BackpackGearTest
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Sleep Gear > Pads and Air Mattresses > Mt. Washington Foam Pad > Gerry Gladu > 1st and 2nd Report

                     Backpack Gear Test Report
 
Manufacturer:  High Country Outdoor Products
Web Site:      http://www.highcop.com
Product:       Mt. Washington Sleeping Pad
Item Number:   65600
Tester:        Gerry Gladu
 
Test Number    1
Date Received: May 24, 2001 by UPS
Date Of Test:  May 24, 2001
Location:      Framingham, Massachusetts
 
Instructions:  None   
  Material:    Evazote Foam.
     Color:    Blue
 
Dimensions:  
  Size
  Mfg Spec:    .625 x 20 x 60"
  Measured:    .625 x 19 7/8 x 58" 
 Rolled Up:    6 1/2 x 19 7/8"
  
  Weight
  Mfg Spec:    7 oz
  Measured:    7.7 oz, Straps 1.5 oz
 
Condition and Completeness
 
The product came in excellent condition and was rolled up and enclosed with two straps. All components were present and it is exactly what I expected based on what I saw on the manufacturer's web site.
 
 
Test Number    2
Date Of Test:  May 24 & 25, 2001
Location:      Framingham, Massachusetts
 
Impressions and Concerns
 
My first impression was that the pad was very light and similar to a standard blue foam sleeping pad except that one side is molded in an egg crate configuration. Due to its size, I was concerned about it's packability and due to it's material, I was also concerned about it's durability.
 
Home Testing
 
Since I only received this yesterday with a trip planned for today, I could only do some brief testing and comparisons. I compared it to two similar pads, the 3/4 length Ridge Rest and 3/4 length Z-Rest in the categories outlined below.
 
Packability:
 
I found that the slightly longer Mt. Washington pad was a bit less packable than both the Ridge Rest and Z-Rest and it took up the most room in all categories - rolled up tight, folded flat as a an internal pack frame, folded in a "C" as an internal pack frame and also as as cylindrical internal pack frame (Z-Rest excluded from the test).
 
           1  2  3
Rolled:    ZR RR MW
Folded:    ZR RR MW
Cylinder:  RR MW
"C" Shape: ZR RR MW
 
Sleeping Comfort:
 
I tested the sleeping comfort of all three pads on the hardwood floor of my apartment. Like other testers, I felt that the Mt. Washington was noticeably more comfortable with the egg crate side down. The pad was significantly longer than both the Z-Rest and the Ridge Rest.
 
The Z-rest was the most comfortable of the three pads with the Mt. Washington pad winning in the other categories. The Z-Rest and Ridge Rest felt clammy in the New England humidity while the Mt. Washington pad was not - particularly with the egg crate side facing up. The Mt. Washington pad had the most friction of the three pads.
 
                        1  2  3
Comfort:                ZR RR MW
Humidity:               MW ZR RR
Floor Friction:         MW ZR RR
Sleeping Bag Friction:  MW RR ZR
 
ThermaRestr Chair:
 
I tried all 3 pads in a ThermaRestr chair and found it to be the most comfortable of the three pads and having a better fit and more easily stuffed than the Ridge Rest but the Ridge Rest was the more laterally stable of the three. The Z-Rest was the easiest to fit into the chair.
 
           1  2  3
Comfort:   MW ZR RR
Stability: RR MW ZR
Fit:       ZR MW RR
 
Test Strategy
 
I plan to test the Mt. Washington pad in the White Mountains in New Hampshire from over the next three and a half days. I will use it on the ground and in a Hennessey Hammock. I do not intend to use it in a shelter or on a tent platform on this particular trip. I will also use it in a ThermaRester chair. The first obstacle will be to find a place to put it on my pack.
 
Note:
 
I had a difficult time getting the pad to fit both inside and outside a 45 liter pack - the Kelty Vapor 45. It takes up quite a bit of room - maybe 1/3+ of the internal volume of the pack. Outside, I could not get it to fit under my rain cover when strapped horizontally to the bottom and I'm expecting 4 days of rain during the field test.
 
I cannot lash it vertically without interfering with the single vertical lid tie down on the Vapor. So, if it rains, I will have lash it in a garbage bag somehow outside of the rain cover like a rookie. If I owned it, I would've cut 10-12" off of it to make it more useable and packable. I could have used my larger pack - Dana Teraplane, but I could not justify using a 6.5 lb pack just to carry a 7.7 oz sleeping pad. The remainder of my gear on this trip weighs just over 13 lbs so I thought I could easily fit the pad inside my pack but I can't without trimming the pad.
 


Read more reviews of High Country gear

Reviews > Sleep Gear > Pads and Air Mattresses > Mt. Washington Foam Pad > Gerry Gladu > 1st and 2nd Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson