| |
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
|
|
Tubbs Pinnacle Snowshoes
Long Term Report
|
|
Name: |
Cora Shea |
|
Background:
I began backpacking in 1997. I love backpacking in spring
and winter snow more than anything, especially on skis. My pack
weight ranges from 15 to 90 lbs (7 to 40 kg), and I vary sleeping in a
tarp, tent, quinzhee, snowcave, bolt-hole, bivy, people-pile, or
straight under the stars. I spend a lot of my time outdoors, and I
prioritize gear durability and functionality above weight.
|
|
Age: |
24 |
|
Gender: |
Female |
|
Height: |
5 ft 9 in (1.75 m) |
|
Weight: |
150 lb (70 kg) |
|
Email address: |
cahhmc at yahoo dot com |
|
Location: |
Los Angeles, California, USA |
|
Date: |
December 30, 2004 |
|
Basic Product Information
|
|
Manufacturer: Tubbs Snowshoes, $239
|
Year of Manufacture: 2004
|
URL: http://www.tubbssnowshoes.com/
|
|
Listed weight: 4 lb (1.8 kg)
|
Weight as delivered: 2 lb 3 oz (1 kg) per snowshoe,
4 lb 6 oz per pair
|
Size: Pinnacle 25, supporting 120-200 lb (54-91 kg)
|
| |
|
The Pinnacles are snowshoes with ArcTec decking material (puncture resistant to
-40 F/-40 C) supported by an Easton 7075-T7 Aluminum frame. They measure 8 x
25 in (20 x 64 cm), and support my feet using a Bear Hug binding. The Bear Hug
consists of two plastic flaps which come up on the sides of the foot, one
adjustable strap over the flaps, and one strap on the heel.
This report covers long term use, care, and maintenance from April 2004 through
December 2004. For field testing performed during April to June, 2004, please
see my
Field
Report.
For more general product information, more visual details,
more reporting on appearance, structure, and items that can be tested and
commented on without field testing, please see my
Initial
Report.
|
|
I continued to use the snowshoes into the spring last season, and briefly had a
few day opportunities to use them this season. Their flotation continues to be
spot-on. My forward stride with them feels very balanced and natural, and the
binding rotates evenly and freely.
The terrain I took the Pinnacles into was
mostly mountainous, and involved late and early season hard snow as well as
warm and mid-season soft snow. Temperatures hovered right around freezing on
all trips, and the Pinnacles did not see temperatures above 50 F (10 C) after
the Field Report.
The decking and cleats are superb. The decking sheds snow like it is liquid
water, and the cleats have excellent grip. I used the Pinnacles mostly in hard
snow for their grip, and was never disappointed. The one place I had trouble
was during traversing because the decking tended to not tilt enough to get
purchase with the cleats, but this was not a problem with the cleats
themselves.
When in powder snow, the Pinnacles also performed well. I have had limited
snowshoe experience before (I mostly travel on skis) and the other snowshoes I
have used feel much softer and more adaptable to changing terrain. The
Pinnacles felt dependably stiff, which was nice and natural feeling on hard
snow for purchase, and sometimes wobbly on variable terrain in soft snow.
I never understand weight ratings for snowshoes. For the Pinnacles, I consider
the weight rating to be accurate for up to about a layer of foot (0.3 m) deep
maritime soft snow with a loaded pack. (For me, this is about 200 lb / 91 kg.)
With powder snow any deeper, I sink enough to call it 'wallowing', and desire a
snowshoe with more flotation. I feel that the snowshoe rating that Tubbs lists
(just the weight range) is not enough to give the full picture. In other
words, in five feet of powder, will they still float 200 lbs (91 kg)? Of
course not. Here, I would give a 'full picture' rating for the Pinnacle 25
snowshoes as 120-200 lb (54-91 kg) for 0-1 ft (0-0.3 m) powder.
Overall, my biggest problem with the Pinnacles continued to be the bindings.
First, I realized that I had not tried soft boots with the snowshoes, and had
only used my big hard snow and ice plastic and leather boots. With soft shoes,
I had to cinch the single strap on the Bear Hug so tightly that it pinched my
feet such that they hurt! And my shoes still kept sliding around because the
binding sides and straps were too soft to conform to lightweight hiking boots
or tennis shoes. Thank goodness I was only trying it on a short trip.
Also, the boots and shoes must match the angle of the sides of the Bear
Hug to fit well. I used some larger, moderately stiff boots with large toes
and narrow heels. The heels would always slide around because the one strap
would tighten the flaps around the toe, but tons of air would be around the
heel. With other snowshoes with multiple top straps, I have been more likely
to get a better fit over my range of boots. Oh well.
One other little nitpick I had was their packability. After a while, I got the
sides of the Bear Hug binding all flattened out and worn in so they packed a
little flatter, but I think having to wear in (or, wear out) a binding in order
for the snowshoes to pack well is silly.
But as long as my boots fit, and I had the patience to strap them in with the
fiddly adjustment and locking mechanism (which is difficult to adjust to a new
set of boots in the field with gloves on -- I learned to do it at home
beforehand if possible) then the Pinnacles were great. My favorite part is
certainly their great cleat design which works very well.
|
|
Care and Maintenance:
Overall, the Pinnacles have needed no maintenance. I shake them out and let
them dry after each trip, and any dirt just shakes right off. The cleats are
clean and shiny and sharp still, even after walking a good bit over rocky parts
of snow. The rotation of the foot and binding is not as smooth as it once was,
but with my other snowshoes some sewing machine oil solves that issue, so I am
not too worried about the binding gumming up in the future. I consider it to
be a natural part of snowshoeing.
Durability:
The Pinnacles have been quite durable. The foam around the Bear Hug is still
intact, much to my surprise. I have always carefully packed the bindings in
toward my pack to protect them when bushwhacking, however. The decking has a
number of scratches from endless bushwhacking (including a lot of over-my-head
willow groves) on my way to late-season snow approaches. But
functionally, the Pinnacles are very much intact and performing well after a
great deal of abuse.
|
|
Overall, the Pinnacles are very nice snowshoes with grippy cleats and decent
flotation. However, this is only true as long as the binding fits the shoes I
am wearing. Some pairs of shoes get squashed, some have the heel slide around,
and some fit just fine. The Pinnacles performed best on harder snow when the
cleats were needed along with some flotation.
|
Likes
|
Dislikes
|
|
Natural, easy stride
|
Binding squashes soft shoes
|
|
Solid decking
|
Difficult to pack
|
|
Sharp, dependable, and grippy cleats
|
Binding is very fiddly and grips inconsistently on
differently shaped boots
|
|
Read more reviews of Tubbs gear
Read more gear reviews by Cora Hussey
|