Guest - Not logged in 

Reviews > Snow Gear > Traction Aids > 32North STABILicers Lite > Test Report by John Waters

Test Series Report:
STABILicers Lite Traction Device

July 9, 2007

Biographical Information
Product Information
Description and First Impressions - February 23, 2007
Field Report - May 7, 2007
Long Term Report - July 9, 2007

Tester's Biographical Information    <back to top>

Name: John R. Waters
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Height: 5 ft 9 in (1.7 m)
Weight: 178 lb (81 kg)
Boot Size: 10 US
Email Address: exec at bysky dot com
City, State, Country: White Lake, Michigan USA

Backpacking Background

My backpacking began in 1999. I've hiked rainforests in Hawaii, Costa Rica, and Puerto Rico, on glaciers in New Zealand and Iceland, 14ers in Colorado and Death Valley's deserts. I hike or snowshoe 6-8 miles (10 km-13 km) 2-3 times weekly in Pontiac Lake Recreation Area, with other day-long hikes on various SE Michigan trails. I also hike in Colorado and am relocating there, which will increase my hiking time and trail variety tremendously.

My daypack is 18 lb (8 kg); overnights' weigh over 25 lb (11 kg). I'm aiming to reduce my weight load by 40% or more.

Product Information (from manufacturer's website, including picture)    <back to top>

Manufacturer: 32 North
Style: STABILicers Lite
Year of Manufacture: 2007
Weight: N/A
Colors: Black
Sizes: Small Medium LargeX-Large

MSRP: $21.95 USD
Guarantee or Warranty: N/A

STABILicers Lite

Features: "Full foot slip protection with heel and forefoot cleats maintains traction throughout your natural stride while walking. Lightweight TPE Elastomer holds STABILicers Lite securely in place. Traction tread outsole and cleats simultaneously contact walking surface, providing superior grip on ice, snow, rock, and pavement. Multidirectional, case-hardened non-replaceable cleats bite into ice and snow."

Product Information (from tester)

Color: Black
Size: Medium
Weight: 11 oz (312 g) per pair

Description and First Impressions    <back to top>
February 23, 2007


The STABILicers Lite is made of elastomer which looks like black rubber. It's designed to be pulled over the nose of shoes and boots, extend underneath and then over the heel. It's best to think of the STABILicers Lite structure as a base area that goes under the sole of the shoe or boot and a top ring of rubber about 3/8 of an inch (2 cm) that is connected to the base layer by vertical ribs that vary in width from 3/8 to inch (2-1.3 cm). This structure is very stretchable so it fits over a range of shoe sizes in each of the small, medium, large and x-large sizes offered. The nose of the STABILicers Lite provides about 1.5 inches (4 cm) of height to grip over the toe and this front part is comprised of one inch (1.3 cm) strip. There is another vertical support on each side of the toe 1 inches (3 cm) away from the front toe support. Then there are two supports on each side of the toe-bed, one on each side in the middle, two at the back quarter section over the heel. The rear has an additional middle horizontal support that wraps around the heel 180 degrees. The length of the STABILicers Lite stretched out is 9 inches (23 cm) long. It's shaped in the form of a shoe sole. I was able to grab the top ring and stretch it out to approximately 15 inches (38 cm).

Looking at the bottom of the STABILicers Lite, there are three rectangular hard rubber sections molded to the sole. These are approximately 1 inches by 2 inches (3 cm by 6 cm) on each side and are approximately inch (.6 cm) high and are placed so that the long dimension goes side to side. Each section has 8 cleats in two perpendicular rows, with one row being slightly curved and the other straight from side to side. There are also three 3/8 inch (2 cm) round rubber pylons to the sides of the middle section and each area has what can best be described as a wedge of rubber to its side that sticks up as high as the cleats. Two of these sections are under the front area of the sole from the toe to the insole and one is under the heel. There are also fancy embossings on the vertical members that look like boomerangs.

The material is a dull black rubber much like what is seen on an automobile tire and has a mottled sheen.

First Impressions

This should be interesting. I received a MEDIUM pair of STABILicers Lite which according to the 32 North website is supposed to fit up to a size 10 US boot. When positioned over the toe of my running shoes or boots, before they are stretched over the heel, the STABILicers Lite lay just ahead of the heel on both shoes (less then 2/3 of the way to the back of the heel). That means that they are being stretched about 50% to fit behind the heel. That's a lot of stretching and it appears to really be putting a lot of stress on the sides of the units. Since I am a size 10 and that was the top of the medium range, I would figure that there would be some extra play, but now I'm wondering if I should have gotten a large and if the large would not stretch so much. I reasoned that since the manufacturer skipped from a 10 at the high end of a size medium to a 10 in the large size, there might be too much play for my size 10 if I ordered a large. Now, I'm thinking maybe not.

Anyway, my first attempts at getting these on my boots make me worry about the STABILicers Lite's durability. I cannot get the rear bottom (sole) square platform with the lugs to be parallel to the sides of either boot. It wants to be at a 45 degree angle. I will have to see if that is an issue in performance. It's just annoying for me as an engineer to not have things line up properly. The front bottom section lines up okay, it's just the back section because of the way the sides grip the front half of the shoe, which is not linear along the sides.

I am also surprised about how far out the sides of the STABILicers Lite stick out. They are a good inch (1 cm) away from the shoe or boot at the middle where my shoes curve in at the insole. This very much creates an area that can catch on branches and rocks, and I wonder if possibly they will pull right off my feet as I hike. Not to mention that I can twang them if I get bored, but I will be looking to see if they'll break right off if they get caught on anything since they are stretched so far with so much tension.

Field Report    <back to top>
Updated May 7, 2007

When I first considered testing the STABILicers, I was in Colorado in January and February hiking through rugged rocky terrain about 4 to 6 mi (6-10 km) each day just to get back and forth to our tower sites. I was using another brand of over-the-shoe ice studs that got an extensive workout on rocks covered in solid glossy ice. By the time I received the STABILicers for testing it was almost March and most of the really good ice was gone. There was snow, but it wasn't cold enough for a long enough period to test these the way I could have if I had them in the middle of winter, especially under the conditions I needed them for this past winter. The snow in winter here melts in the bright sun then freezes at night to sheets of ice and then continues that cycle for days to make some nice ice covered terrain. In the spring there could be a 5 in (13 cm) snow fall even at 10,000 ft (3048 m), but the temperature doesn't stay below freezing, so the sun melts the snow and just mud remains.

That being said, I was able to test the STABILicers on snow and solid packed snow that was icy, but nothing like the sheer solid ice of winter. I'm hoping that I can provide an extended report addendum for the winter of 2007-2008 so I can get that slippery glass-like ice that these need to be tested on.

I used my Asolo boots for the latest test on a 5 mi (8 km) hike southwest of Westcliffe, Colorado on Easter Sunday 2007. The trailhead starts at the end of CR-140 at 9,050 ft (2758 m) and runs for 2.5 mi (4 km) through timber and aspen up to Venable Falls at about 10,700 ft (3261 m). That's a 1,700 ft (518 m) rise in 2 mi (3 km). The temperature was 47 F (8 C) and it was drizzling rain and misty so that ice was forming on everything and coating the trees. On the way to this trail, passing through the San Louis range, the trees were coated with ice crystals creating a beautiful wonderland of ice, but it was warm enough that there was no ice on the ground. So I had to drive farther into the Sangre de Cristo range to get snow. Sure do wish I had these earlier in the year (I promise to not whine about that any more ... I'm done.)

When I hike alone, I always have a pretty full daypack with snacks, water, headlamp, etc. and I always carry a hunting knife, camera, GPS. I had a lot of stuff for a short hike like this, but in foul weather it's nice to be prepared. My point is that aside from the rain gear and wind jacket and stuff I was wearing (the wind was whipping up to 45 mph (72 km/h)), I was carrying probably another 20 lb (9 kg) in my backpack. Of course I always use hiking poles, too.

So now the trick is to get the STABILicers on my boots. It's raining. I'm at the trailhead. I can't put the STABILicers on in the car because there isn't enough room to move around. So one way is to sit with the driver side door open and my legs facing out of the car. But as soon as I step out of the car, my boots get muddy and I'm getting wet. I cross my legs to get the left STABILicer on and now mud is all over my pants leg. I put the STABILicer on but it's crooked and needs a lot of adjusting to get straight and I need to do a lot of wiggling to get at both sides of the boot to make those adjustments. After about 10 minutes of struggling, and a few launchings of the STABILicers into the mud I finally get them on both boots. I'm wet and muddy though and my hands are coated in mud. So I had to grab a towel to clean off. I haven't even left the car yet and I already got a workout. By the way, when I put these on my shoes or boots, when the back end doesn't securely go over the heel, it can be launched several feet away. These things can travel pretty far.

Picture 8883
Picture 8883

So now I'm ready to get out of the car, get my gear together and get on the trail. Picture 8883 (above) shows the trail. Yes, it just keeps going up. The snow is packed solid and is icy and very slippery in spots.

I'd like to point out in Picture 8884 and 8885 that the sides of the STABILicers are a half inch or more away from the side of my boots. Although I was initially concerned that in brush this would cause sticks, grass, weeds, etc. to get between my boot and the STABILicer and pull it away from my boot, or perhaps even cause me to trip, I didn't have any issues with this that I can point to. I need to test this more in terrain with low brush, like the trails I was on in January and February where I could have really tested them well (I promised not to bring this up again didn't I?)

Picture 8884
Picture 8884


Picture 8885
Picture 8885


Picture 8886
Picture 8886

Picture 8886 shows how they come up and over the toe of my boots, and then up and over the heel. As can be seen, it was quite muddy when I put these on at the trailhead.

After about 1/2 mi (0.8 km) on the trail I lost the left unit. I figured out a few hundred feet down the trail and had to go back. Picture 8889 (below) shows the wayward STABILicer where I found it. My guess is that it didn't like the hole in the ice just to the rear of the heel. The print from the right unit can be seen next to it. So now my hike has turned from enjoying the scenery to looking down constantly to make sure the STABILicers are still on my feet. I don't want to hike back a long distance to find these things, especially since they are black and don't stand out well.

Picture 8891 (below) shows how deep the packed snow is as I stand next to a boot print that was frozen in time.

Picture 8889
Picture 8889
Picture 8891
Picture 8891

I know these are STABILicers but parts of the trail turned to slippery mud. Really slippery mud. Super slippery mud. So when going along a trail covered in icy snow and coming around a bend, I have no desire to remove my STABILicers for a 100 ft (30 m) trek through mud to only have to wrestle with putting them on again later, especially since there is no place to sit. So I left them on through muddy patches. I have to admit they seem to make it easier to get across muddy areas, but they do come off easier. And when they do come off in mud, the fun begins.

Picture 8893
Picture 8893

Picture 8893 shows the departed STABILicer after it came off in the muddy section. 8894 and 8895 (both below) show me trying to get those slippery, muddy STABILicers back on my boots. It was not an enjoyable feat (no .. not happy feet at all). They were slippery and very muddy. So as you can see in 8895, my hands are coated in mud. I have mud all over my sleeve and, when the unit slipped off my boot and slingshot a few feet away, it sprayed mud all over my face. Of course, this takes a lot of energy and really good balance, so the only way to do this when I am alone, under any conditions, is to either sit on the ground or a rock or log, or lean up against a tree. I chose the latter since there where no rocks or logs to sit on. Quite an exercise. It took over 10 minutes to get that one unit back on my boot. It must have come off a few dozen times as I was putting it on because it was so slippery it would not grab onto the boot.

Picture 8894
Picture 8894
Picture 8895
Picture 8895

I got them back on, watched my feet carefully at the expense of sightseeing and only lost one off each foot another 3 times along the way, mostly in the mud.

Under these conditions, I'm not sure what the benefit was of using them. I spent more time keeping an eye on them and fixing them then if I had just not had them. However, these are not the optimum conditions for their use and I would really have been able to test them very well if I had them in January and February (I said that already, didn't I?)

My observation is that these need to be tried on in the store over the exact model of boots or shoes that will be worn. I think that the mediums I received may be stretched a little too far over my 10 1/2 Asolos, but I don't know if the large size would be too loose. They definitely provide extra traction on ice and packed snow and even on slippery mud. I would feel so much more comfortable wearing these if there was a buckle or strap that kept them locked to my boots. I also think each set should come with Handi-wipes. I was wiping my hands on tree leaves and my pants frequently.

Long Term Report    <back to top>
Updated July 9, 2007

Due to unseasonably dry weather during the Long Term Report stage of my testing, I was not able to use the STABILicers for any additional testing after my above posted Field Report. I continued to carry them in my backpack on all outings, hoping for a hint of snow and or ice, but no luck. Carrying these babies is no big deal since they take up almost no room in my pack and certainly don't add much weight (11 oz/312 g).

While this concludes my testing of the STABILicers Lite traction device. I intend to continue using the STABILicers during the upcoming 2007-2008 winter season and will post an addendum at the end of that season.

Please check back then (approximately end of March 2008) for those results. Thank you to 32 North and for the opportunity to test the STABILicers Lite traction device.

John R. Waters

Read more reviews of 32North gear
Read more gear reviews by John Waters

Reviews > Snow Gear > Traction Aids > 32North STABILicers Lite > Test Report by John Waters

Product tested and reviewed in each Formal Test Report has been provided free of charge by the manufacturer to Upon completion of the Test Series the writer is permitted to keep the product. Owner Reviews are based on product owned by the reviewer personally unless otherwise noted.

All material on this site is the exclusive property of
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson