![]() |
| Home | Guest - Not logged in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
» Register
» Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
» Contact
|
Reviews > Sleep Gear > Sleeping Bags > Sierra Designs Arrow Rock Bag > Test Report by Michael WheilerSIERRA DESIGNS ARROW ROCK 30
SLEEPING BAG TEST SERIES REPORT By Michael Wheiler Initial Report: May 31, 2008
Field Report: August 26, 2008 Long Term Report: Not Yet Available INITIAL REPORT
(May 31, 2008)
Product Specifications For the Arrow Rock 30 Per Sierra Designs Unless Otherwise Noted:
Product Features of the Arrow Rock 30 Per Sierra Designs:
Manufacturer's Warranty: "Sierra Designs guarantees that the materials and workmanship in every product we make will stand up to the use for which it was designed. This warranty does not cover damages caused by improper care, accidents or the natural breakdown of materials over extended use and time. All defective or damaged products should be returned to us for evaluation and will be repaired or replaced at our discretion. Damages due to accident or improper care will be repaired at a reasonable rate. Products sent for repair must be cleaned prior to sending." TESTER'S INITIAL OBSERVATIONS: The box containing the Arrow Rock arrived late in the afternoon on May 23, 2008 carefully packaged and in excellent shape. Although the box was addressed to me, the sleeping bag was a size large (I requested a size regular) and the shipping invoice was addressed to Ryan Christensen. Ryan and I live in the same town and got together that evening to exchange bags. The Arrow Rock looked like what I expected after viewing the manufacturer's website. After a quick examination to make sure the sleeping bag was undamaged, I looked for a hang-tag or some other information from Sierra Designs regarding the bag but found only two small white tags attached to the foot box. One tag contained the style name, SKU number, and a reference that this was a "sales sample:2008." The second tag contained information regarding the flammability of the sleeping bag materials with a warning that the bag was not flame resistant and should be kept away from "open flame and heat source!" I then began my examination of the bag beginning with the hood. There is also an insulated draft tube that runs the entire length of the zipper. The draft tube is approximately 3.5 "/9 cm in width. Sierra Designs also installed what it refers to as "snag free zipper tracks." The zipper tracks appear to be made of nylon webbing doubled over with some sort of cord in between. The zipper tracks are approximately 0.5"/1.3 cm in width and run the entire length of the zipper. The zipper tracks are located under each side of the zipper track so as to keep the zipper away from the bag material. While inspecting the bag and crawling inside, I used the zipper several times and so far, the zipper tracks have provided me with snag free zipping. The Arrow Rock 30 is one of the bags offered by Sierra Designs with full Flex technology. As noted above, the Flex technology consists of "technically advanced elastic binding tape" and up to 8"/20 cm of expandable baffles. According to research done by Sierra Designs, restrictive bags are "the number one reason why people sleep restlessly in the backcountry." The Flex technology allows the bag to move with the user and adapt to the user's shape for thermal efficiency. According to Sierra Designs, "You will not find a more comfortable, thermally efficient bag anywhere...period." The Arrow Rock 30 is a mummy style sleeping bag which tapers from approximately 26 "/66 cm at the widest point in the shoulder area to approximately 15"/38 cm at the narrowest point in the foot box. When I crawled into the bag, I found that the bag fit my 5'10"/178 cm frame comfortably but I was able to easily touch the end of the foot box with my toes. Not unexpectedly (due to the mummy style), the Arrow Rock 30 was comfortably snug in the shoulder area but I was able to roll to my left and right side and from my back to my stomach without feeling that the bag was binding or restricting my movement. The hood fit snugly but comfortably around my head. I was able to adjust the opening by pulling on the elastic draw cord and moving the plastic cord lock but it required the use of both hands. When I closed the hood, the opening closed around my head but the design left my mouth and part of my face uncovered. This was not unexpected for a summer weight bag. The hook and loop closure was easy to use even with just one hand. On the right-hand side of the exterior of the bag near the hood's draw cord is a small zippered pocket. The pocket is sort of an oblong shape. At the longest and widest points, the interior of the pocket is approximately 9"/23 cm long and 4"/10 cm wide. My backpacking flashlight fit easily into the pocket. Though I wouldn't likely put these items in the pocket, to give you an idea of its size, I was also able to store each of the following items separately in the pocket: a Garmin Vista GPS, my cell phone, and my pocket knife. The hood draw cord and the exterior zippered pocket. I then turned the bag over and examined the integrated Pad Locks. The Pad Locks are designed to help keep the sleeping pad in place under the sleeping bag. There are two Pad Locks located approximately 22.5"/57 cm apart near the middle of the bottom of the sleeping bag. Each Pad Lock is made up of two strips of narrow orange nylon webbing with one strip sewn into the seams on each side of the bottom of the bag. The two strips are attached by a black plastic adjustable buckle. The Pad Locks are not removable. I am curious as to how the Pad Locks work in conjunction with the Flex technology. My primary question is, "Does securing the sleeping bag to a rigid sleeping pad interfere with the Flex technology's intended purpose of allowing the bag to move with the user?" The Arrow Rock came stowed in a large cotton storage sack with the company name, logo, the name of the bag, size of the bag, the fill material and temperature rating on the bottom. Inside the sleeping bag was a black stuff sack with a draw cord and plastic cord lock. Sewn into the bottom of the stuff sack is a handle made of nylon material which also sports the company name and logo. The Arrow Rock compacts nicely into the stuff sack and I believe it would compress even smaller if placed into a compression sack. The photographs below show the Arrow Rock 30 in the stuff sack as compared to a 34 fl oz/1 liter Nalgene water bottle. The Arrow Rock 30 in the stuff sack provided by Sierra Designs. The Arrow Rock 30 in the stuff sack provided by Sierra Designs. Instructions
for cleaning the Arrow Rock 30 were found on the Sierra Designs web
page but were also provided on a cloth tag sewn inside the bag on the
draft tube near the top of the zipper. According to the
instructions, the bag can be professionally cleaned by a cleaner with
experience in cleaning down items and who will guarantee the
work. Sierra Designs warns that solvents used in dry cleaning can
strip the natural oils in the down that help it retain its
loft. The bag can also be washed at home. According
to Sierra Designs, the bag should be
washed in a front loading, tumble washer not a top loading
washer. Machine wash on the gentle cycle in cool water with a
mild soap. Detergents
specifically designed for sleeping bags are recommended. Rinse
very thoroughly to remove all soap residue. Drip dry or tumble
dry at a low heat setting. Check the bag frequently during the
drying
process. Sierra Designs also recommends throwing a couple of
tennis balls in the dryer with the bag to help separate the down.
Do not steam, press or iron the bag. The
company suggests storing the bag loosely in a storage sack or hanging
in a cool, dry place.
Summary: FIELD
REPORT
August 26, 2008 Test Locations
and Conditions.
During the Field Test period, I used the Arrow Rock a total of ten nights. On June 20-21, 2008 I camped overnight
near Mt. Bell (elevation 11,612 ft/3,539 m) in the Lemhi Mountain Range
near Howe, Idaho. The temperature overnight was 32 F/0 C.
I slept in a Lighthouse tent. I used a Therm-a-Rest ProLite 4 pad
which I attached to the bag with the Pad Locks. I ate a good meal
fairly early and we retired to bed before it was
dark outside. I wore only light cotton underwear to bed.
Unless I am really tired, even when sleeping in a bed at home, I tend
to turn over frequently. Although I recall having a fairly
comfortable and restful night's sleep, my climbing partner
claimed that during the night I was thrashing around and he asked me if
I was "ok." He claims that I said, "No, I'm cold." However,
I do not recall such a
conversation and I believe he was delusional. He forgot his
sleeping bag and was sleeping in his clothes, my coat and a bivy
bag. I tend to think he was really the one who was cold. I
remember being comfortably warm all night despite the fact that the
temperature dropped to near the lowest rating for the Arrow Rock.
The only difficulty I encountered was zipping the Arrow Rock up past my
shoulders. The zipper seemed to stick at that location and it was
hard to zip the bag past my shoulders. Once I got the zipper past
my shoulders, it was easy to zip the bag up the rest of the way.
On June 23-24, 2008, I stayed at
Treasure
Mountain near Driggs, Idaho (elevation 6,300 ft/1,920 m). The
Temperature overnight was 41 F/5
C. I again slept in a Lighthouse tent. On this outing, I
used a Therm-a-Rest CampLite pad which is a bit wider and longer than
the ProLite 4. It is also rectangular in shape rather than
tapered like the ProLite 4. I used
the Pad Locks to secure the pad to the bag. I ate my evening meal
at around 6:00 p.m. I wore only light cotton underwear
to bed. The temperature was warm enough that I slept with the bag
partially unzipped most of the night. Once again, I found it
difficult to get the zipper on the bag past my shoulders. It
almost felt like my shoulders were producing too much tension on the
bag at this point in the zipper. Once I got the zipper "over the
hill" created by my shoulders, it zipped easily. During the night
I also discovered that rolling from one side to the other was a bit
constricted. The bag clung tightly to the pad and provided very
little give when I was attempting to roll from side to side. I
later discovered that loosening the Pad Locks a little created less
tension between the bag and the pad and I was able to roll over much
easier.
I next spent three nights, from July 2 to July 5, 2008, at Stanley Lake near Stanley, Idaho (elevation 6,537 ft/1,992 m). The overnight temperatures ranged from 42 F/6 C to 51 F/11 C. On this outing, I used a Big Agnes pad and the Sleeping Giant Pad Upgrade kit. This kit is also rectangularly shaped and a bit thicker than the other two pads I had previously used. I used the Pad Locks to secure the pad to the bag. I ate very well every night. I slept in light cotton underwear and cotton pj bottoms. One night just at bed time, we experienced a thunderstorm with rain and severe wind. The wind was so severe that it blew down trees in neighboring campsites. Fortunately none fell in our campsite. Each night, I slept very well and awoke rested and ready to face a new day. The temperatures on this outing never really challenged the Arrow Rock's temperature rating. I usually started the evening with the zipper only partially done up to allow for cooler air to circulate inside the bag. By early morning, I always zipped up the bag and always had at least a little difficulty getting the zipper past my shoulders. I spent one night (July 18, 2008) near Henry's Lake near Island Park, Idaho (elevation 6,470 ft/1,972 m). This was a youth activity that I was helping to supervise and so I ended up sleeping in a cabin on top of a bed. I opened the window next to the bed which allowed a very cool breeze to circulate over my bed. The outside temperature overnight was 46 F/8 C. I ate a very good meal that night. I wore only light cotton underwear and cotton pj bottoms to bed. Surprisingly, given the outside temperature, I was very comfortable all night and slept very well. The cool breeze blew throughout the night which helped keep me from overheating. On July 23-25, 2008, I spent two nights at Earley Park near Tremonton, Utah (elevation 5,766 ft/1,757 m). The overnight temperatures were in the low 50s F/10-11 C. I slept in a Kelty 6-man tent. I used a Big Agnes pad and Sleeping Giant Pad Upgrade kit. As an experiment, I did not use the Pad Locks one night. Again, I ate very well every night. I wore cotton underwear and cotton pj bottoms to bed. As has been my practice for most of the summer, I started the night with the bag only partially zipped but by early morning zipped the bag the rest of the way. I still had the same difficulty with the zipper as previously mentioned. I was comfortable both nights but the bag slipped off the pad frequently during the night that I failed to use the Pad Locks. The shell material is silky to the touch and seemed to slip off the pad with ease. I will attach the Arrow Rock to the sleeping pad by way of the Pad Locks from now on. Finally, on August 4-6, 2008, I used the Arrow Rock for two nights during a backpacking trip into Copper Basin near MacKay, Idaho. We spent one night at Moose Lake (elevation 9,345 ft/2,848 m) and one night in Surprise Canyon near the base of Standhope Peak (elevation 10,148 ft/3,093 m). I used my Lighthouse tent. Performance in the Field. While I have found one or two loose feathers inside the tent or on the bag itself after a night's use, feather loss has not been significant. I found no shifting of the insulation in the Arrow Rock. To this point in time, there are no signs of wear or tear on the bag. The zipper worked smoothly with very little snagging but it does hang up in the area of my shoulders. I think the tension on the zipper at that location is a bit much and therefore it becomes a bit difficult to zip the bag at that location. Once I have gotten the zipper past that point, it zips easily. As long as I did not overly tighten the bag to the pad with the Pad Locks, the Arrow Rock was roomy enough to allow me to flop around, switching from side to back to side to front, etc. without difficulty. With the exception of it being a little tight in the shoulder area when fully zipped, the Arrow Rock is comfortable. The Pad Locks kept various pads in place. This is a very nice design feature. In the past, with other sleeping bag/pad combinations, I have frequently awakened to find my bag and pad had separated. So far, the temperature rating has been pretty accurate for me. I used the bag once in temperatures close to the lower limits of the Arrow Rock and did not feel cold. However, I have not yet really tested the temperature rating but hope to do so in the future. The Arrow Rock also has the ability to regain loft after being compressed. Although it has not yet really been a problem due to the summer temperatures, I can feel body heat escaping out the top of the Arrow Rock. There is no draft collar to prevent heat loss and, at this point, I am wondering how this will affect my use of the Arrow Rock in temperatures closer to 30 F/-1 C or a bit lower. I have not really used the zippered pocket near the hood of the Arrow Rock. It will hold small items but I usually don't have anything I need to stow near my face overnight. If I still wore contact lenses, I would store my contact case in this pocket. Summary: Likes and Dislikes. Likes so far:
I will continue to monitor the durability of the Arrow Rock 30 and its temperature rating especially as the temperatures start to drop now that fall is approaching. This concludes my Field Report on the Arrow Rock 30. A report about my continuing experiences with the Arrow Rock 30 in the field will be appended to this report in late October 2008. Please check back then for more information. I wish to thank Sierra Designs and BackpackGearTest for giving me the opportunity to test the Arrow Rock 30 sleeping bag. Read more reviews of Sierra Designs gear Read more gear reviews by Michael Wheiler Reviews > Sleep Gear > Sleeping Bags > Sierra Designs Arrow Rock Bag > Test Report by Michael Wheiler | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||