BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Shelters > Tents > MSR Missing Link > Andrew Priest > Field Report

MOUNTAIN SAFETY RESEARCH (MSR) MISSING LINK TENT

Pitched at Long Point campsite, Bibbulmun Track

Field Report
June 9, 2004

Table of Contents


Andrew Priest, Tester and Author of this Report
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
aushiker@yahoo.com.au

I am a 44 year old male, 180 cm (5' 11") in height and I weigh 100 kg (220 lbs).  I have been hiking in Western Australia for approximately five years. For the past four years I have been regularly walking and now leading walks with the Perth Bushwalkers Club. These bushwalks range from all on-track to all off-track pack-carries. I consider myself as moving towards being a lightweight tent-carrying bushwalker with my pack base weight in the 8 to 12 kg (18 to 26 lb) range.  In 2003 I completed my End to End of the Bibbulmun Track. I have also end to ended the Cape to Cape Track and the Coastal Plains Walk Track.

[Click here to return to the top]

Information about the MSR Missing Link

Description, year of manufacturer and MSRP: The Missing Link tent, which is manufactured by Mountain Safety Research (MSR), is a two person, three season, single wall tent with a single entrance. The tent fly is made from 30D ripstop nylon, 1500 mm PU/silicone coated. The floor, according to MSR is made of 70D 190T 5000 mm PU coated material. The model I am testing was supplied in 2004 and at the time of writing has a retail price of $229.95 US.


Weights and measurements:  MSR reported package weight of the Missing Link is 1.6 kg (3 lb 7 oz) (excludes trekking pole). My measured weight of the tent as delivered and excluding trekking poles is 1.7 kg (3 lb 12 oz). My weights are as recorded by my Arlec kitchen digital scales.

Listed measurements (My measurements):

Floor - Front Edge - 3.3 m (11 ft) - 3.15 m (10.33 ft)
Floor - Rear Edge - 1.8 m (6 ft) - 1.78 m (5.83 ft)
Floor - Left and right Edges - Not given - 1.63 m (5.33 ft)

Door - Base - Not given  - 1.26 m (4.13 ft)
Door - Height - Not given -  1.02 m (3.33 ft) 

Awning  - Edge width - Not given - 1.00 m (3.25 ft)
Awning - Leading edge length - Not given - 2.74 m (9.00 ft)
Awning - Width at centre - Not given - 66 cm (2.17 ft).

[Click here to return to the top]

My Experience Using the MSR Missing Link in the Field

Testing Location Overview:  The hiking environment of the south-west of Western Australia allows for hiking and backpacking from coastal plains to forest. Elevation ranges from 0 to 585 metres (0 to 1,920 feet). Within this region, I hike in varying conditions from forestry roads, to sandy tracks to single-purpose walking trails, to rock hopping, to beach walking to completely off-track walking through open and dense country.

[Click here to return to the top]

Weather Conditions: During the summer period, daytime temperatures average 30 C (86 F), whereas from March through to December the daytime average temperatures range from 15 C to 26 C (59 F to 79 F). During the autumn, winter, and spring periods the normal weather pattern is fairly wet with frequent heavy rainstorms evident. It does not normally snow in Western Australia.

According to The Times Atlas of the World (Concise Edition - Revised 1997) our weather is described as being "Mediterranean - rainy climates with mild winters, coolest month above 0 C (32 F), but below 18 C (64 F); warmest month above 10 C (50 F)." The atlas depicts the coastal area north of Los Angeles as having the same climate.

[Click here to return to the top]

Field experience:

Over the past two months I have spent some four nights over three backpacking trips in the MSR Missing Link. Not as much time as I would have liked, but life has conspired against me. That said I have used the tent in varying conditions with varying results. Rain has however eluded me. For the record I pitched the tent at Monadnocks campsite in March on a fine and warm night with little wind. The second backpack was again in March to Crystal Springs and Long Point campsites where the ground is quite sandy. Again mild fine nights, no rain and little wind. The third backpack was in May to Chadoora and Swamp Oak campsites.  Due to a late arrival at Chadoora (11:30 PM) I decided to sleep in the shelter so the Missing Link was only pitched on the second night at Swamp Oak.  This was a dry but cold night exposing the tent to potential condensation conditions.  There was little wind.

My comments on the Missing Link, based on the above camping experiences, follow. As is my approach, my comments are framed against the manufacturer's claims with additional comments wrapping up.  MSR's claims in respect of the Missing Link are:

Claim 1: Plenty of interior space, including great headroom for two plus gear.

I have to date only used the Missing Link as a solo tent due to my partner experiencing an injury which is excluding her from backpacking.  While it ain't as nice to walk "alone", I do get the tent to myself! Thus from my perspective as a big bloke, this tent is heaven, space wise.  I can spread out, bring all my gear inside, sit up, stretch out, you name it, there is room to do it ... well maybe not swinging the cat. Bottom line is, that in this configuration it is roomy indeed. I am quite happy with its weight to space ratio, even when used as a solo tent.

Illustration of guy rope being used to maximise interior space.Whoops, one qualification. I have found that space utilisation is restricted if the rear of the tent is not guyed out at the centre. What I mean is that the slope of the rear wall tends to "intrude" into one's space thus limiting sitting up room and general movement, particularly if sleeping against the rear wall. That said, I have found that guying out the centre of the rear wall makes a quite surprising improvement to interior space and its utilisation.  I now, even when using the tent solo, guy out the centre of the rear wall to get that extra bit of interior space utilisation and hence comfort.

Claim 2: Awning provides 180° views and a covered food prep/boot storage area

I suspect that the real effectiveness or otherwise of the awning will not come to the fore until the Missing Link is used in wet weather. Unfortunately Hughie has conspired against me to date in this regard. That said, my experience does indicate that I can easily crouch under the awning to gain easy access to the tent and that it is likely the awning will provide reasonable rain protection (based on some sprinkler experimenting in the backyard). That said, actual field experience in the rain is required to form a firm view on this aspect. 

Related to this, but not really an awning feature so much as a door feature, I have found the combo of the large entrance and the awning does make transferring of my gear from my pack to the interior and vice versa quite easy.  This same combination provides good access to the interior.

Views, vistas and experiencing the great outdoors from your portable home. The combination of the large doorway and awning provides excellent external viewing from within the tent. Great to lay in, nice and warm and cosy in my sleeping bag while watching the sun come up.

Claim 3: Easy to pitch. One person can set it up in less than three minutes using trekking poles or guy cords tied off to an overhead object

MSR claims that one person can set up the Missing Link in less than three minutes.  I have only timed myself early on in my use. My timings indicate it was taking me around four to five minutes to pitch. I suspect that I am a bit quicker now. Either way, based on my experience it is quick to pitch. I have found pitching the tent is quite simple and very easy to do on my own, even in the dark!  I did, however, have a problem getting it pitched tight when pitching in the dark, but I don't think this was a problem of the tent, more my poor eyesight in the dark. 

Attempt to pitch the Missing Link without trekking polesWhilst my preference is to pitch using two trekking poles, I have experimented with the use of guy cords instead of poles.  You can see the outcome of my experiment in the photo on the right. Not a good look!  It became pretty clear that a vertical or near vertical tying off of the guy cords is required to get a proper pitch. Something I was not able to do at this campsite.  Seems this need to tie off near
vertically is in contradiction with MSR's warning about not pitching under trees!  I have, since this experiment stuck to using trekking poles.

Using trekking poles, has raised one issue for me, knocking the poles down.  Maybe it is me, just a bit clumsily or something but I find it easy to knock the poles down and/or apply pressure resulting in a peg or two pulling out of the ground.  This was a particular problem when camping at Long Point, a very sandy area. I suspect bigger and longer pegs would improve things in these conditions.

Related to the topic of pitching, is the subject of guying out the Missing Link.  While I have yet to experience using the tent in windy conditions which would warrant guying it out, I am disappointed that MSR only supplies one guy rope (not attached), which is only 196 cm (77") in length. Only one short guy rope, when the tent comes with three guy out points - both rear corners and centre! 

One final comment related to pitching. This tent does have a big footprint, something that didn't register with me until Long Point campsite, where the tent spaces are fairly small. This is something I will have to take into consideration in the future.

Claim 4: Well ventilated. High and low vents provide constant airflow to reduce condensation.

According to the MSR Fast & Light Owner's Manual, "condensation is the buildup of moisture inside your shelter due to differences between the inside and outside temperatures." MSR suggest three common sources: weather conditions - high humidity, low temperatures and rainy conditions; people; and wet environment.

On the first two bushwalks with the Missing Link I didn't experience significant differences between inside and outside temperatures or rain and therefore no condensation problems. However, on my last backpack, which was a cold night and thus warmer inside the tent, condensation was evident, particularly on the rear interior wall and externally under the awning. It was relatively bad under the awning, where getting in and out of the tent resulted in a noticeable transfer of moisture.   The internal condensation was not too bad, that is my sleeping bag was not getting wet and I had to run my hand over the wall to get a feel for the degree of condensation. Initial experience suggests a reasonable degree of ventilation, even with the door fully closed.

Other comments:

While I had concerns about the colour of the tent, and while I have found the tent to be bright inside in the afternoon sun, I have found the colour and the way it tones the light inside to be quite restful and not intrusive. I made a comment in my notes after my first night out in the tent; "very airy and light feeling in the tent." I feel that this sums up my Missing Link living colour experience.

Nice colour but how does it pack back into its stuff sack? I do find, if I am not thoughtful about my approach, I can easily get air bubbles in the tent making it difficult to get it all into the stuff sack. Says something about the breathability or should that be lack of breathability of the silicone coated nylon!  That said, I do love the nice touch of a handle or strap on the outside of the sack, which makes it easy to hold whilst pulling out the tent. A nice simple feature.

One thing I do miss in this tent is the lack of interior pockets and a laundry rope. The Missing Link has a high ceiling which in my view lends itself to the functionality of a laundry rope. Somewhere to hang the wet jocks and socks, the candle lantern and so on. To me, little things such as interior pockets and a laundry rope would make this tent so much more usable.

From ceiling to floor.  I continue to have my doubts about the thinness of the floor. Nothing specific and nothing experienced to suggest problems, just niggles in the back of my mind. Further use will hopefully provide a better understanding of the durability of the floor. Related to this is the fact that the floor is not a tub floor. While I try to avoid pitching in a water run off or flood area, Australian and New Zealand tents tend to come with tub floors to provide some protection against flash run offs/poor location. The Missing Link does not have a tub floor. Again I have yet to use this tent in torrential rain, so my niggles may be unfounded. I hope to report on this further in my Long-term Report.

[Click here to return to the top]

Concluding comments:

Things I like about the MSR Missing Link:

  • Handle/strap on the stuff sack. A nice useful touch. The wonders of simple things;

  • Space ... so much space;

  • Space to weight ratio.

Things I dislike about the MSR Missing Link:

  • Tying off using guy cords  instead of trekking poles requires, in my experience, near vertical tie offs. Something which in my view limits this option significantly;

  • Provision of only one short guy rope, even though the tent has three guy out points;

  • No interior storage pockets or laundry rope.

My long-term testing will continue to test the various claims made my MSR in addition to exploring further use of the tent in adverse weather conditions and the durability/functionality of the floor. 

[Click here to return to the top]




Read more reviews of MSR gear
Read more gear reviews by Andrew Priest

Reviews > Shelters > Tents > MSR Missing Link > Andrew Priest > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson