. Being able to shelter me and both of my daughters at less than a pound and a half is an awesome
achievement - the kind of thing I need to allow me to keep hiking with both of them until the little one is tall enough to walk
herself and maybe carry her own food.
Given current weather (just above or around freezing, general tendency towards the wet), I'm less thrilled with it because it
seems to include a lot of volume which doesn't translate into useful volume for me because of its steeply sloped sides at the
head and foot end.
Overall - a great very lightweight solution for our warmer weather shelter needs.
This concludes my test report on the Integral Desings SilDome tarp. I'd like to thank Integral Designs and BackpackGearTest.org for letting me test this item.
Read more reviews of Integral Designs gear
Read more gear reviews by Andre Corterier