![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Sleep Gear > Pads and Air Mattresses > Mt. Washington Foam Pad > Cory K. Lampert > Report ThreeBACKPACKGEARTEST
REPORT
Report #3 for "Mt. Washington"
sleeping pad
Cory Lampert
Date: July 3,
2001
Field Report No.
2
Length:
Overnight
Location: Byers Peak
Wilderness, Bottle Pass
Date: June 29th-30th,
2001
Nighttime Temp: 42
degrees
Weather Conditions: (During test)
Partly cloudy with isolated showers and thunderstorms, wind up to 25 mph, light
precipitation. Snowfields presents, overwise dry and rocky ground with some
vegetation- alpine tundra.
Test Area: Backcountry unestablished
campsite along Byer's Peak trail. Site chosen for extremely rocky
conditions and exposure to above timberline weather. Some scattered
krummholtz, and treeline on either edge of the pass. No water.
Elevation: 11,123.
Performance:
This was a spontaneous trip to a
randomly selected location chosen only with the criteria of rocky, high-altitude
camping in mind. The approach hike was from the Byer's Peak
trailhead in the Fraser Experimental Forest. The trail was steep and
rocky, but short and I reached treeline after about 1.5 miles. Since I had
started late, I wanted to camp quickly. There were absolutely no decent
camping spots and though I found flat areas every one was chock full of rocks,
roots, and pinecones. I chose a slightly sheltered area beneath the saddle
and set up my Sierra Designs Clip Flashlight. The pad arrived safely
fastened under the compression strap of my 1980's EMS pack. I used the pad
to sit atop the rocky saddle and cook dinner and it seemed to offer signifigant
comfort.
I examined the pad before chucking it
into the tent to make sure there were no signs of scratches or rips from the
hike up. Though, I had brushed against many trees, there were no nicks to
be found. The temperature dropped from the high sixties to about 45 as I
unrolled my North Face Cat's Meow and tried to make room for the long pad, my
gear, and the dog. As the dog seemed to be particularly "Princess and the
Pea"-like about the rocks, he soon started sneaking his way onto the foot of the
pad. I had a comfortable pillow of fleece clothes and was sleeping in my
long undies. I fell asleep very quickly and soon found myself waking to
try and find a comfortable position. I found that the small rocks and
bumpy ground were really affecting me, and I was continually tossing from one
side to the other. If I remained on my back the pad was quite comfortable,
but I have trouble sleeping that way all night.
Later in the evening there was a rain
shower and some lightning, which probably did not help me relax back in a deep
slumber. (Does this thing insulate if a bolt comes my way???) I did sleep
comfortably for a few hours on my stomach, using the sleeping bag as a
cushion. I must say that for a Worst Case Scenerio Test, which was the
intention of this field test, I slept well. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would
rate my night's sleep a 5. That is not bad for a worst case test. In
comparing the Mt. Washington to the Ridgerest I used occasionally on the East
Coast, I would rank the Mt. Washington above that pad. I think that it is
more comfortable in harsh conditions. It does not beat the Therma-rest,
but that is another beast altogether.
In the morning, I felt slight soreness
in my lower back, in a concentrated area where I could not avoid a particular
rock from hell. All in all though, I felt I had rested and was ready to
summit the peak. On the hike up to the top, I appreciated the light pack I
was able to carry, but felt that I must find a lower profile way to pack the
pad. It kept bumping into the side of the mountain and as mentioned
before, caught on a few tree branches on the way up.
My impressions at this point are
that: I can definately live with this pad. I would never recommend
this pad to a brand-new backpacker because there are certainly much more
comfortable (and relatively light) pads out there. But, for someone like
myself, who has logged plenty of nights on the trail and is unlikely to whine
about hard ground- it is a very suitable piece of gear.
My long backpack is August 6-13 in
Montana and I will then be able to report on the endurance of both my back and
the pad over time. It seems to insulate well, and I am happy with how
easily I have become accustomed to it. I never thought I could convert
from an inflatable pad, but in my attempt to ever lighten the load this maybe a
step in the right direction. I think if you are going to jump to this
level of comfort, you have to be committed to the complete ultra-light
"way". It is going to be very hard to convince car campers and weekenders
to use this pad when they are going to be sore and grumpy on their one weekend
in the woods. But, for long-distance backpackers and for the seasoned
outdoorsperson, this is not a huge compromise. For those immersed in Light
is Right, this pad will be perfecto along with carrying a cat food stove,
homemade sleeping quilt, mesh bag with straps- and all the other efficient,
light, yet slightly wacky-to-the-mainstream gear choices out there. And
the benefit of this pad, (unlike, not carrying any rain-gear), is that no matter
what, its a light choice that doesn't actually put you in danger- it just may be
a little less comfortable.
Next question: What about mating
two pads? My husband, if he should choose to rise to the challenge of
transcending the Therma-rest, will want to be able to snuggle close on those
cold nights!
Test Plan:
Next on the board:
A long trip in August featuring at least
one night in a shelter. Rain/snow is possible as well... Stay
tuned!
Respectfully Submitted,
Cory Lampert
7/3/01 Read more reviews of High Country gear Reviews > Sleep Gear > Pads and Air Mattresses > Mt. Washington Foam Pad > Cory K. Lampert > Report Three | |||