BackpackGearTest
Google
Web BackpackGearTest.org
  Home Guest - Not logged in 
 
 » Register
 » Login
Gear Reviews
Documents
Tools
 » Contact

Reviews > Trekking Poles > Poles > MSR OverLand Carbon > Andrew Priest > Field Report

MOUNTAIN SAFETY RESEARCH (MSR) OVERLAND CARBON TELESCOPIC POLES

MSR Overland Carbon Telescopic Poles

Field Report
August 17, 2004

Table of Contents


Andrew Priest, Tester and Author of this Report
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
aushiker@yahoo.com.au

I am a 44 year old male, 180 cm (5' 11") in height and I weigh 100 kg (220 lbs).  I have been hiking in Western Australia for approximately five years. For the past four years I have been regularly walking and now leading walks with the Perth Bushwalkers Club. These bushwalks range from all on-track to all off-track pack-carries. I consider myself as moving towards being a lightweight tent-carrying bushwalker with my pack base weight in the 8 to 12 kg (18 to 26 lb) range.  In 2003 I completed my End to End of the Bibbulmun Track. I have also end to ended the Cape to Cape Track and the Coastal Plains Walk Track.

[Click here to return to the top]

Information about the MSR OverLand Carbon Telescopic Poles

Description, year of manufacturer and MSRP: The OverLand Carbon trekking poles were manufactured by Mountain Safety Research (MSR) during 2004 in Austria. At the time of writing their MSRP is US$129.95. I initially assumed that this was for a pair of poles, but I now believe that this is the single pole price. I would find it helpful if this was clearer on the MSR website   The OverLand Carbons are described by MSR as being lightweight, "full carbon-fiber construction" trekking poles.  They are three-piece telescoping poles which utilise an expander locking system [LockJaw] to lock the sections in place.  They are not anti-shock style poles, but do have what MSR describe as "anti-shock" wrist straps.


Weights and measurements. MSR weights for each pole are 241 g (8.5 oz) (482 g (17 oz) per set) whereas my weight for each pole including basket as measured by my Arlec kitchen digital scales are 234 g (8.25 oz) (468 g (16.50 oz) per set).   MSR's stated length of the poles is 65 -140 cm or  25 - 55 in.  My measurements are from 66.5 cm (26 in) fully collapsed to 144 cm (57 in) fully extended. Fully extended is where each section is extended to its specified maximum length, 140 on the pole numbering system.

[Click here to return to the top]

My Experience Using the MSR OverLand Carbon Telescopic Poles in the Field

Testing Location Overview:  The hiking environment of the south-west of Western Australia allows for hiking and backpacking from coastal plains to forest. Elevation ranges from 0 to 585 metres (0 to 1,920 feet). Within this region, I hike in varying conditions from forestry roads, to sandy tracks to single-purpose walking trails, to rock hopping, to beach walking to completely off-track walking through open and dense country.

[Click here to return to the top]

Weather Conditions: During the summer period, daytime temperatures average 30° C (86° F), whereas from March through to December the daytime average temperatures range from 15° C to 26° C (59° F to 79° F). During the autumn, winter, and spring periods the normal weather pattern is fairly wet with frequent heavy rainstorms evident. It does not normally snow in Western Australia.

According to The Times Atlas of the World (Concise Edition - Revised 1997) our weather is described as being "Mediterranean - rainy climates with mild winters, coolest month above 0° C (32° F), but below 18° C (64° F); warmest month above 10° C (50° F)." The atlas depicts the coastal area north of Los Angeles as having the same climate.

[Click here to return to the top]

Field experience:

Since posting my Initial Report in June 2004 I have used the Overland Carbon poles on three weekend walks in a mix of on-track and off-track walking environments.  The walks were in late May (Plavins Block, Dwellingup), Noggerup (south of Collie) in late June and in the Avon Valley National Park in late July. I have covered approximately 50 to 60 km (31 - 37 mi) with the poles.  I have also used them as pitching poles in combination with a MSR Missing Link shelter.

In my Initial Report I outlined a number of features of the poles and my intended testing of same.  These comments follow along with my field testing comments.  The points from the Initial Report are in teal.

 From the hangtag attached to the poles:

"Three-section telescoping poles compress for compact storage."  I will report on the general functionality of compressing the poles in various usage and transport roles;

The poles collapse, the poles lengthen. That side of things works fine.  I have carried these poles on the side of my Macpac Cascade pack without trouble.  The length is fine for this pack. I have had some "problems" with the LockJaw expander, but will comment below on this aspect.  In terms of storage when not bushwalking, I store the poles at home disassembled, that is with each section separated.  This seems to have had no adverse effect and on the positive side has not in any noticeable way affected the function of the expander.

"Full carbon fiber construction for light weight."

I think the comment I made in my notes after my Noggerup walks sums up my thinking ..." light; really noticed the light weight this weekend." Compared to my aluminium poles, I find these poles light!  They are sweet, I don't feel any stress on my arms or wrists from using them.

"Reliable LockJaw expander keeps the desired length."  I will report on the functioning of the expander both to keep the poles locked as well as ease of release for adjustment. MSR also provide instructions on how to release the poles should the mechanism get locked.  This suggests that the LockJaw expander can lock. Should this happen, I will apply these instructions and report back on my experience.

Ahh, the LockJaw expander. I must admit until I started using these poles, I had my doubts about this type of expander/lock on poles, having a preference for the flick lock style. Am I won over? Not really. I find that the LockJaw expander either really does lock down and I have to bang the poles to get it loose or I don't lock it properly and the pole gradually gets shorter. The expander locking tight is fine once I have the length right, but can be frustrating if I want to vary the length as I go from flat ground to hill climbing to descents and so on. Easy adjustment can be frustrating if I have over-locked the expander. I also find that the movement when it is not tightened enough frustrating. I guess I find the certainty (or ability to judge the tightness) that I have experienced with the flick-lock style of lock missing from LockJaw expander.  All that said, once the expander is locked in properly it sure hangs in there :-).

"Lightweight foam grips with anti-shock straps for comfort." Comfort of the grips will be examined in varying conditions and will be reported on.

A comment on the foam grips. I have used the poles on a cold night walk, well cold by my standards, on warm days and in rain. I have found them comfortable in all circumstances and have not experienced any stickiness or other similar discomfort from the grips. I find they fit my hands comfortably and I have not experienced any discomfort in the hand after a days walking. All up pretty happy with the grips. In respect of the wrist straps, once I worked out how to adjust them ... you know, pays to read the instructions drungo :-) I have found them comfortable and supportive. I don't think I would claim that they are anti-shock; I don't feel that they absorb shock as such but they do provide some support to the wrist. Again in the varying weather conditions I have found them comfortable. Nothing negative to report on this aspect.

From the website:

"Ideal for Fast & Light trips where weight is of paramount importance."
"Full carbon-fiber construction reduces weight and dampens impact forces each time the pole strikes the trail."
"Anti-shock wrist straps absorb shock for a soft ride."
"7° Natural Angle grip provides the ultimate in comfort."

The last three points relate to comfort and use of the poles.  I intend to use the poles in varying conditions including off and on-track walking and will report on my experiences in the later reports.

In addition to these points above I will be examining the strength and durability of the poles; the ease of cleaning and stripping the poles down after use in varying bushwalking conditions; continuing ease of adjusting and locking the wrist straps.

As outlined above, I am pretty happy with the poles. I have found them comfortable, easy to use, functional (with the exception of the LockJaw which is okay, but not as good as it could be in my view), easy to strip down and clean and easy to put back to together.  I have not experienced anything to date to suggest strength or durability issues and I have used the poles in some off-track walking conditions where it is easy to catch and bend or break poles. So far, no damage.

I have as I alluded to early in this report, also used them as the poles for the MSR Missing Link shelter. I have found that they work fine in this role and in fact I now take two less pegs, using the poles in their place.  The poles expand to the ideal length for this shelter.

Overall, my experience so far with the poles has been very positive and I thank BackpackGearTest.org and MSR for introducing me to two-pole walking ... you have a convert!

[Click here to return to the top]




Read more reviews of MSR gear
Read more gear reviews by Andrew Priest

Reviews > Trekking Poles > Poles > MSR OverLand Carbon > Andrew Priest > Field Report



All material on this site is the exclusive property of BackpackGearTest.org.
BackpackGearTest software copyright David Anderson